Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) Control Word for Use over an MPLS PSN
draft-ietf-pwe3-cw-06
Yes
(Mark Townsley)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Bert Wijnen)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Jon Peterson)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Sam Hartman)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Ted Hardie)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 06 and is now closed.
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2005-08-18)
Unknown
Advice to new user of proto method: the wg chair shepherd's questionnaire items before the normal writeup should go into the log, not in the ballot.
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-08-17)
Unknown
1. The draft cites RFC 1883 which was obsoleted by RFC 2460. 2. [From Gen-ART review by John Loughney] I'm not an MPLS expert, so reading the abstract (two sentences) with a large number of acronyms presents a bit of a barrier for understanding exactly what is going on here: ... The design of these fields is chosen so that an MPLS LSR performing MPLS payload inspection will not confuse a PWE3 payload with an IP payload. Suggestion: expand most of the acronyms.
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2005-08-17)
Unknown
Please spell out the first use of "OAM."
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown