%% You should probably cite rfc6718 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-pwe3-redundancy-06, number = {draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-06}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy/06/}, author = {Praveen Muley and Mustapha Aissaoui and Matthew Bocci}, title = {{Pseudowire Redundancy}}, pagetotal = 15, year = 2012, month = feb, day = 16, abstract = {This document describes a framework comprised of a number of scenarios and associated requirements for pseudowire (PW) redundancy. A set of redundant PWs is configured between provider edge (PE) nodes in single segment PW applications, or between Terminating PE nodes in Multi-Segment PW applications. In order for the PE/T-PE nodes to indicate the preferred PW to use for forwarding PW packets to one another, a new PW status is required to indicate the preferential forwarding status of active or standby for each PW in the redundancy set.}, }