%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-radext-radiusv11-11 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-radext-radiusv11-10,
    number =    {draft-ietf-radext-radiusv11-10},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-radiusv11/10/},
    author =    {Alan DeKok},
    title =     {{RADIUS ALPN and removing MD5}},
    pagetotal = 40,
    year =      2024,
    month =     jul,
    day =       1,
    abstract =  {This document defines Application-Layer Protocol Negotiation Extensions for use with RADIUS/TLS and RADIUS/DTLS. These extensions permit the negotiation of an additional application protocol for RADIUS over (D)TLS. No changes are made to RADIUS/UDP or RADIUS/TCP. The extensions allow the negotiation of a transport profile where the RADIUS shared secret is no longer used, and all MD5-based packet signing and attribute obfuscation methods are removed. This document updates RFC2865, RFC2866, RFC5176, RFC6613, RFC6614, and RFC 7360.},
}