%% You should probably cite rfc7930 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-radext-bigger-packets-04,
    number =    {draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets-04},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets/04/},
    author =    {Sam Hartman},
    title =     {{Larger Packets for RADIUS over TCP}},
    pagetotal = 9,
    year =      2015,
    month =     oct,
    day =       19,
    abstract =  {The RADIUS over TLS experiment described in RFC 6614 has opened RADIUS to new use cases where the 4096-octet maximum size limit of RADIUS packet proves problematic. This specification extends the RADIUS over TCP experiment (RFC 6613) to permit larger RADIUS packets. This specification compliments other ongoing work to permit fragmentation of RADIUS authorization information. This document registers a new RADIUS code, an action which requires IESG approval.},
}