%% You should probably cite rfc6718 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-pwe3-redundancy-07,
    number =    {draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-07},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy/07/},
    author =    {Praveen Muley and Mustapha Aissaoui and Matthew Bocci},
    title =     {{Pseudowire Redundancy}},
    pagetotal = 16,
    year =      2012,
    month =     apr,
    day =       23,
    abstract =  {This document describes a framework comprised of a number of scenarios and associated requirements for pseudowire (PW) redundancy. A set of redundant PWs is configured between provider edge (PE) nodes in single segment PW applications, or between Terminating PE nodes in Multi-Segment PW applications. In order for the PE/T-PE nodes to indicate the preferred PW to use for forwarding PW packets to one another, a new PW status is required to indicate the preferential forwarding status of active or standby for each PW in the redundancy set.},
}