%% You should probably cite rfc7267 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-pwe3-dynamic-ms-pw-22, number = {draft-ietf-pwe3-dynamic-ms-pw-22}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-dynamic-ms-pw/22/}, author = {Luca Martini and Matthew Bocci and Florin Balus}, title = {{Dynamic Placement of Multi-Segment Pseudowires}}, pagetotal = 24, year = 2014, month = mar, day = 10, abstract = {RFC 5254 describes the service provider requirements for extending the reach of pseudowires (PWs) across multiple Packet Switched Network domains. A multi-segment PW is defined as a set of two or more contiguous PW segments that behave and function as a single point-to-point PW. This document describes extensions to the PW control protocol to dynamically place the segments of the multi-segment pseudowire among a set of Provider Edge (PE) routers. This document also updates RFC 6073 by updating the value of the Length field of the PW Switching Point PE Sub-TLV Type 0x06 to 14.}, }