QUIC-LB: Generating Routable QUIC Connection IDs
draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers-04
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Martin Duke , Nick Banks | ||
| Last updated | 2020-08-14 (Latest revision 2020-07-10) | ||
| Replaces | draft-duke-quic-load-balancers | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Associated WG milestone |
|
||
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Yes | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers-04
QUIC M. Duke
Internet-Draft F5 Networks, Inc.
Intended status: Standards Track N. Banks
Expires: 15 February 2021 Microsoft
14 August 2020
QUIC-LB: Generating Routable QUIC Connection IDs
draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers-04
Abstract
QUIC connection IDs allow continuation of connections across address/
port 4-tuple changes, and can store routing information for stateless
or low-state load balancers. They also can prevent linkability of
connections across deliberate address migration through the use of
protected communications between client and server. This creates
issues for load-balancing intermediaries. This specification
standardizes methods for encoding routing information given a small
set of configuration parameters. This framework also enables offload
of other QUIC functions to trusted intermediaries, given the explicit
cooperation of the QUIC server.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 15 February 2021.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text
as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.1. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Protocol Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.1. Simplicity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2. Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. First CID octet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1. Config Rotation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.2. Configuration Failover . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3. Length Self-Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.4. Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4. Routing Algorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4.1. Plaintext CID Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.1.1. Configuration Agent Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.1.2. Load Balancer Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
4.1.3. Server Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.2. Stream Cipher CID Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.2.1. Configuration Agent Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.2.2. Load Balancer Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4.2.3. Server Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.3. Block Cipher CID Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.3.1. Configuration Agent Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4.3.2. Load Balancer Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.3.3. Server Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
5. ICMP Processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
6. Retry Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
6.1. Common Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
6.2. No-Shared-State Retry Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
6.2.1. Configuration Agent Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
6.2.2. Service Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
6.2.3. Server Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
6.3. Shared-State Retry Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
6.3.1. Configuration Agent Actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
6.3.2. Service Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
6.3.3. Server Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
7. Configuration Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
8. Additional Use Cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
8.1. Load balancer chains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
8.2. Moving connections between servers . . . . . . . . . . . 22
9. Version Invariance of QUIC-LB . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
10. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
10.1. Attackers not between the load balancer and server . . . 23
10.2. Attackers between the load balancer and server . . . . . 24
10.3. Multiple Configuration IDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
10.4. Limited configuration scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
10.5. Stateless Reset Oracle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
11. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Appendix A. Load Balancer Test Vectors . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
A.1. Plaintext Connection ID Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
A.2. Stream Cipher Connection ID Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . 26
A.3. Block Cipher Connection ID Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . 27
Appendix B. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Appendix C. Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
C.1. since-draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers-03 . . . . . . . . . 28
C.2. since-draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers-02 . . . . . . . . . 28
C.3. since-draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers-01 . . . . . . . . . 28
C.4. since-draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers-00 . . . . . . . . . 29
C.5. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-06 . . . . . . . . . 29
C.6. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-05 . . . . . . . . . 29
C.7. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-04 . . . . . . . . . 29
C.8. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-03 . . . . . . . . . 29
C.9. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-02 . . . . . . . . . 29
C.10. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-01 . . . . . . . . . 30
C.11. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-00 . . . . . . . . . 30
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
1. Introduction
QUIC packets [QUIC-TRANSPORT] usually contain a connection ID to
allow endpoints to associate packets with different address/port
4-tuples to the same connection context. This feature makes
connections robust in the event of NAT rebinding. QUIC endpoints
usually designate the connection ID which peers use to address
packets. Server-generated connection IDs create a potential need for
out-of-band communication to support QUIC.
QUIC allows servers (or load balancers) to designate an initial
connection ID to encode useful routing information for load
balancers. It also encourages servers, in packets protected by
cryptography, to provide additional connection IDs to the client.
This allows clients that know they are going to change IP address or
port to use a separate connection ID on the new path, thus reducing
linkability as clients move through the world.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
There is a tension between the requirements to provide routing
information and mitigate linkability. Ultimately, because new
connection IDs are in protected packets, they must be generated at
the server if the load balancer does not have access to the
connection keys. However, it is the load balancer that has the
context necessary to generate a connection ID that encodes useful
routing information. In the absence of any shared state between load
balancer and server, the load balancer must maintain a relatively
expensive table of server-generated connection IDs, and will not
route packets correctly if they use a connection ID that was
originally communicated in a protected NEW_CONNECTION_ID frame.
This specification provides common algorithms for encoding the server
mapping in a connection ID given some shared parameters. The mapping
is generally only discoverable by observers that have the parameters,
preserving unlinkability as much as possible.
Aside from load balancing, a QUIC server may also desire to offload
other protocol functions to trusted intermediaries. These
intermediaries might include hardware assist on the server host
itself, without access to fully decrypted QUIC packets. For example,
this document specifies a means of offloading stateless retry to
counter Denial of Service attacks. It also proposes a system for
self-encoding connection ID length in all packets, so that crypto
offload can consistently look up key information.
While this document describes a small set of configuration parameters
to make the server mapping intelligible, the means of distributing
these parameters between load balancers, servers, and other trusted
intermediaries is out of its scope. There are numerous well-known
infrastructures for distribution of configuration.
1.1. Terminology
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
In this document, these words will appear with that interpretation
only when in ALL CAPS. Lower case uses of these words are not to be
interpreted as carrying significance described in RFC 2119.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
In this document, "client" and "server" refer to the endpoints of a
QUIC connection unless otherwise indicated. A "load balancer" is an
intermediary for that connection that does not possess QUIC
connection keys, but it may rewrite IP addresses or conduct other IP
or UDP processing. A "configuration agent" is the entity that
determines the QUIC-LB configuration parameters for the network and
leverages some system to distribute that configuration.
Note that stateful load balancers that act as proxies, by terminating
a QUIC connection with the client and then retrieving data from the
server using QUIC or another protocol, are treated as a server with
respect to this specification.
For brevity, "Connection ID" will often be abbreviated as "CID".
2. Protocol Objectives
2.1. Simplicity
QUIC is intended to provide unlinkability across connection
migration, but servers are not required to provide additional
connection IDs that effectively prevent linkability. If the
coordination scheme is too difficult to implement, servers behind
load balancers using connection IDs for routing will use trivially
linkable connection IDs. Clients will therefore be forced to choose
between terminating the connection during migration or remaining
linkable, subverting a design objective of QUIC.
The solution should be both simple to implement and require little
additional infrastructure for cryptographic keys, etc.
2.2. Security
In the limit where there are very few connections to a pool of
servers, no scheme can prevent the linking of two connection IDs with
high probability. In the opposite limit, where all servers have many
connections that start and end frequently, it will be difficult to
associate two connection IDs even if they are known to map to the
same server.
QUIC-LB is relevant in the region between these extremes: when the
information that two connection IDs map to the same server is helpful
to linking two connection IDs. Obviously, any scheme that
transparently communicates this mapping to outside observers
compromises QUIC's defenses against linkability.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
Though not an explicit goal of the QUIC-LB design, concealing the
server mapping also complicates attempts to focus attacks on a
specific server in the pool.
3. First CID octet
The first octet of a Connection ID is reserved for two special
purposes, one mandatory (config rotation) and one optional (length
self-description).
Subsequent sections of this document refer to the contents of this
octet as the "first octet."
3.1. Config Rotation
The first two bits of any connection ID MUST encode an identifier for
the configuration that the connection ID uses. This enables
incremental deployment of new QUIC-LB settings (e.g., keys).
When new configuration is distributed to servers, there will be a
transition period when connection IDs reflecting old and new
configuration coexist in the network. The rotation bits allow load
balancers to apply the correct routing algorithm and parameters to
incoming packets.
Configuration Agents SHOULD deliver new configurations to load
balancers before doing so to servers, so that load balancers are
ready to process CIDs using the new parameters when they arrive.
A Configuration Agent SHOULD NOT use a codepoint to represent a new
configuration until it takes precautions to make sure that all
connections using CIDs with an old configuration at that codepoint
have closed or transitioned.
Servers MUST NOT generate new connection IDs using an old
configuration after receiving a new one from the configuration agent.
Servers MUST send NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames that provide CIDs using
the new configuration, and retire CIDs using the old configuration
using the "Retire Prior To" field of that frame.
It also possible to use these bits for more long-lived distinction of
different configurations, but this has privacy implications (see
Section 10.3).
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
3.2. Configuration Failover
If a server has not received a valid QUIC-LB configuration, and
believes that low-state, Connection-ID aware load balancers are in
the path, it SHOULD generate connection IDs with the config rotation
bits set to '11' and SHOULD use the "disable_active_migration"
transport parameter in all new QUIC connections. It SHOULD NOT send
NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames with new values.
A load balancer that sees a connection ID with config rotation bits
set to '11' MUST revert to 5-tuple routing.
3.3. Length Self-Description
Local hardware cryptographic offload devices may accelerate QUIC
servers by receiving keys from the QUIC implementation indexed to the
connection ID. However, on physical devices operating multiple QUIC
servers, it is impractical to efficiently lookup these keys if the
connection ID does not self-encode its own length.
Note that this is a function of particular server devices and is
irrelevant to load balancers. As such, load balancers MAY omit this
from their configuration. However, the remaining 6 bits in the first
octet of the Connection ID are reserved to express the length of the
following connection ID, not including the first octet.
A server not using this functionality SHOULD make the six bits appear
to be random.
3.4. Format
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|C R| CID Len |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 1: First Octet Format
The first octet has the following fields:
CR: Config Rotation bits.
CID Len: Length Self-Description (if applicable). Encodes the length
of the Connection ID following the First Octet.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
4. Routing Algorithms
In QUIC-LB, load balancers do not generate individual connection IDs
to servers. Instead, they communicate the parameters of an algorithm
to generate routable connection IDs.
The algorithms differ in the complexity of configuration at both load
balancer and server. Increasing complexity improves obfuscation of
the server mapping.
As clients sometimes generate the DCIDs in long headers, these might
not conform to the expectations of the routing algorithm. These are
called "non-compliant DCIDs":
* The DCID might not be long enough for the routing algorithm to
process.
* The extracted server mapping might not correspond to an active
server.
Load balancers MUST forward packets with long headers with non-
compliant DCIDs to an active server using an algorithm of its own
choosing. It need not coordinate this algorithm with the servers.
The algorithm SHOULD be deterministic over short time scales so that
related packets go to the same server. The design of this algorithm
SHOULD consider the version-invariant properties of QUIC described in
[QUIC-INVARIANTS] to maximize its robustness to future versions of
QUIC. For example, a non-compliant DCID might be converted to an
integer and divided by the number of servers, with the modulus used
to forward the packet. The number of servers is usually consistent
on the time scale of a QUIC connection handshake. See also
Section 9.
As a partial exception to the above, load balancers MAY drop packets
with long headers and non-compliant DCIDs if and only if it knows
that the encoded QUIC version does not allow a non-compliant DCID in
a packet with that signature. For example, a load balancer can
safely drop a QUIC version 1 Handshake packet with a non-compliant
DCIDs. The prohibition against dropping packets with long headers
remains for unknown QUIC versions.
Load balancers SHOULD drop packets with non-compliant DCIDs in a
short header.
A QUIC-LB configuration MAY significantly over-provision the server
ID space (i.e., provide far more codepoints than there are servers)
to increase the probability that a randomly generated Destination
Connection ID is non- compliant.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
Load balancers MUST forward packets with compliant DCIDs to a server
in accordance with the chosen routing algorithm.
The load balancer MUST NOT make the routing behavior dependent on any
bits in the first octet of the QUIC packet header, except the first
bit, which indicates a long header. All other bits are QUIC version-
dependent and intermediaries would cannot build their design on
version-specific templates.
There are situations where a server pool might be operating two or
more routing algorithms or parameter sets simultaneously. The load
balancer uses the first two bits of the connection ID to multiplex
incoming DCIDs over these schemes.
This section describes three participants: the configuration agent,
the load balancer, and the server.
4.1. Plaintext CID Algorithm
The Plaintext CID Algorithm makes no attempt to obscure the mapping
of connections to servers, significantly increasing linkability. The
format is depicted in the figure below.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| First octet | Server ID (X=8..152) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Any (0..152-X) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 2: Plaintext CID Format
4.1.1. Configuration Agent Actions
The configuration agent selects a number of bytes of the server
connection ID to encode individual server IDs, called the "routing
bytes". The number of bytes MUST have enough entropy to have a
different code point for each server.
It also assigns a server ID to each server.
4.1.2. Load Balancer Actions
On each incoming packet, the load balancer extracts consecutive
octets, beginning with the second octet. These bytes represent the
server ID.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
4.1.3. Server Actions
The server chooses a connection ID length. This MUST be at least one
byte longer than the routing bytes.
When a server needs a new connection ID, it encodes its assigned
server ID in consecutive octets beginning with the second. All other
bits in the connection ID, except for the first octet, MAY be set to
any other value. These other bits SHOULD appear random to observers.
4.2. Stream Cipher CID Algorithm
The Stream Cipher CID algorithm provides cryptographic protection at
the cost of additional per-packet processing at the load balancer to
decrypt every incoming connection ID. The CID format is depicted
below.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| First Octet | Nonce (X=64..128) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Encrypted Server ID (Y=8..152-X) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| For server use (0..152-X-Y) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 3: Stream Cipher CID Format
4.2.1. Configuration Agent Actions
The configuration agent assigns a server ID to every server in its
pool, and determines a server ID length (in octets) sufficiently
large to encode all server IDs, including potential future servers.
The configuration agent also selects a nonce length and an 16-octet
AES-ECB key to use for connection ID decryption. The nonce length
MUST be at least 8 octets and no more than 16 octets. The nonce
length and server ID length MUST sum to 19 or fewer octets.
4.2.2. Load Balancer Actions
Upon receipt of a QUIC packet, the load balancer extracts as many of
the earliest octets from the destination connection ID as necessary
to match the nonce length. The server ID immediately follows.
The load balancer decrypts the nonce and the server ID using the
following three pass algorithm:
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
* Pass 1: The load balancer decrypts the server ID using 128-bit AES
Electronic Codebook (ECB) mode, much like QUIC header protection.
The encrypted nonce octets are zero-padded to 16 octets. AES-ECB
encrypts this encrypted nonce using its key to generate a mask
which it applies to the encrypted server id. This provides an
intermediate value of the server ID, referred to as server-id
intermediate.
server_id_intermediate = encrypted_server_id ^ AES-ECB(key, padded-
encrypted-nonce)
* Pass 2: The load balancer decrypts the nonce octets using 128-bit
AES ECB mode, using the server-id intermediate as "nonce" for this
pass. The server-id intermediate octets are zero-padded to 16
octets. AES-ECB encrypts this padded server-id intermediate using
its key to generate a mask which it applies to the encrypted
nonce. This provides the decrypted nonce value.
nonce = encrypted_nonce ^ AES-ECB(key, padded-server_id_intermediate)
* Pass 3: The load balancer decrypts the server ID using 128-bit AES
ECB mode. The nonce octets are zero-padded to 16 octets. AES-ECB
encrypts this nonce using its key to generate a mask which it
applies to the intermediate server id. This provides the
decrypted server ID.
server_id = server_id_intermediate ^ AES-ECB(key, padded-nonce)
For example, if the nonce length is 10 octets and the server ID
length is 2 octets, the connection ID can be as small as 13 octets.
The load balancer uses the the second through eleventh octets of the
connection ID for the nonce, zero-pads it to 16 octets, uses xors the
result with the twelfth and thirteenth octet. The result is padded
with 14 octets of zeros and encrypted to obtain a mask that is xored
with the nonce octets. Finally, the nonce octets are padded with six
octets of zeros, encrypted, and the first two octets xored with the
server ID octets to obtain the actual server ID.
This three-pass algorithm is a simplified version of the FFX
algorithm, with the property that each encrypted nonce value depends
on all server ID bits, and each encrypted server ID bit depends on
all nonce bits and all server ID bits. This mitigates attacks
against stream ciphers in which attackers simply flip encrypted
server-ID bits.
The output of the decryption is the server ID that the load balancer
uses for routing.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
4.2.3. Server Actions
When generating a routable connection ID, the server writes arbitrary
bits into its nonce octets, and its provided server ID into the
server ID octets. Servers MAY opt to have a longer connection ID
beyond the nonce and server ID. The additional bits MAY encode
additional information, but SHOULD appear essentially random to
observers.
If the decrypted nonce bits increase monotonically, that guarantees
that nonces are not reused between connection IDs from the same
server.
The server encrypts the server ID using exactly the algorithm as
described in Section 4.2.2, performing the three passes in reverse
order.
4.3. Block Cipher CID Algorithm
The Block Cipher CID Algorithm, by using a full 16 octets of
plaintext and a 128-bit cipher, provides higher cryptographic
protection and detection of non-compliant connection IDs. However,
it also requires connection IDs of at least 17 octets, increasing
overhead of client-to-server packets.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| First octet | Encrypted server ID (X=8..128) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Encrypted bits for server use (128-X) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Unencrypted bits for server use (0..24) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 4: Block Cipher CID Format
4.3.1. Configuration Agent Actions
The configuration agent assigns a server ID to every server in its
pool, and determines a server ID length (in octets) sufficiently
large to encode all server IDs, including potential future servers.
The server ID will start in the second octet of the decrypted
connection ID and occupy continuous octets beyond that.
They server ID length MUST be no more than 16 octets and SHOULD sum
to no more than 12 octets, to provide servers adequate space to
encode their own opaque data.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
The configuration agent also selects an 16-octet AES-ECB key to use
for connection ID decryption.
4.3.2. Load Balancer Actions
Upon receipt of a QUIC packet, the load balancer reads the first
octet to obtain the config rotation bits. It then decrypts the
subsequent 16 octets using AES-ECB decryption and the chosen key.
The decrypted plaintext contains the server id and opaque server data
in that order. The load balancer uses the server ID octets for
routing.
4.3.3. Server Actions
When generating a routable connection ID, the server MUST choose a
connection ID length between 17 and 20 octets. The server writes its
provided server ID into the server ID octets and arbitrary bits into
the remaining bits. These arbitrary bits MAY encode additional
information. Bits in the eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth
octets SHOULD appear essentially random to observers. The first
octet is reserved as described in Section 3.
The server then encrypts the second through seventeenth octets using
the 128-bit AES-ECB cipher.
5. ICMP Processing
For protocols where 4-tuple load balancing is sufficient, it is
straightforward to deliver ICMP packets from the network to the
correct server, by reading the IP and transport-layer headers to
obtain the 4-tuple. When routing is based on connection ID, further
measures are required, as most QUIC packets that trigger ICMP
responses will only contain a client-generated connection ID that
contains no routing information.
To solve this problem, load balancers MAY maintain a mapping of
Client IP and port to server ID based on recently observed packets.
Alternatively, servers MAY implement the technique described in
Section 14.4.1 of [QUIC-TRANSPORT] to increase the likelihood a
Source Connection ID is included in ICMP responses to Path Maximum
Transmission Unit (PMTU) probes. Load balancers MAY parse the echoed
packet to extract the Source Connection ID, if it contains a QUIC
long header, and extract the Server ID as if it were in a Destination
CID.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
6. Retry Service
When a server is under load, QUICv1 allows it to defer storage of
connection state until the client proves it can receive packets at
its advertised IP address. Through the use of a Retry packet, a
token in subsequent client Initial packets, and the
original_destination_connection_id transport parameter, servers
verify address ownership and clients verify that there is no "man in
the middle" generating Retry packets.
As a trusted Retry Service is literally a "man in the middle," the
service must communicate the original_destination_connection_id back
to the server so that it can pass client verification. It also must
either verify the address itself (with the server trusting this
verification) or make sure there is common context for the server to
verify the address using a service-generated token.
The service must also communicate the source connection ID of the
Retry packet to the server so that it can include it in a transport
parameter for client verification.
There are two different mechanisms to allow offload of DoS mitigation
to a trusted network service. One requires no shared state; the
server need only be configured to trust a retry service, though this
imposes other operational constraints. The other requires shared
key, but has no such constraints.
Retry services MUST forward all QUIC packets that are not of type
Initial or 0-RTT. Other packets types might involve changed IP
addresses or connection IDs, so it is not practical for Retry
Services to identify such packets as valid or invalid.
6.1. Common Requirements
Regardless of mechanism, a retry service has an active mode, where it
is generating Retry packets, and an inactive mode, where it is not,
based on its assessment of server load and the likelihood an attack
is underway. The choice of mode MAY be made on a per-packet or per-
connection basis, through a stochastic process or based on client
address.
A retry service MUST forward all packets for a QUIC version it does
not understand. Note that if servers support versions the retry
service does not, this may increase load on the servers. However,
dropping these packets would introduce chokepoints to block
deployment of new QUIC versions. Note that future versions of QUIC
might not have Retry packets, require different information in Retry,
or use different packet type indicators.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
6.2. No-Shared-State Retry Service
The no-shared-state retry service requires no coordination, except
that the server must be configured to accept this service and know
which QUIC versions the retry service supports. The scheme uses the
first bit of the token to distinguish between tokens from Retry
packets (codepoint '0') and tokens from NEW_TOKEN frames (codepoint
'1').
6.2.1. Configuration Agent Actions
The configuration agent distributes a list of QUIC versions to be
served by the Retry Service.
6.2.2. Service Requirements
A no-shared-state retry service MUST be present on all paths from
potential clients to the server. These paths MUST fail to pass QUIC
traffic should the service fail for any reason. That is, if the
service is not operational, the server MUST NOT be exposed to client
traffic. Otherwise, servers that have already disabled their Retry
capability would be vulnerable to attack.
The path between service and server MUST be free of any potential
attackers. Note that this and other requirements above severely
restrict the operational conditions in which a no-shared-state retry
service can safely operate.
Retry tokens generated by the service MUST have the format below.
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|0| ODCIL (7) | RSCIL (8) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Original Destination Connection ID (0..160) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Retry Source Connection ID (0..160) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Opaque Data (variable) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 5: Format of non-shared-state retry service tokens
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
The first bit of retry tokens generated by the service MUST be zero.
The token has the following additional fields:
ODCIL: The length of the original destination connection ID from the
triggering Initial packet. This is in cleartext to be readable for
the server, but authenticated later in the token.
RSCIL: The retry source connection ID length.
Original Destination Connection ID: This also in cleartext and
authenticated later.
Retry Source Connection ID: This also in cleartext and authenticated
later.
Opaque Data: This data MUST contain encrypted information that allows
the retry service to validate the client's IP address, in accordance
with the QUIC specification. It MUST also provide a
cryptographically secure means to validate the integrity of the
entire token.
Upon receipt of an Initial packet with a token that begins with '0',
the retry service MUST validate the token in accordance with the QUIC
specification.
In active mode, the service MUST issue Retry packets for all Client
initial packets that contain no token, or a token that has the first
bit set to '1'. It MUST NOT forward the packet to the server. The
service MUST validate all tokens with the first bit set to '0'. If
successful, the service MUST forward the packet with the token
intact. If unsuccessful, it MUST drop the packet. The Retry Service
MAY send an Initial Packet containing a CONNECTION_CLOSE frame with
the INVALID_TOKEN error code when dropping the packet.
Note that this scheme has a performance drawback. When the retry
service is in active mode, clients with a token from a NEW_TOKEN
frame will suffer a 1-RTT penalty even though it has proof of address
with its token.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
In inactive mode, the service MUST forward all packets that have no
token or a token with the first bit set to '1'. It MUST validate all
tokens with the first bit set to '0'. If successful, the service
MUST forward the packet with the token intact. If unsuccessful, it
MUST either drop the packet or forward it with the token removed.
The latter requires decryption and re-encryption of the entire
Initial packet to avoid authentication failure. Forwarding the
packet causes the server to respond without the
original_destination_connection_id transport parameter, which
preserves the normal QUIC signal to the client that there is an
unauthorized man in the middle.
6.2.3. Server Requirements
A server behind a non-shared-state retry service MUST NOT send Retry
packets for a QUIC version the retry service understands. It MAY
send Retry for QUIC versions the Retry Service does not understand.
Tokens sent in NEW_TOKEN frames MUST have the first bit be set to
'1'.
If a server receives an Initial Packet with the first bit set to '1',
it could be from a server-generated NEW_TOKEN frame and should be
processed in accordance with the QUIC specification. If a server
receives an Initial Packet with the first bit to '0', it is a Retry
token and the server MUST NOT attempt to validate it. Instead, it
MUST assume the address is validated and MUST extract the Original
Destination Connection ID and Retry Source Connection ID, assuming
the format described in Section 6.2.2.
6.3. Shared-State Retry Service
A shared-state retry service uses a shared key, so that the server
can decode the service's retry tokens. It does not require that all
traffic pass through the Retry service, so servers MAY send Retry
packets in response to Initial packets that don't include a valid
token.
Both server and service must have access to Universal time, though
tight synchronization is not necessary.
All tokens, generated by either the server or retry service, MUST use
the following format. This format is the cleartext version. On the
wire, these fields are encrypted using an AES-ECB cipher and the
token key. If the token is not a multiple of 16 octets, the last
block is padded with zeroes.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
0 1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ODCIL | RSCIL |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Original Destination Connection ID (0..160) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Retry Source Connection ID (0..160) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| ... |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ +
| |
+ Client IP Address (128) +
| |
+ +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| |
+ +
| |
+ +
| date-time (160) |
+ +
| |
+ +
| |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Opaque Data (optional) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Figure 6: Cleartext format of shared-state retry tokens
The tokens have the following fields:
ODCIL: The original destination connection ID length. Tokens in
NEW_TOKEN frames MUST set this field to zero.
RSCIL: The retry source connection ID length. Tokens in NEW_TOKEN
frames MUST set this field to zero.
Original Destination Connection ID: The server or Retry Service
copies this from the field in the client Initial packet.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
Retry Source Connection ID: The server or Retry service copies this
from the Source Connection ID of the Retry packet.
Client IP Address: The source IP address from the triggering Initial
packet. The client IP address is 16 octets. If an IPv4 address, the
last 12 octets are zeroes.
date-time: The date-time string is a total of 20 octets and encodes
the time the token was generated. The format of date-time is
described in Section 5.6 of [RFC3339]. This ASCII field MUST use the
"Z" character for time-offset.
Opaque Data: The server may use this field to encode additional
information, such as congestion window, RTT, or MTU. Opaque data
SHOULD also allow servers to distinguish between retry tokens (which
trigger use of the original_destination_connection_id transport
parameter) and NEW_TOKEN frame tokens.
6.3.1. Configuration Agent Actions
The configuration agent generates and distributes a "token key."
6.3.2. Service Requirements
When in active mode, the service MUST generate Retry tokens with the
format described above when it receives a client Initial packet with
no token.
In active mode, the service SHOULD decrypt incoming tokens. The
service SHOULD drop packets with an IP address that does not match,
and SHOULD forward packets that do, regardless of the other fields.
In inactive mode, the service SHOULD forward all packets to the
server so that the server can issue an up-to-date token to the
client.
6.3.3. Server Requirements
The server MUST validate all tokens that arrive in Initial packets,
as they may have bypassed the Retry service. It SHOULD use the date-
time field to apply its expiration limits for tokens. This need not
be synchronized with the retry service. However, servers MAY allow
retry tokens marked as being a few seconds in the future, due to
possible clock synchronization issues.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
After decrypting the token, the server uses the corresponding fields
to populate the original_destination_connection_id transport
parameter, with a length equal to ODCIL, and the
retry_source_connection_id transport parameter, with length equal to
RSCIL.
As discussed in [QUIC-TRANSPORT], a server MUST NOT send a Retry
packet in response to an Initial packet that contains a retry token.
7. Configuration Requirements
QUIC-LB requires common configuration to synchronize understanding of
encodings and guarantee explicit consent of the server.
The load balancer and server MUST agree on a routing algorithm and
the relevant parameters for that algorithm.
For Plaintext CID Routing, this consists of the Server ID and the
routing bytes. The Server ID is unique to each server, and the
routing bytes are global.
For Stream Cipher CID Routing, this consists of the Server ID, Server
ID Length, Key, and Nonce Length. The Server ID is unique to each
server, but the others MUST be global. The authentication token MUST
be distributed out of band for this algorithm to operate.
For Block Cipher CID Routing, this consists of the Server ID, Server
ID Length, Key, and Zero-Padding Length. The Server ID is unique to
each server, but the others MUST be global.
A full QUIC-LB configuration MUST also specify the information
content of the first CID octet and the presence and mode of any Retry
Service.
The following pseudocode describes the data items necessary to store
a full QUIC-LB configuration at the server. It is meant to describe
the conceptual range and not specify the presentation of such
configuration in an internet packet. The comments signify the range
of acceptable values where applicable.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
uint2 config_rotation_bits;
boolean first_octet_encodes_cid_length;
enum { none, non_shared_state, shared_state } retry_service;
select (retry_service) {
case none: null;
case non_shared_state: uint32 list_of_quic_versions[];
case shared_state: uint8 key[16];
} retry_service_config;
enum { none, plaintext, stream_cipher, block_cipher }
routing_algorithm;
select (routing_algorithm) {
case none: null;
case plaintext: struct {
uint8 server_id_length; /* 1..19 */
uint8 server_id[server_id_length];
} plaintext_config;
case stream_cipher: struct {
uint8 nonce_length; /* 8..16 */
uint8 server_id_length; /* 1..(19 - nonce_length) */
uint8 server_id[server_id_length];
uint8 key[16];
} stream_cipher_config;
case block_cipher: struct {
uint8 server_id_length;
uint8 server_id[server_id_length];
uint8 key[16];
} block_cipher_config;
} routing_algorithm_config;
8. Additional Use Cases
This section discusses considerations for some deployment scenarios
not implied by the specification above.
8.1. Load balancer chains
Some network architectures may have multiple tiers of low-state load
balancers, where a first tier of devices makes a routing decision to
the next tier, and so on until packets reach the server. Although
QUIC-LB is not explicitly designed for this use case, it is possible
to support it.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
If each load balancer is assigned a range of server IDs that is a
subset of the range of IDs assigned to devices that are closer to the
client, then the first devices to process an incoming packet can
extract the server ID and then map it to the correct forwrading
address. Note that this solution is extensible to arbitrarily large
numbers of load-balancing tiers, as the maximum server ID space is
quite large.
8.2. Moving connections between servers
Some deployments may transparently move a connection from one server
to another. The means of transferring connection state between
servers is out of scope of this document.
To support a handover, a server involved in the transition could
issue CIDs that map to the new server via a NEW_CONNECTION_ID frame,
and retire CIDs associated with the new server using the "Retire
Prior To" field in that frame.
Alternately, if the old server is going offline, the load balancer
could simply map its server ID to the new server's address.
9. Version Invariance of QUIC-LB
Retry Services are inherently dependent on the format (and existence)
of Retry Packets in each version of QUIC, and so Retry Service
configuration explicitly includes the supported QUIC versions.
The server ID encodings, and requirements for their handling, are
designed to be QUIC version independent (see [QUIC-INVARIANTS]). A
QUIC-LB load balancer will generally not require changes as servers
deploy new versions of QUIC. However, there are several unlikely
future design decisions that could impact the operation of QUIC-LB.
The maximum Connection ID length could be below the minimum necessary
for one or more encoding algorithms.
Section 4 provides guidance about how load balancers should handle
non-compliant DCIDs. This guidance, and the implementation of an
algorithm to handle these DCIDs, rests on some assumptions:
* Incoming short headers do not contain DCIDs that are client-
generated.
* The use of client-generated incoming DCIDs does not persist beyond
a few round trips in the connection.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
* While the client is using DCIDs it generated, some exposed fields
(IP address, UDP port, client-generated destination Connection ID)
remain constant for all packets sent on the same connection.
While this document does not update the commitments in
[QUIC-INVARIANTS], the additional assumptions are minimal and
narrowly scoped, and provide a likely set of constants that load
balancers can use with minimal risk of version- dependence.
If these assumptions are invalid, this specification is likely to
lead to loss of packets that contain non-compliant DCIDs, and in
extreme cases connection failure.
10. Security Considerations
QUIC-LB is intended to prevent linkability. Attacks would therefore
attempt to subvert this purpose.
Note that the Plaintext CID algorithm makes no attempt to obscure the
server mapping, and therefore does not address these concerns. It
exists to allow consistent CID encoding for compatibility across a
network infrastructure, which makes QUIC robust to NAT rebinding.
Servers that are running the Plaintext CID algorithm SHOULD only use
it to generate new CIDs for the Server Initial Packet and SHOULD NOT
send CIDs in QUIC NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames, except that it sends one
new Connection ID in the event of config rotation Section 3.1. Doing
so might falsely suggest to the client that said CIDs were generated
in a secure fashion.
A linkability attack would find some means of determining that two
connection IDs route to the same server. As described above, there
is no scheme that strictly prevents linkability for all traffic
patterns, and therefore efforts to frustrate any analysis of server
ID encoding have diminishing returns.
10.1. Attackers not between the load balancer and server
Any attacker might open a connection to the server infrastructure and
aggressively simulate migration to obtain a large sample of IDs that
map to the same server. It could then apply analytical techniques to
try to obtain the server encoding.
The Stream and Block Cipher CID algorithms provide robust protection
against any sort of linkage. The Plaintext CID algorithm makes no
attempt to protect this encoding.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
Were this analysis to obtain the server encoding, then on-path
observers might apply this analysis to correlating different client
IP addresses.
10.2. Attackers between the load balancer and server
Attackers in this privileged position are intrinsically able to map
two connection IDs to the same server. The QUIC-LB algorithms do
prevent the linkage of two connection IDs to the same individual
connection if servers make reasonable selections when generating new
IDs for that connection.
10.3. Multiple Configuration IDs
During the period in which there are multiple deployed configuration
IDs (see Section 3.1), there is a slight increase in linkability.
The server space is effectively divided into segments with CIDs that
have different config rotation bits. Entities that manage servers
SHOULD strive to minimize these periods by quickly deploying new
configurations across the server pool.
10.4. Limited configuration scope
A simple deployment of QUIC-LB in a cloud provider might use the same
global QUIC-LB configuration across all its load balancers that route
to customer servers. An attacker could then simply become a
customer, obtain the configuration, and then extract server IDs of
other customers' connections at will.
To avoid this, the configuration agent SHOULD issue QUIC-LB
configurations to mutually distrustful servers that have different
keys for encryption algorithms. The load balancers can distinguish
these configurations by external IP address, or by assigning
different values to the config rotation bits (Section 3.1). Note
that either solution has a privacy impact; see Section 10.3.
These techniques are not necessary for the plaintext algorithm, as it
does not attempt to conceal the server ID.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
10.5. Stateless Reset Oracle
Section 21.9 of [QUIC-TRANSPORT] discusses the Stateless Reset Oracle
attack. For a server deployment to be vulnerable, an attacking
client must be able to cause two packets with the same Destination
CID to arrive at two different servers that share the same
cryptographic context for Stateless Reset tokens. As QUIC-LB
requires deterministic routing of DCIDs over the life of a
connection, it is a sufficient means of avoiding an Oracle without
additional measures.
11. IANA Considerations
There are no IANA requirements.
12. References
12.1. Normative References
[QUIC-INVARIANTS]
Thomson, M., Ed., "Version-Independent Properties of
QUIC", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-quic-
invariants,
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-invariants>.
[QUIC-TRANSPORT]
Iyengar, J., Ed. and M. Thomson, Ed., "QUIC: A UDP-Based
Multiplexed and Secure Transport", Work in Progress,
Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-quic-transport,
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-transport>.
[RFC3339] Klyne, G. and C. Newman, "Date and Time on the Internet:
Timestamps", RFC 3339, DOI 10.17487/RFC3339, July 2002,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3339>.
12.2. Informative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
Appendix A. Load Balancer Test Vectors
Because any connection ID encoding in this specification includes
many bits for server use without affecting extraction of the server
ID, there are many possible connection IDs for any given set of
parameters. However, every connection ID should result in a unique
server ID. The following connection IDs can be used to verify that a
load balancer implementation extracts the correct server ID.
A.1. Plaintext Connection ID Algorithm
TBD
A.2. Stream Cipher Connection ID Algorithm
cr_bits 0x0 length_self_encoding: y nonce_len 10 sid_len 1 key
9c46142f1597511357cf437841721d4b
cid 0b05be7bf896ed26cb4cc59a sid ab cid 0b43909398577dd7df1597d4 sid
37 cid 0bf85fa27034785803747464 sid 0e cid 0bc630c588fdecbfbdb62e61
sid 44 cid 0b8788901684f5d4e4dc6aeb sid 83
cr_bits 0x0 length_self_encoding: n nonce_len 9 sid_len 2 key
434ae6fbf36aca0773a6a75f10e3f747
cid 08644a29067622f363d4c83e sid 846a cid 234b2899f9b213a70abfe193
sid 4417 cid 3ff4ef53bbaad327c1e18fa5 sid 7554 cid
08a0eaf4cc08f184e6cf7743 sid b78a cid 3fb2f5cf1b3e08bf97709c42 sid
ed7e
cr_bits 0x0 length_self_encoding: y nonce_len 12 sid_len 3 key
02e895bf84f6a80c3c7156da88a96755
cid 0f7405813570b8f9a6a10564d7b92834 sid 49023c cid
0f3bb656319c6af210239dcaef77d3b9 sid b0a8ce cid
0f3ae6d54ee97fc6907b5e2d60436caf sid 21f035 cid
0f4774918a6576c88f85829306f6450f sid 9e46ea cid
0f7467db6ca1eb4c185e642b0c9f8f44 sid c33db0
cr_bits 0x0 length_self_encoding: n nonce_len 11 sid_len 4 key
ccb612da03f5dc205faf9b0b1d5429cb
cid 0c4b23e27639aef72f861ad2dce39d96 sid 125fdba1 cid
063ed9a173d22be11818b77a3bd5ec37 sid 0f3f82bc cid
1a14e39b0f6ca6a3a48f6fdd2083fa09 sid 05950af2 cid
36cb4df5a7776edb21ec87c35c24e988 sid 3cb80d59 cid
05749809112a91327fef4b3152335298 sid 4746cb79
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
cr_bits 0x0 length_self_encoding: y nonce_len 8 sid_len 5 key
625696d413ea1a352401afce6eec2432
cid 0d2a7b43eeaac8b36fce2c14ac96 sid 4b00da143a cid
0ddd6cdb6685e75b91f4a1bb0dde sid f9aa795663 cid
0d870ea4d173d29484e41ea4a189 sid e430dcfb3f cid
0df12abe175241b5ab035d23910f sid 8bc66a2596 cid
0d390df5de76903ca94b2e9daa49 sid 7637d0c172
A.3. Block Cipher Connection ID Algorithm
Like the previous section, the text below lists a set of load
balancer configuration and 5 CIDs generated with that configuration.
cr_bits 0x0 length_self_encoding: y sid_len 1 zp_len 11 key
8c24cb9b9c3289b4ee63c3f3d7f93a9a
cid: 1378e44f874642624fa69e7b4aec15a2a678b8b5 sid: 48
cid: 13772c82fe8ce6a00813f76a211b730eb4b20363 sid: 66
cid: 135ccf507b1c209457f80df0217b9a1df439c4b2 sid: 30
cid: 13898459900426c073c66b1001c867f9098a7aab sid: fe
cid: 1397a18da00bf912f20049d9f0a007444f8b6699 sid: 30
cr_bits 0x0 length_self_encoding: n sid_len 2 zp_len 10 key
cc7ec42794664a8428250c12a7fb16fa
cid: 0cb28bfc1f65c3de14752bc0fc734ef824ce8f78 sid: 33fa
cid: 2345e9fc7a7be55b4ba1ff6ffa04f3f5f8c67009 sid: ee47
cid: 0d32102be441600f608c95841fd40ce978aa7a02 sid: 0c8b
cid: 2e6bfc53c91c275019cd809200fa8e23836565ab sid: feca
cid: 29b87a902ed129c26f7e4e918a68703dc71a6e0a sid: 8941
cr_bits 0x1 length_self_encoding: y sid_len 3 zp_len 9 key
42e657946b96b7052ab8e6eeb863ee24
cid: 53c48f7884d73fd9016f63e50453bfd9bcfc637d sid: b46b68
cid: 53f45532f6a4f0e1757fa15c35f9a2ab0fcce621 sid: 2147b4
cid: 5361fd4bbcee881a637210f4fffc02134772cc76 sid: e4bf4b
cid: 53881ffde14e613ef151e50ba875769d6392809b sid: c2afee
cid: 53ad0d60204d88343492334e6c4c4be88d4a3add sid: ae0331
cr_bits 0x0 length_self_encoding: n sid_len 4 zp_len 8 key
ee2dc6a3359a94b0043ca0c82715ce71
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
cid: 058b9da37f436868cca3cef40c7f98001797c611 sid: eaf846c7
cid: 1259fc97439adaf87f61250afea059e5ddf66e44 sid: 4cc5e84a
cid: 202f424376f234d5f014f41cebc38de2619c6c71 sid: f94ff800
cid: 146ac3e4bbb750d3bfb617ef4b0cb51a1cae5868 sid: c2071b1b
cid: 36dfe886538af7eb16a196935b3705c9d741479f sid: 26359dbb
cr_bits 0x2 length_self_encoding: y sid_len 5 zp_len 7 key
700837da8834840afe7720186ec610c9
cid: 931ef3cc07e2eaf08d4c1902cd564d907cc3377c sid: 759b1d419a
cid: 9398c3d0203ab15f1dfeb5aa8f81e52888c32008 sid: 77cc0d3310
cid: 93f4ba09ab08a9ef997db4fa37a97dbf2b4c5481 sid: f7db9dce32
cid: 93744f4bedf95e04dd6607592ecf775825403093 sid: e264d714d2
cid: 93256308e3d349f8839dec840b0a90c7e7a1fc20 sid: 618b07791f
Appendix B. Acknowledgments
Appendix C. Change Log
*RFC Editor's Note:* Please remove this section prior to
publication of a final version of this document.
C.1. since-draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers-03
* Improved Config Rotation text
* Added stream cipher test vectors
* Deleted the Obfuscated CID algorithm
C.2. since-draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers-02
* Replaced stream cipher algorithm with three-pass version
* Updated Retry format to encode info for required TPs
* Added discussion of version invariance
* Cleaned up text about config rotation
* Added Reset Oracle and limited configuration considerations
* Allow dropped long-header packets for known QUIC versions
C.3. since-draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers-01
* Test vectors for load balancer decoding
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
* Deleted remnants of in-band protocol
* Light edit of Retry Services section
* Discussed load balancer chains
C.4. since-draft-ietf-quic-load-balancers-00
* Removed in-band protocol from the document
C.5. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-06
* Switch to IETF WG draft.
C.6. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-05
* Editorial changes
* Made load balancer behavior independent of QUIC version
* Got rid of token in stream cipher encoding, because server might
not have it
* Defined "non-compliant DCID" and specified rules for handling
them.
* Added psuedocode for config schema
C.7. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-04
* Added standard for retry services
C.8. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-03
* Renamed Plaintext CID algorithm as Obfuscated CID
* Added new Plaintext CID algorithm
* Updated to allow 20B CIDs
* Added self-encoding of CID length
C.9. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-02
* Added Config Rotation
* Added failover mode
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft QUIC-LB August 2020
* Tweaks to existing CID algorithms
* Added Block Cipher CID algorithm
* Reformatted QUIC-LB packets
C.10. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-01
* Complete rewrite
* Supports multiple security levels
* Lightweight messages
C.11. Since draft-duke-quic-load-balancers-00
* Converted to markdown
* Added variable length connection IDs
Authors' Addresses
Martin Duke
F5 Networks, Inc.
Email: martin.h.duke@gmail.com
Nick Banks
Microsoft
Email: nibanks@microsoft.com
Duke & Banks Expires 15 February 2021 [Page 30]