Skip to main content

RADIUS Extension for Digest Authentication
draft-ietf-radext-digest-auth-09

Yes

(Allison Mankin)
(David Kessens)

No Objection

(Alex Zinin)
(Bill Fenner)
(Brian Carpenter)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Mark Townsley)
(Sam Hartman)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Ted Hardie)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.

Allison Mankin Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
David Kessens Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2005-12-15) Unknown
Page 26
      NAS-IP-Address = a 0 45 26 (10.0.69.38)
Probably IP address should be changed to be in accordance with
IP addresses for examples (RFC3330), i.e. 192.0.2.0/24 range
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes) No Objection
No Objection (2005-12-14) Unknown
The authors might note, contrary to impllication of the motivational text in 1.2, that RFC3261 did not intend to supplant Digest authentication with TLS and S/MIME. Digest is still mandatory and is the preferred way for a UA to authenticate itself to a proxy server. This just furthers the need for this mechanism, of course - the text in 1.2 makes it sound like Digest a legacy mechanism for SIP.
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2005-12-15) Unknown
  Please include an informative reference for CHAP in section 1.3.

  Section 3.1 says:
  >
  > The RADIUS server MAY have added a Digest-Nextnonce attribute into an
  > Access-Accept packet.  If the RADIUS client discovers this, it puts
  > the contents of this attribute into a 'nextnonce' directive.  Now it
  > can send an HTTP-style response.
  >
  Perhaps a better wording might be:
  >
  > When the RADIUS server provides a Digest-Nextnonce attribute in the
  > Access-Accept packet, the RADIUS client puts the contexts of this
  > attribute into a 'nextnonce' directive so that it can send an
  > HTTP-style response.

  Section 4.9 says:
  >
  >4.9.  Digest-Algorithm attribute
  >
  >   Type
  >
  s/Type/Description/

  Section 4.20 says:
  >
  >4.20.  SIP-AOR
  >
  >   Type
  >
  s/Type/Description/

  Section 7 says:
  >
  > A->B
  >
  >    INVITE sip:97226491335@example.com SIP/2.0
  >    Proxy-Authorization: Digest algorithm="md5",nonce="3bada1a0"
  >         ,opaque="",realm="example.com"
  >         ,response="f3ce87e6984557cd0fecc26f3c5e97a4"
  >         ,uri="sip:97226491335@10.0.69.38",username="12345678"
  >    From: <sip:12345678@example.com>
  >    To: <sip:97226491335@example.com>
  >
  > B->C
  >
  >    Code = 1 (Access-Request)
  >    Attributes:
  >    NAS-IP-Address = a 0 45 26 (10.0.69.38)
  >    NAS-Port-Type = 5 (Virtual)
  >    User-Name = "12345678"
  >    Digest-Response = "f3ce87e6984557cd0fecc26f3c5e97a4"
  >    Digest-Realm = "example.com"
  >    Digest-Nonce = "3bada1a0"
  >    Digest-Method = "INVITE"
  >    Digest-URI = "sip:97226491335@example.com"
  >
  Why is the value of Digest-URI not the same URI provided by A?
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown