%% You should probably cite rfc9221 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-quic-datagram-09,
    number =    {draft-ietf-quic-datagram-09},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-datagram/09/},
    author =    {Tommy Pauly and Eric Kinnear and David Schinazi},
    title =     {{An Unreliable Datagram Extension to QUIC}},
    pagetotal = 10,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {This document defines an extension to the QUIC transport protocol to add support for sending and receiving unreliable datagrams over a QUIC connection. Discussion Venues This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC. Discussion of this document takes place on the QUIC Working Group mailing list (mailto:quic@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/. Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/quicwg/datagram.},
}