%% You should probably cite rfc7499 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-00, number = {draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-00}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation/00/}, author = {Alejandro Pérez-Méndez and Rafael Marin-Lopez and Fernando Pereniguez-Garcia and Gabriel Lopez-Millan and Diego R. Lopez and Alan DeKok}, title = {{Support of fragmentation of RADIUS packets}}, pagetotal = 25, year = 2013, month = aug, day = 27, abstract = {The Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) protocol is limited to a total packet size of 4096 octets. Provisions exist for fragmenting large amounts of authentication data across multiple packets, via Access-Challenge. No similar provisions exist for fragmenting large amounts of authorization data. This document specifies how existing RADIUS mechanisms can be leveraged to provide that functionality. These mechanisms are largely compatible with existing implementations, and are designed to be invisible to proxies, and "fail-safe" to legacy clients and servers.}, }