A YANG Data Model for Challenge-Response-based Remote Attestation Procedures using TPMs
draft-ietf-rats-yang-tpm-charra-05
The information below is for an old version of the document.
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Henk Birkholz , Michael Eckel , Shwetha Bhandari , Eric Voit , Bill Sulzen , Liang Xia , Tom Laffey , Guy Fedorkow | ||
| Last updated | 2021-01-14 | ||
| Replaces | draft-birkholz-rats-basic-yang-module | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews |
YANGDOCTORS Last Call review
(of
-07)
by Mahesh Jethanandani
On the Right Track
YANGDOCTORS Early review
(of
-03)
by Mahesh Jethanandani
On the Right Track
|
||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ietf-rats-yang-tpm-charra-05
RATS Working Group H. Birkholz
Internet-Draft M. Eckel
Intended status: Standards Track Fraunhofer SIT
Expires: July 18, 2021 S. Bhandari
ThoughtSpot
E. Voit
B. Sulzen
Cisco
L. Xia
Huawei
T. Laffey
HPE
G. Fedorkow
Juniper
January 14, 2021
A YANG Data Model for Challenge-Response-based Remote Attestation
Procedures using TPMs
draft-ietf-rats-yang-tpm-charra-05
Abstract
This document defines a YANG RPC and a minimal datastore required to
retrieve attestation evidence about integrity measurements from a
device following the operational context defined in TPM-based Network
Device Remote Integrity Verification. Complementary measurement logs
are also provided by the YANG RPC originating from one or more roots
of trust of measurement. The module defined requires at least one
TPM 1.2 or TPM 2.0 and corresponding Trusted Software Stack included
in the device components of the composite device the YANG server is
running on.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
This Internet-Draft will expire on July 18, 2021.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Requirements notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. The YANG Module for Basic Remote Attestation Procedures . . . 3
2.1. YANG Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1.1. ietf-tpm-remote-attestation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1.2. ietf-tcg-algs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3. IANA considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
5. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
6. Change Log . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
1. Introduction
This document is based on the terminology defined in the
[I-D.ietf-rats-architecture] and uses the operational context defined
in [I-D.ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest] as well as the
interaction model and information elements defined in
[I-D.ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models]. The currently
supported hardware security modules (HWM) are the Trusted Platform
Module (TPM) [TPM1.2] and [TPM2.0] specified by the Trusted Computing
Group (TCG). One ore more TPMs embedded in the components of a
composite device - sometimes also referred to as an aggregate device
- are required in order to use the YANG module defined in this
document. A TPM is used as a root of trust for reporting (RTR) in
order to retrieve attestation evidence from a composite device (quote
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
primitive operation). Additionally, it is used as a root of trust
for storage (RTS) in order to retain shielded secrets and store
system measurements using a folding hash function (extend primitive
operation).
1.1. Requirements notation
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
2. The YANG Module for Basic Remote Attestation Procedures
One or more TPMs MUST be embedded in the composite device that is
providing attestation evidence via the YANG module defined in this
document. The ietf-basic-remote-attestation YANG module enables a
composite device to take on the role of Claimant and Attester in
accordance with the Remote Attestation Procedures (RATS) architecture
[I-D.ietf-rats-architecture] and the corresponding challenge-response
interaction model defined in the
[I-D.ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models] document. A fresh nonce
with an appropriate amount of entropy MUST be supplied by the YANG
client in order to enable a proof-of-freshness with respect to the
attestation evidence provided by the attester running the YANG
datastore. The functions of this YANG module are restricted to 0-1
TPMs per hardware component.
2.1. YANG Modules
2.1.1. ietf-tpm-remote-attestation
This YANG module imports modules from [RFC6991], [RFC8348],
[I-D.ietf-netconf-keystore], ietf-tcg-algs.yang Section 2.1.2.3.
2.1.1.1. Features
This module supports the following features:
<TPMs> - Indicates that multiple TPMs on the device can support
remote attestation, This feature is applicable in cases where
multiple line cards, each with its own TPM.
<bios> - Indicates the device supports the retrieval of bios event
logs.
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
<ima> - Indicates the device supports the retrieval of Integrity
Measurement Architecture event logs.
<netequip_boot> - Indicates the device supports the retrieval of
netequip boot event logs.
2.1.1.2. Identities
This module supports the following types of attestation event logs:
<ima>, <bios>, and <netequip_boot>.
2.1.1.3. RPCs
2.1.1.3.1. <tpm20-challenge-response-attestation>
This RPC allows a Verifier to request a quote of PCRs from a TPM2.0
compliant cryptoprocessor. Where the feature <TPMs> is active, and
one or more <certificate-name> is not provided, all TPM2.0 compliant
cryptoprocessors will respond. A YANG tree diagram of this RPC is as
follows:
+---x tpm20-challenge-response-attestation {taa:TPM20}?
+---w input
| +---w tpm20-attestation-challenge
| +---w nonce-value binary
| +---w tpm20-pcr-selection* []
| | +---w TPM20-hash-algo? identityref
| | +---w pcr-index* tpm:pcr
| +---w certificate-name* certificate-name-ref {tpm:TPMs}?
+--ro output
+--ro tpm20-attestation-response* []
+--ro certificate-name certificate-name-ref
+--ro TPMS_QUOTE_INFO binary
+--ro quote-signature? binary
+--ro up-time? uint32
+--ro unsigned-pcr-values* []
+--ro TPM20-hash-algo? identityref
+--ro pcr-values* [pcr-index]
+--ro pcr-index pcr
+--ro pcr-value? binary
An example of an RPC challenge requesting PCRs 0-7 from a SHA256 bank
could look like the following:
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
<rpc message-id="101" xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
<tpm20-challenge-response-attestation>
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tpm-remote-attestation">
<nonce>110101010110011011111001010010100</nonce>
<tpm20-pcr-selection>
<TPM20-hash-algo
xmlns:taa="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tcg-algs">
taa:TPM_ALG_SHA256
</TPM20-hash-algo>
<pcr-index>0</pcr-index>
<pcr-index>1</pcr-index>
<pcr-index>2</pcr-index>
<pcr-index>3</pcr-index>
<pcr-index>4</pcr-index>
<pcr-index>5</pcr-index>
<pcr-index>6</pcr-index>
<pcr-index>7</pcr-index>
</tpm20-pcr-selection>
</tpm20-challenge-response-attestation>
</rpc>
and a successful response might be formated as follows:
<rpc-reply message-id="101"
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0">
<tpm12-attestation-response
xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tpm-remote-attestation">
<certificate-name
xmlns:ks=urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-keystore>
ks:(instance of Certificate name in the Keystore)
</certificate-name>
<TPMS_QUOTE_INFO>
(raw information from the TPM Quote, this includes a digest
across the requested PCRs, the nonce, TPM2 time counters.)
</TPMS_QUOTE_INFO>
<quote-signature>
(signature across TPMS_QUOTE_INFO)
</quote-signature>
</tpm12-attestation-response>
</rpc-reply>
2.1.1.4. <tpm12-challenge-response-attestation>
This RPC allows a Verifier to request a quote of PCRs from a TPM1.2
compliant cryptoprocessor. Where the feature <TPMs> is active, and
one or more <certificate-name> is not provided, all TPM1.2 compliant
cryptoprocessors will respond. A YANG tree diagram of this RPC is as
follows:
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
+---x tpm12-challenge-response-attestation {taa:TPM12}?
+---w input
| +---w tpm12-attestation-challenge
| +---w pcr-index* pcr
| +---w nonce-value binary
| +---w certificate-name* certificate-name-ref {tpm:TPMs}?
+--ro output
+--ro tpm12-attestation-response* []
+--ro certificate-name certificate-name-ref
+--ro up-time? uint32
+--ro TPM_QUOTE2? binary
2.1.1.5. <log-retrieval>
This RPC allows a Verifier to acquire the evidence which was extended
into specific PCRs. A YANG tree diagram of this RPC is as follows:
+---x log-retrieval
+---w input
| +---w log-selector* []
| | +---w tpm-name* string
| | +---w (index-type)?
| | | +--:(last-entry)
| | | | +---w last-entry-value? binary
| | | +--:(index)
| | | | +---w last-index-number? uint64
| | | +--:(timestamp)
| | | +---w timestamp? yang:date-and-time
| | +---w log-entry-quantity? uint16
| +---w log-type identityref
+--ro output
+--ro system-event-logs
+--ro node-data* []
+--ro tpm-name? string
+--ro up-time? uint32
+--ro log-result
+--ro (attested_event_log_type)
+--:(bios)
| +--ro bios-event-logs
| +--ro bios-event-entry* [event-number]
| +--ro event-number uint32
| +--ro event-type? uint32
| +--ro pcr-index? pcr
| +--ro digest-list* []
| | +--ro hash-algo? identityref
| | +--ro digest* binary
| +--ro event-size? uint32
| +--ro event-data* uint8
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
+--:(ima)
| +--ro ima-event-logs
| +--ro ima-event-entry* [event-number]
| +--ro event-number uint64
| +--ro ima-template? string
| +--ro filename-hint? string
| +--ro filedata-hash? binary
| +--ro filedata-hash-algorithm? string
| +--ro template-hash-algorithm? string
| +--ro template-hash? binary
| +--ro pcr-index? pcr
| +--ro signature? binary
+--:(netequip_boot)
+--ro boot-event-logs
+--ro boot-event-entry* [event-number]
+--ro event-number uint64
+--ro filename-hint? string
+--ro filedata-hash? binary
+--ro filedata-hash-algorithm? string
+--ro file-version? string
+--ro file-type? string
+--ro pcr-index? pcr
2.1.1.6. Data Nodes
This section provides a high level description of the data nodes
containing the configuration and operational objects with the YANG
model. For more details, please see the YANG model itself in
Section 2.1.1.7.
container <rats-support-structures> - This houses the set of
information relating to a device's TPM(s).
container <tpms> - Provides configuration and operational details for
each supported TPM, including the tpm-firmware-version, PCRs which
may be quoted, certificates which are associated with that TPM, and
the current operational status. Of note is the certificates which
are associated with that TPM. As a certificate is associated with a
single Attestation key, knowledge of the certificate allows a
specific TPM to be identified.
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
+--rw tpms
+--rw tpm* [tpm-name]
+--rw tpm-name string
+--ro hardware-based? boolean
+--ro tpm-physical-index? int32 {ietfhw:entity-mib}?
+--ro tpm-path? string
+--ro compute-node compute-node-ref {tpm:TPMs}?
+--ro tpm-manufacturer? string
+--rw tpm-firmware-version identityref
+--rw TPM12-hash-algo? identityref
+--rw TPM12-pcrs* pcr
+--rw tpm20-pcr-bank* [TPM20-hash-algo]
| +--rw TPM20-hash-algo identityref
| +--rw pcr-index* tpm:pcr
+--ro tpm-status enumeration
+--rw certificates
+--rw certificate* [certificate-name]
+--rw certificate-name string
+--rw certificate-keystore-ref? -> /ks:keystore/asymmetric-keys/asymmetric-key/certificates/certificate/name
+--rw certificate-type? enumeration
container <attester-supported-algos> - Identifies which TCG
algorithms are available for use the Attesting platform. This allows
an operator to limit algorithms available for use by RPCs to just a
desired set from the universe of all allowed by TCG.
+--rw attester-supported-algos
+--rw tpm12-asymmetric-signing* identityref {taa:TPM12}?
+--rw tpm12-hash* identityref {taa:TPM12}?
+--rw tpm20-asymmetric-signing* identityref {taa:TPM20}?
+--rw tpm20-hash* identityref {taa:TPM20}?
container <compute-nodes> - When there is more than one TPM
supported, this container maintains the set of information related to
the compute associated with a specific TPM. This allows each
specific TPM to identify on which <compute-node> it belongs.
+--rw compute-nodes {tpm:TPMs}?
+--ro compute-node* [node-id]
+--ro node-id string
+--ro node-physical-index? int32 {ietfhw:entity-mib}?
+--ro node-name? string
+--ro node-location? string
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
2.1.1.7. YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> file ietf-tpm-remote-attestation@2020-12-17.yang
module ietf-tpm-remote-attestation {
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tpm-remote-attestation";
prefix "tpm";
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
}
import ietf-hardware {
prefix ietfhw;
}
import ietf-keystore {
prefix ks;
}
import ietf-tcg-algs {
prefix taa;
}
organization
"IETF RATS (Remote ATtestation procedureS) Working Group";
contact
"WG Web : <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rats/>
WG List : <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
Author : Eric Voit <evoit@cisco.com>
Author : Henk Birkholz <henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Author : Michael Eckel <michael.eckel@sit.fraunhofer.de>
Author : Shwetha Bhandari <shwetha.bhandari@thoughtspot.com>
Author : Bill Sulzen <bsulzen@cisco.com>
Author : Liang Xia (Frank) <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>
Author : Tom Laffey <tom.laffey@hpe.com>
Author : Guy Fedorkow <gfedorkow@juniper.net>";
description
"A YANG module to enable a TPM 1.2 and TPM 2.0 based
remote attestation procedure using a challenge-response
interaction model and the TPM 1.2 and TPM 2.0 Quote
primitive operations.
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified
as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with
or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and
subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified
BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set
forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC
itself for full legal notices.
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL',
'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED',
'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document
are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119)
(RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.";
revision "2020-12-15" {
description
"Initial version";
reference
"draft-ietf-rats-yang-tpm-charra";
}
/*****************/
/* Features */
/*****************/
feature TPMs {
description
"The device supports the remote attestation of multiple
TPM based cryptoprocessors.";
}
/*****************/
/* Typedefs */
/*****************/
typedef pcr {
type uint8 {
range "0..31";
}
description
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
"Valid index number for a PCR. At this point 0-31 is viable.";
}
typedef compute-node-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tpm:rats-support-structures/tpm:compute-nodes" +
"/tpm:compute-node/tpm:node-name";
}
description
"This type is used to reference a hardware node. It is quite
possible this leafref will eventually point to another YANG
module's node.";
}
typedef certificate-name-ref {
type leafref {
path "/tpm:rats-support-structures/tpm:tpms/tpm:tpm" +
"/tpm:certificates/tpm:certificate/tpm:certificate-name";
}
description
"A type which allows identification of a TPM based certificate.";
}
/******************/
/* Identities */
/******************/
identity attested_event_log_type {
description
"Base identity allowing categorization of the reasons why and
attested measurement has been taken on an Attester.";
}
identity ima {
base attested_event_log_type;
description
"An event type recorded in IMA.";
}
identity bios {
base attested_event_log_type;
description
"An event type associated with BIOS/UEFI.";
}
identity netequip_boot {
base attested_event_log_type;
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
description
"An event type associated with Network Equipment Boot.";
}
/*****************/
/* Groupings */
/*****************/
grouping TPM20-asymmetric-signing-algo {
description
"The signature scheme that is used to sign the TPM2 Quote
information response.";
leaf TPM20-asymmetric-signing-algo {
must "/tpm:rats-support-structures/tpm:attester-supported-algos"
+ "/tpm:tpm20-asymmetric-signing" {
error-message "Not a platform supported " +
"TPM20-asymmetric-signing-algo";
}
type identityref {
base taa:asymmetric;
}
description
"The signature scheme that is used to sign the TPM2.0
Quote information response. This must be one of those
supported by a platform.";
default taa:TPM_ALG_RSA;
}
}
grouping TPM12-asymmetric-signing-algo {
description
"The signature scheme that is used to sign the TPM12 Quote
information response.";
leaf TPM12-asymmetric-signing-algo {
must "/tpm:rats-support-structures/tpm:attester-supported-algos"
+ "/tpm:tpm12-asymmetric-signing" {
error-message "Not a platform supported " +
"TPM12-asymmetric-signing-algo";
}
type identityref {
base taa:asymmetric;
}
description
"The signature scheme that is used to sign the TPM1.2
Quote information response. This must be one of those
supported by a platform.";
default taa:TPM_ALG_RSA;
}
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
}
grouping TPM20-hash-algo {
description
"The cryptographic algorithm used to hash the TPM2 PCRs. This
must be from the list of platform supported options.";
leaf TPM20-hash-algo {
must "/tpm:rats-support-structures/tpm:attester-supported-algos"
+ "/tpm:tpm20-hash" {
error-message "Not a platform supported TPM20-hash-algo";
}
type identityref {
base taa:hash;
}
description
"The hash scheme that is used to hash a TPM1.2 PCR. This
must be one of those supported by a platform.";
default taa:TPM_ALG_SHA256;
}
}
grouping TPM12-hash-algo {
description
"The cryptographic algorithm used to hash the TPM1.2 PCRs.";
leaf TPM12-hash-algo {
must "/tpm:rats-support-structures/tpm:attester-supported-algos"
+ "/tpm:tpm12-hash" {
error-message "Not a platform supported TPM12-hash-algo";
}
type identityref {
base taa:hash;
}
description
"The hash scheme that is used to hash a TPM1.2 PCR. This
must be one of those supported by a platform. This assumes
that an algorithm other than SHA1 can be supported on some
TPM1.2 cryptoprocessor variant.";
default taa:TPM_ALG_SHA1;
}
}
grouping nonce {
description
"A nonce to show freshness and to allow the detection
of replay attacks.";
leaf nonce-value {
type binary;
mandatory true;
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
description
"This nonce SHOULD be generated via a registered
cryptographic-strength algorithm. In consequence,
the length of the nonce depends on the hash algorithm
used. The algorithm used in this case is independent
from the hash algorithm used to create the hash-value
in the response of the attestor.";
}
}
grouping tpm12-pcr-selection {
description
"A Verifier can request one or more PCR values using its
individually created Attestation Key Certificate (AC).
The corresponding selection filter is represented in this
grouping.
Requesting a PCR value that is not in scope of the AC used,
detailed exposure via error msg should be avoided.";
leaf-list pcr-index {
/* the following XPATH must be updated to ensure that only
selectable PCRs are allowed in the RPC
must "/tpm:rats-support-structures/tpm:tpms" +
"/tpm:tpm[tpm-name = current()]" +
"/tpm:tpm[TPM12-pcrs = current()]" {
error-message "Acquiring this PCR index is not supported";
}
*/
type pcr;
description
"The numbers/indexes of the PCRs. At the moment this is limited
to 32.";
}
}
grouping tpm20-pcr-selection {
description
"A Verifier can acquire one or more PCR values, which are hashed
together in a TPM2B_DIGEST coming from the TPM2. The selection
list of desired PCRs and the Hash Algorithm is represented in
this grouping.";
list tpm20-pcr-selection {
unique "TPM20-hash-algo";
description
"Specifies the list of PCRs and Hash Algorithms that can be
returned within a TPM2B_DIGEST.";
reference
"https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/
TPM-Rev-2.0-Part-2-Structures-01.38.pdf Section 10.9.7";
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
uses TPM20-hash-algo;
leaf-list pcr-index {
/* the following XPATH must be updated to ensure that only
selectable PCRs are allowed in the RPC
must "/tpm:rats-support-structures/tpm:tpms" +
"/tpm:tpm[tpm-name = current()]" +
"/tpm:tpm20-pcr-bank[pcr-index = current()]" {
error-message "Acquiring this PCR index is not supported";
}
*/
type tpm:pcr;
description
"The numbers of the PCRs that which are being tracked
with a hash based on the TPM20-hash-algo.";
}
}
}
grouping certificate-name-ref {
description
"Identifies a certificate in a keystore.";
leaf certificate-name {
type certificate-name-ref;
description
"Identifies a certificate in a keystore.";
mandatory true;
}
}
grouping tpm-name {
description
"A unique TPM on a device.";
leaf tpm-name {
type string;
description
"Unique system generated name for a TPM on a device.";
}
}
grouping tpm-name-selector {
description
"One or more TPM on a device.";
leaf-list tpm-name {
type string;
config false;
description
"Name of one or more unique TPMs on a device. If this object
exists, a selection should pull only the objects related to
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
these TPM(s). If it does not exist, all qualifying TPMs that
are 'hardware-based' equals true on the device are selected.";
}
}
grouping node-uptime {
description
"Uptime in seconds of the node.";
leaf up-time {
type uint32;
description
"Uptime in seconds of this node reporting its data";
}
}
grouping tpm12-attestation {
description
"Contains an instance of TPM1.2 style signed cryptoprocessor
measurements. It is supplemented by unsigned Attester
information.";
uses node-uptime;
leaf TPM_QUOTE2 {
type binary;
description
"Result of a TPM1.2 Quote2 operation. This includes PCRs,
signatures, locality, the provided nonce and other data which
can be further parsed to appraise the Attester.";
reference
"TPM1.2 commands rev116 July 2007, Section 16.5";
}
}
grouping tpm20-attestation {
description
"Contains an instance of TPM2 style signed cryptoprocessor
measurements. It is supplemented by unsigned Attester
information.";
leaf TPMS_QUOTE_INFO {
mandatory true;
type binary;
description
"A hash of the latest PCR values (and the hash algorithm used)
which have been returned from a Verifier for the selected PCRs
and Hash Algorithms.";
reference
"https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/
TPM-Rev-2.0-Part-2-Structures-01.38.pdf Section 10.12.1";
}
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
leaf quote-signature {
type binary;
description
"Quote signature returned by TPM Quote. The signature was
generated using the key associated with the
certificate-name.";
}
uses node-uptime;
list unsigned-pcr-values {
description
"PCR values in each PCR bank. This might appear redundant with
the TPM2B_DIGEST, but that digest is calculated across multiple
PCRs. Having to verify across multiple PCRs does not
necessarily make it easy for a Verifier to appraise just the
minimum set of PCR information which has changed since the last
received TPM2B_DIGEST. Put another way, why should a Verifier
reconstruct the proper value of all PCR Quotes when only a
single PCR has changed?
To help this happen, if the Attester does know specific PCR
values, the Attester can provide these individual values via
'unsigned-pcr-values'. By comparing this information to the
what has previously been validated, it is possible for a
Verifier to confirm the Attester's signature while eliminating
significant processing.";
uses TPM20-hash-algo;
list pcr-values {
key pcr-index;
description
"List of one PCR bank.";
leaf pcr-index {
type pcr;
description
"PCR index number.";
}
leaf pcr-value {
type binary;
description
"PCR value.";
}
}
}
}
grouping log-identifier {
description
"Identifier for type of log to be retrieved.";
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
leaf log-type {
type identityref {
base attested_event_log_type;
}
mandatory true;
description
"The corresponding measurement log type identity.";
}
}
grouping boot-event-log {
description
"Defines an event log corresponding to the event that extended
the PCR";
leaf event-number {
type uint32;
description
"Unique event number of this event";
}
leaf event-type {
type uint32;
description
"log event type";
}
leaf pcr-index {
type pcr;
description
"Defines the PCR index that this event extended";
}
list digest-list {
description
"Hash of event data";
leaf hash-algo {
type identityref {
base taa:hash;
}
description
"The hash scheme that is used to compress the event data in
each of the leaf-list digest items.";
}
leaf-list digest {
type binary;
description
"The hash of the event data";
}
}
leaf event-size {
type uint32;
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
description
"Size of the event data";
}
leaf-list event-data {
type uint8;
description
"The event data size determined by event-size";
}
}
grouping bios-event-log {
description
"Measurement log created by the BIOS/UEFI.";
list bios-event-entry {
key event-number;
description
"Ordered list of TCG described event log
that extended the PCRs in the order they
were logged";
uses boot-event-log;
}
}
grouping ima-event {
description
"Defines an hash log extend event for IMA measurements";
leaf event-number {
type uint64;
description
"Unique number for this event for sequencing";
}
leaf ima-template {
type string;
description
"Name of the template used for event logs
for e.g. ima, ima-ng, ima-sig";
}
leaf filename-hint {
type string;
description
"File that was measured";
}
leaf filedata-hash {
type binary;
description
"Hash of filedata";
}
leaf filedata-hash-algorithm {
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
type string;
description
"Algorithm used for filedata-hash";
}
leaf template-hash-algorithm {
type string;
description
"Algorithm used for template-hash";
}
leaf template-hash {
type binary;
description
"hash(filedata-hash, filename-hint)";
}
leaf pcr-index {
type pcr;
description
"Defines the PCR index that this event extended";
}
leaf signature {
type binary;
description
"The file signature";
}
}
grouping ima-event-log {
description
"Measurement log created by IMA.";
list ima-event-entry {
key event-number;
description
"Ordered list of ima event logs by event-number";
uses ima-event;
}
}
grouping netequip-boot-event {
description
"Defines an hash log extend event for Network Equipment Boot.";
leaf event-number {
type uint64;
description
"Unique number for this event for sequencing";
}
leaf filename-hint {
type string;
description
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
"File that was measured";
}
leaf filedata-hash {
type binary;
description
"Hash of filedata";
}
leaf filedata-hash-algorithm {
type string;
description
"Algorithm used for filedata-hash.";
}
leaf file-version {
type string;
description
"File version information.";
}
leaf file-type {
type string;
description
"Indicating at which boot stage the file is loaded,
such as BIOS, BootLoader, etc.";
}
leaf pcr-index {
type pcr;
description
"Defines the PCR index that this event extended";
}
}
grouping network-equipment-boot-event-log {
description
"Measurement log created by Network Equipment Boot.";
list boot-event-entry {
key event-number;
description
"Ordered list of Network Equipment Boot event logs
by event-number.";
uses netequip-boot-event;
}
}
grouping event-logs {
description
"A selector for the log and its type.";
choice attested_event_log_type {
mandatory true;
description
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
"Event log type determines the event logs content.";
case bios {
description
"BIOS/UEFI event logs";
container bios-event-logs {
description
"BIOS/UEFI event logs";
uses bios-event-log;
}
}
case ima {
description
"IMA event logs.";
container ima-event-logs {
description
"IMA event logs.";
uses ima-event-log;
}
}
case netequip_boot {
description
"Network Equipment Boot event logs";
container boot-event-logs {
description
"Network equipment boot event logs.";
uses network-equipment-boot-event-log;
}
}
}
}
/**********************/
/* RPC operations */
/**********************/
rpc tpm12-challenge-response-attestation {
if-feature "taa:TPM12";
description
"This RPC accepts the input for TSS TPM 1.2 commands made to the
attesting device.";
input {
container tpm12-attestation-challenge {
description
"This container includes every information element defined
in the reference challenge-response interaction model for
remote attestation. Corresponding values are based on
TPM 1.2 structure definitions";
uses tpm12-pcr-selection;
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
uses nonce;
leaf-list certificate-name {
if-feature "tpm:TPMs";
must "/tpm:rats-support-structures/tpm:tpms" +
"/tpm:tpm[tpm:tpm-firmware-version='taa:tpm12']" +
"/tpm:certificates/" +
"/tpm:certificate[certificate-name-ref=current()]" {
error-message "Not an available TPM1.2 AIK certificate.";
}
type certificate-name-ref;
description
"When populated, the RPC will only get a Quote for the
TPMs associated with these certificate(s).";
}
}
}
output {
list tpm12-attestation-response {
unique "certificate-name";
description
"The binary output of TPM 1.2 TPM_Quote/TPM_Quote2, including
the PCR selection and other associated attestation evidence
metadata";
uses certificate-name-ref {
description
"Certificate associated with this tpm12-attestation.";
}
uses tpm12-attestation;
}
}
}
rpc tpm20-challenge-response-attestation {
if-feature "taa:TPM20";
description
"This RPC accepts the input for TSS TPM 2.0 commands of the
managed device. ComponentIndex from the hardware manager YANG
module to refer to dedicated TPM in composite devices,
e.g. smart NICs, is still a TODO.";
input {
container tpm20-attestation-challenge {
description
"This container includes every information element defined
in the reference challenge-response interaction model for
remote attestation. Corresponding values are based on
TPM 2.0 structure definitions";
uses nonce;
uses tpm20-pcr-selection;
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
leaf-list certificate-name {
if-feature "tpm:TPMs";
must "/tpm:rats-support-structures/tpm:tpms" +
"/tpm:tpm[tpm:tpm-firmware-version='taa:tpm20']" +
"/tpm:certificates/" +
"/tpm:certificate[certificate-name-ref=current()]" {
error-message "Not an available TPM2.0 AIK certificate.";
}
type certificate-name-ref;
description
"When populated, the RPC will only get a Quote for the
TPMs associated with the certificates.";
}
}
}
output {
list tpm20-attestation-response {
unique "certificate-name";
description
"The binary output of TPM2b_Quote in one TPM chip of the
node which identified by node-id. An TPMS_ATTEST structure
including a length, encapsulated in a signature";
uses certificate-name-ref {
description
"Certificate associated with this tpm20-attestation.";
}
uses tpm20-attestation;
}
}
}
rpc log-retrieval {
description
"Logs Entries are either identified via indices or via providing
the last line received. The number of lines returned can be
limited. The type of log is a choice that can be augmented.";
input {
list log-selector {
description
"Selection of log entries to be reported.";
uses tpm-name-selector;
choice index-type {
description
"Last log entry received, log index number, or timestamp.";
case last-entry {
description
"The last entry of the log already retrieved.";
leaf last-entry-value {
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
type binary;
description
"Content of an log event which matches 1:1 with a
unique event record contained within the log. Log
entries subsequent to this will be passed to the
requester. Note: if log entry values are not unique,
this MUST return an error.";
}
}
case index {
description
"Numeric index of the last log entry retrieved, or
zero.";
leaf last-index-number {
type uint64;
description
"The last numeric index number of a log entry.
Zero means to start at the beginning of the log.
Entries subsequent to this will be passed to the
requester.";
}
}
case timestamp {
leaf timestamp {
type yang:date-and-time;
description
"Timestamp from which to start the extraction. The
next log entry subsequent to this timestamp is to
be sent.";
}
description
"Timestamp from which to start the extraction.";
}
}
leaf log-entry-quantity {
type uint16;
description
"The number of log entries to be returned. If omitted, it
means all of them.";
}
}
uses log-identifier;
}
output {
container system-event-logs {
description
"The requested data of the measurement event logs";
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 25]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
list node-data {
unique "tpm-name";
description
"Event logs of a node in a distributed system
identified by the node name";
uses tpm-name;
uses node-uptime;
container log-result {
description
"The requested entries of the corresponding log.";
uses event-logs;
}
}
}
}
}
/**************************************/
/* Config & Oper accessible nodes */
/**************************************/
container rats-support-structures {
description
"The datastore definition enabling verifiers or relying
parties to discover the information necessary to use the
remote attestation RPCs appropriately.";
container compute-nodes {
if-feature "tpm:TPMs";
description
"Holds the set device subsystems/components in this composite
device that support TPM operations.";
list compute-node {
key node-id;
config false;
min-elements 2;
description
"A component in this composite device that
supports TPM operations.";
leaf node-id {
type string;
description
"ID of the compute node, such as Board Serial Number.";
}
leaf node-physical-index {
if-feature ietfhw:entity-mib;
type int32 {
range "1..2147483647";
}
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 26]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
config false;
description
"The entPhysicalIndex for the compute node.";
reference
"RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalIndex";
}
leaf node-name {
type string;
description
"Name of the compute node.";
}
leaf node-location {
type string;
description
"Location of the compute node, such as slot number.";
}
}
}
container tpms {
description
"Holds the set of TPMs within an Attester.";
list tpm {
key tpm-name;
unique "tpm-path";
description
"A list of TPMs in this composite device that RATS
can be conducted with.";
uses tpm-name;
leaf hardware-based {
type boolean;
config false;
description
"Answers the question: is this TPM is a hardware based
TPM?";
}
leaf tpm-physical-index {
if-feature ietfhw:entity-mib;
type int32 {
range "1..2147483647";
}
config false;
description
"The entPhysicalIndex for the TPM.";
reference
"RFC 6933: Entity MIB (Version 4) - entPhysicalIndex";
}
leaf tpm-path {
type string;
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 27]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
config false;
description
"Path to a unique TPM on a device. This can change agross
reboots.";
}
leaf compute-node {
if-feature "tpm:TPMs";
type compute-node-ref;
config false;
mandatory true;
description
"When there is more that one TPM, this indicates for which
compute node this TPM services.";
}
leaf tpm-manufacturer {
type string;
config false;
description
"TPM manufacturer name.";
}
leaf tpm-firmware-version {
type identityref {
base taa:cryptoprocessor;
}
mandatory true;
description
"Identifies the cryptoprocessor API set supported. This
cannot be configured. However it is referenced via XPATH
as part of configuration, so is shown as 'rw'
to eliminate YANG warnings related NMDA.";
}
uses TPM12-hash-algo {
when "tpm-firmware-version = 'taa:tpm12'";
refine TPM12-hash-algo {
description
"The hash algorithm overwrites the default used for PCRs
on this TPM1.2 compliant cryptoprocessor.";
}
}
leaf-list TPM12-pcrs {
when "../tpm-firmware-version = 'taa:tpm12'";
type pcr;
description
"The PCRs which may be extracted from this TPM1.2
compliant cryptoprocessor.";
}
list tpm20-pcr-bank {
when "../tpm-firmware-version = 'taa:tpm20'";
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 28]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
key "TPM20-hash-algo";
description
"Specifies the list of PCRs that may be extracted for
a specific Hash Algorithm on this TPM2 compliant
cryptoprocessor. A bank is a set of PCRs which are
extended using a particular hash algorithm.";
reference
"https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/
TPM-Rev-2.0-Part-2-Structures-01.38.pdf Section 10.9.7";
leaf TPM20-hash-algo {
must "/tpm:rats-support-structures"
+ "/tpm:attester-supported-algos"
+ "/tpm:tpm20-hash" {
error-message "Not a platform supported TPM20-hash-algo";
}
type identityref {
base taa:hash;
}
description
"The hash scheme actively being used to hash a
one or more TPM2.0 PCRs.";
}
leaf-list pcr-index {
type tpm:pcr;
description
"Defines what TPM2 PCRs are available to be extracted.";
}
}
leaf tpm-status {
type enumeration {
enum operational {
value 0;
description
"The TPM currently is currently running normally and
is ready to accept and process TPM quotes.";
reference
"TPM-Rev-2.0-Part-1-Architecture-01.07-2014-03-13.pdf
Section 12";
}
enum non-operational {
value 1;
description
"TPM is in a state such as startup or shutdown which
precludes the processing of TPM quotes.";
}
}
config false;
mandatory true;
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 29]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
description
"TPM chip self-test status.";
}
container certificates {
description
"The TPM's certificates, including EK certificates
and AK certificates.";
list certificate {
key "certificate-name";
description
"Three types of certificates can be accessed via
this statement, including Initial Attestation
Key Cert, Local Attestation Key Cert or
Endorsement Key Cert.";
leaf certificate-name {
type string;
description
"An arbitrary name uniquely identifying a certificate
associated within key within a TPM.";
}
leaf certificate-keystore-ref {
type leafref {
path "/ks:keystore/ks:asymmetric-keys/ks:asymmetric-key"
+ "/ks:certificates/ks:certificate/ks:name";
}
description
"A reference to a specific certificate of an
asymmetric key in the Keystore.";
/* Note: It is also possible to import a grouping which
allows local definition via an imported keystore
schema. */
}
leaf certificate-type {
type enumeration {
enum endorsement-cert {
value 0;
description
"Endorsement Key (EK) Certificate type.";
}
enum initial-attestation-cert {
value 1;
description
"Initial Attestation key (IAK) Certificate type.";
}
enum local-attestation-cert {
value 2;
description
"Local Attestation Key (LAK) Certificate type.";
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 30]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
}
}
description
"Type of this certificate";
}
}
}
}
}
container attester-supported-algos {
description
"Identifies which TPM algorithms are available for use on an
attesting platform.";
leaf-list tpm12-asymmetric-signing {
if-feature "taa:TPM12";
when "../../tpm:tpms" +
"/tpm:tpm[tpm:tpm-firmware-version='taa:tpm12']";
type identityref {
base taa:asymmetric;
}
description
"Platform Supported TPM12 asymmetric algorithms.";
}
leaf-list tpm12-hash {
if-feature "taa:TPM12";
when "../../tpm:tpms" +
"/tpm:tpm[tpm:tpm-firmware-version='taa:tpm12']";
type identityref {
base taa:hash;
}
description
"Platform supported TPM12 hash algorithms.";
}
leaf-list tpm20-asymmetric-signing {
if-feature "taa:TPM20";
when "../../tpm:tpms" +
"/tpm:tpm[tpm:tpm-firmware-version='taa:tpm20']";
type identityref {
base taa:asymmetric;
}
description
"Platform Supported TPM20 asymmetric algorithms.";
}
leaf-list tpm20-hash {
if-feature "taa:TPM20";
when "../../tpm:tpms" +
"/tpm:tpm[tpm:tpm-firmware-version='taa:tpm20']";
type identityref {
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 31]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
base taa:hash;
}
description
"Platform supported TPM20 hash algorithms.";
}
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
2.1.2. ietf-tcg-algs
Cryptographic algorithm types were initially included within -v14
NETCONF's iana-crypto-types.yang. Unfortunately all this content
including the algorithms needed here failed to make the -v15 used
WGLC. As a result this document has encoded the TCG Algorithm
definitions of [TCG-Algos], revision 1.32. By including this full
table as a separate YANG file within this document, it is possible
for other YANG models to leverage the contents of this model.
2.1.2.1. Features
There are two types of features supported <TPM12> and <TPM20>.
Support for either of these features indicates that a cryptoprocessor
supporting the corresponding type of TCG API is present on an
Attester. Most commonly, only one type of cryptoprocessor will be
available on an Attester.
2.1.2.2. Identities
There are three types of identities in this model.
The first are the cryptographic functions supportable by a TPM
algorithm, these include: <asymmetric>, <symmetric>, <hash>,
<signing>, <anonymous_signing>, <encryption_mode>, <method>, and
<object_type>. The definitions of each of these are in Table 2 of
[TCG-Algos].
The second are API specifications for tpms: <tpm12> and <tpm2>.
The third are specific algorithm types. Each algorithm type defines
what cryptographic functions may be supported, and on which type of
API specification. It is not required that an implementation of a
specific TPM will support all algorithm types. The contents of each
specific algorithm mirrors what is in Table 3 of [TCG-Algos].
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 32]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
2.1.2.3. YANG Module
<CODE BEGINS> ietf-tcg-algs@2020-09-18.yang
module ietf-tcg-algs {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-tcg-algs";
prefix taa;
organization
"IETF RATS Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/rats/>
WG List: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
Author: Eric Voit <mailto:evoit@cisco.com>";
description
"This module defines a identities for asymmetric algorithms.
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified
as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with
or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and
subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified
BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's
Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC
itself for full legal notices.
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL',
'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED',
'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document
are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119)
(RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.";
revision 2020-09-18 {
description
"Initial version";
reference
"RFC XXXX: tbd";
}
/*****************/
/* Features */
/*****************/
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 33]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
feature TPM12 {
description
"This feature indicates algorithm support for the TPM 1.2 API
as per TPM-main-1.2-Rev94-part-2, Section 4.8.";
}
feature TPM20 {
description
"This feature indicates algorithm support for the TPM 2.0 API
as per TPM-Rev-2.0-Part-1-Architecture-01.38 Section 11.4.";
}
/*****************/
/* Identities */
/*****************/
/* There needs to be collasping/verification of some of the identity
types between the various algorithm types listed below */
identity asymmetric {
description
"A TCG recognized asymmetric algorithm with a public and
private key.";
reference
"http://trustedcomputinggroup.org/resource/tcg-algorithm-registry/
TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 2";
}
identity symmetric {
description
"A TCG recognized symmetric algorithm with only a private key.";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 2";
}
identity hash {
description
"A TCG recognized hash algorithm that compresses input data to
a digest value or indicates a method that uses a hash.";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 2";
}
identity signing {
description
"A TCG recognized signing algorithm";
reference
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 34]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 2";
}
identity anonymous_signing {
description
"A TCG recognized anonymous signing algorithm.";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 2";
}
identity encryption_mode {
description
"A TCG recognized encryption mode.";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 2";
}
identity method {
description
"A TCG recognized method such as a mask generation function.";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 2";
}
identity object_type {
description
"A TCG recognized object type.";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 2";
}
identity cryptoprocessor {
description
"Base identity identifying a crytoprocessor.";
}
identity tpm12 {
if-feature "TPM12";
base cryptoprocessor;
description
"Supportable by a TPM1.2.";
reference
"TPM-Main-Part-2-TPM-Structures_v1.2_rev116_01032011.pdf
TPM_ALGORITHM_ID values, page 18";
}
identity tpm20 {
if-feature "TPM12";
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 35]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
base cryptoprocessor;
description
"Supportable by a TPM2.";
reference
"TPM-Rev-2.0-Part-2-Structures-01.38.pdf
The TCG Algorithm Registry. Table 9";
}
identity TPM_ALG_RSA {
if-feature "TPM12 or TPM20";
base tpm12;
base tpm20;
base asymmetric;
base object_type;
description
"RSA algorithm";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
RFC 8017. ALG_ID: 0x0001";
}
identity TPM_ALG_TDES {
if-feature "TPM12";
base tpm12;
base symmetric;
description
"Block cipher with various key sizes (Triple Data Encryption
Algorithm, commonly called Triple Data Encryption Standard)
Note: was banned in TPM1.2 v94";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 18033-3. ALG_ID: 0x0003";
}
identity TPM_ALG_SHA1 {
if-feature "TPM12 or TPM20";
base hash;
base tpm12;
base tpm20;
description
"SHA1 algorithm - Deprecated due to insufficient cryptographic
protection. However it is still useful for hash algorithms
where protection is not required.";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 10118-3. ALG_ID: 0x0004";
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 36]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
}
identity TPM_ALG_HMAC {
if-feature "TPM12 or TPM20";
base tpm12;
base tpm20;
base hash;
base signing;
description
"Hash Message Authentication Code (HMAC) algorithm";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3,
ISO/IEC 9797-2 and RFC2014. ALG_ID: 0x0005";
}
identity TPM_ALG_AES {
if-feature "TPM12";
base tpm12;
base symmetric;
description
"The AES algorithm with various key sizes";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 18033-3. ALG_ID: 0x0006";
}
identity TPM_ALG_MGF1 {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base hash;
base method;
description
"hash-based mask-generation function";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3,
IEEE Std 1363-2000 and IEEE Std 1363a -2004.
ALG_ID: 0x0007";
}
identity TPM_ALG_KEYEDHASH {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base hash;
base object_type;
description
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 37]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
"An encryption or signing algorithm using a keyed hash. These
may use XOR for encryption or an HMAC for signing and may
also refer to a data object that is neither signing nor
encrypting.";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
TCG TPM 2.0 library specification. . ALG_ID: 0x0008";
}
identity TPM_ALG_XOR {
if-feature "TPM12 or TPM20";
base tpm12;
base tpm20;
base hash;
base symmetric;
description
"The XOR encryption algorithm.";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
TCG TPM 2.0 library specification. ALG_ID: 0x000A";
}
identity TPM_ALG_SHA256 {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base hash;
description
"The SHA 256 algorithm";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 10118-3. ALG_ID: 0x000B";
}
identity TPM_ALG_SHA384 {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base hash;
description
"The SHA 384 algorithm";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 10118-3. ALG_ID: 0x000C";
}
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 38]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
identity TPM_ALG_SHA512 {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base hash;
description
"The SHA 512 algorithm";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 10118-3. ALG_ID: 0x000D";
}
identity TPM_ALG_NULL {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
description
"NULL algorithm";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
TCG TPM 2.0 library specification. ALG_ID: 0x0010";
}
identity TPM_ALG_SM3_256 {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base hash;
description
"The SM3 hash algorithm.";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
GM/T 0004-2012 - SM3_256. ALG_ID: 0x0012";
}
identity TPM_ALG_SM4 {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base symmetric;
description
"SM4 symmetric block cipher";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
GB/T 32907-2016. ALG_ID: 0x0013";
}
identity TPM_ALG_RSASSA {
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 39]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base asymmetric;
base signing;
description
"Signature algorithm defined in section 8.2 (RSASSAPKCS1-v1_5)";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and RFC 8017.
ALG_ID: 0x0014";
}
identity TPM_ALG_RSAES {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base asymmetric;
base encryption_mode;
description
"Signature algorithm defined in section 7.2 (RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5)";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and RFC 8017
ALG_ID: 0x0015";
}
identity TPM_ALG_RSAPSS {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base asymmetric;
base signing;
description
"Padding algorithm defined in section 8.1 (RSASSA PSS)";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and RFC 8017.
ALG_ID: 0x0016";
}
identity TPM_ALG_OAEP {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base asymmetric;
base encryption_mode;
description
"Padding algorithm defined in section 7.1 (RSASSA OAEP)";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and RFC 8017.
ALG_ID: 0x0017";
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 40]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
}
identity TPM_ALG_ECDSA {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base asymmetric;
base signing;
description
"Signature algorithm using elliptic curve cryptography (ECC)";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 14888-3. ALG_ID: 0x0018";
}
identity TPM_ALG_ECDH {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base asymmetric;
base method;
description
"Secret sharing using ECC";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
NIST SP800-56A and RFC 7748. ALG_ID: 0x0019";
}
identity TPM_ALG_ECDAA {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base asymmetric;
base signing;
base anonymous_signing;
description
"Elliptic-curve based anonymous signing scheme";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
TCG TPM 2.0 library specification. ALG_ID: 0x001A";
}
identity TPM_ALG_SM2 {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base asymmetric;
base signing;
base encryption_mode;
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 41]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
base method;
description
"SM2 - depending on context, either an elliptic-curve based,
signature algorithm, an encryption scheme, or a key exchange
protocol";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
A GM/T 0003.1-2012, GM/T 0003.2-2012, GM/T 0003.3-2012,
GM/T 0003.5-2012 SM2. ALG_ID: 0x001B";
}
identity TPM_ALG_ECSCHNORR {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base asymmetric;
base signing;
description
"Elliptic-curve based Schnorr signature";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
TCG TPM 2.0 library specification. ALG_ID: 0x001C";
}
identity TPM_ALG_ECMQV {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base asymmetric;
base method;
description
"Two-phase elliptic-curve key";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
NIST SP800-56A. ALG_ID: 0x001D";
}
identity TPM_ALG_KDF1_SP800_56A {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base hash;
base method;
description
"Concatenation key derivation function";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
NIST SP800-56A (approved alternative1) section 5.8.1.
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 42]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
ALG_ID: 0x0020";
}
identity TPM_ALG_KDF2 {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base hash;
base method;
description
"Key derivation function";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
IEEE 1363a-2004 KDF2 section 13.2. ALG_ID: 0x0021";
}
identity TPM_ALG_KDF1_SP800_108 {
base TPM_ALG_KDF2;
description
"A key derivation method";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
NIST SP800-108 - Section 5.1 KDF. ALG_ID: 0x0022";
}
identity TPM_ALG_ECC {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base asymmetric;
base object_type;
description
"Prime field ECC";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 15946-1. ALG_ID: 0x0023";
}
identity TPM_ALG_SYMCIPHER {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
description
"Object type for a symmetric block cipher";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
TCG TPM 2.0 library specification. ALG_ID: 0x0025";
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 43]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
}
identity TPM_ALG_CAMELLIA {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base symmetric;
description
"The Camellia algorithm";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 18033-3. ALG_ID: 0x0026";
}
identity TPM_ALG_SHA3_256 {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base hash;
description
"ISO/IEC 10118-3 - the SHA 256 algorithm";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
NIST PUB FIPS 202. ALG_ID: 0x0027";
}
identity TPM_ALG_SHA3_384 {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base hash;
description
"The SHA 384 algorithm";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
NIST PUB FIPS 202. ALG_ID: 0x0028";
}
identity TPM_ALG_SHA3_512 {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base hash;
description
"The SHA 512 algorithm";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
NIST PUB FIPS 202. ALG_ID: 0x0029";
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 44]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
}
identity TPM_ALG_CMAC {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base symmetric;
base signing;
description
"block Cipher-based Message Authentication Code (CMAC)";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 9797-1:2011 Algorithm 5. ALG_ID: 0x003F";
}
identity TPM_ALG_CTR {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base symmetric;
base encryption_mode;
description
"Counter mode";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 10116. ALG_ID: 0x0040";
}
identity TPM_ALG_OFB {
base tpm20;
base symmetric;
base encryption_mode;
description
"Output Feedback mode";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 10116. ALG_ID: 0x0041";
}
identity TPM_ALG_CBC {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base symmetric;
base encryption_mode;
description
"Cipher Block Chaining mode";
reference
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 45]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 10116. ALG_ID: 0x0042";
}
identity TPM_ALG_CFB {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base symmetric;
base encryption_mode;
description
"Cipher Feedback mode";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 10116. ALG_ID: 0x0043";
}
identity TPM_ALG_ECB {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base symmetric;
base encryption_mode;
description
"Electronic Codebook mode";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
ISO/IEC 10116. ALG_ID: 0x0044";
}
identity TPM_ALG_CCM {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base symmetric;
base signing;
base encryption_mode;
description
"Counter with Cipher Block Chaining-Message Authentication
Code (CCM)";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
NIST SP800-38C. ALG_ID: 0x0050";
}
identity TPM_ALG_GCM {
if-feature "TPM20";
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 46]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
base tpm20;
base symmetric;
base signing;
base encryption_mode;
description
"Galois/Counter Mode (GCM)";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
NIST SP800-38D. ALG_ID: 0x0051";
}
identity TPM_ALG_KW {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base symmetric;
base signing;
base encryption_mode;
description
"AES Key Wrap (KW)";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
NIST SP800-38F. ALG_ID: 0x0052";
}
identity TPM_ALG_KWP {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base symmetric;
base signing;
base encryption_mode;
description
"AES Key Wrap with Padding (KWP)";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
NIST SP800-38F. ALG_ID: 0x0053";
}
identity TPM_ALG_EAX {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base symmetric;
base signing;
base encryption_mode;
description
"Authenticated-Encryption Mode";
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 47]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
NIST SP800-38F. ALG_ID: 0x0054";
}
identity TPM_ALG_EDDSA {
if-feature "TPM20";
base tpm20;
base asymmetric;
base signing;
description
"Edwards-curve Digital Signature Algorithm (PureEdDSA)";
reference
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub Table 3 and
RFC 8032. ALG_ID: 0x0060";
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
Note that not all cryptographic functions are required for use by
ietf-tpm-remote-attestation.yang. However the full definition of
Table 3 of [TCG-Algos] will allow use by additional YANG
specifications.
3. IANA considerations
This document will include requests to IANA:
To be defined yet. But keeping up with changes to ietf-tcg-algs.yang
will be necessary.
4. Security Considerations
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
[RFC8446].
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 48]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes
and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
Container: </rats-support-structures/attester-supported-algos>
o <tpm12-asymmetric-signing>, <tpm12-hash>, <tpm20-asymmetric-
signing>, and <tpm20-hash> all could be populated with algorithms
which are not supported by the underlying physical TPM installed
by the equipment vendor.
Container: </rats-support-structures/tpms>
o <tpm-name> - Although shown as 'rw', it is system generated
o <tpm20-pcr-bank> - It is possible to configure PCRs for extraction
which are not being extended by system software. This could
unnecessarily use TPM resources.
o <certificates> - It is possible to provision a certificate which
does not correspond to a Attestation Identity Key (AIK) within the
TPM.
RPC: <tpm12-challenge-response-attestation> - Need to verify that the
certificate is for an active AIK.
RPC: <tpm20-challenge-response-attestation> - Need to verify that the
certificate is for an active AIK.
RPC: <log-retrieval> - Pulling lots of logs can chew up system
resources.
5. Acknowledgements
Not yet.
6. Change Log
Changes from version 04 to version 05:
o YANG Dr comments covered
Changes from version 03 to version 04:
o TPM1.2 Quote1 eliminated
o YANG model simplifications so redundant info isn't exposed
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 49]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
Changes from version 02 to version 03:
o moved to tcg-algs
o cleaned up model to eliminate sources of errors
o removed key establishment RPC
o added lots of XPATH which must all be scrubbed still
o Descriptive text added on model contents.
Changes from version 01 to version 02:
o Extracted Crypto-types into a separate YANG file
o Mades the algorithms explicit, not strings
o Hash Algo as key the selected TPM2 PCRs
o PCR numbers are their own type
o Eliminated nested keys for node-id plus tpm-name
o Eliminated TPM-Name of "ALL"
o Added TPM-Path
Changes from version 00 to version 01:
o Addressed author's comments
o Extended complementary details about attestation-certificates
o Relabeled chunk-size to log-entry-quantity
o Relabeled location with compute-node or tpm-name where appropriate
o Added a valid entity-mib physical-index to compute-node and tpm-
name to map it back to hardware inventory
o Relabeled name to tpm_name
o Removed event-string in last-entry
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 50]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-netconf-keystore]
Watsen, K., "A YANG Data Model for a Keystore", draft-
ietf-netconf-keystore-20 (work in progress), August 2020.
[I-D.ietf-rats-architecture]
Birkholz, H., Thaler, D., Richardson, M., Smith, N., and
W. Pan, "Remote Attestation Procedures Architecture",
draft-ietf-rats-architecture-08 (work in progress),
December 2020.
[I-D.ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models]
Birkholz, H., Eckel, M., Newton, C., and L. Chen,
"Reference Interaction Models for Remote Attestation
Procedures", draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-
models-01 (work in progress), October 2020.
[I-D.ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest]
Fedorkow, G., Voit, E., and J. Fitzgerald-McKay, "TPM-
based Network Device Remote Integrity Verification",
draft-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest-06 (work
in progress), December 2020.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8348] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., Dong, J., and D. Romascanu, "A
YANG Data Model for Hardware Management", RFC 8348,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8348, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8348>.
[TCG-Algos]
"TCG_Algorithm_Registry_r1p32_pub", n.d.,
<hhttp://trustedcomputinggroup.org/resource/tcg-algorithm-
registry/>.
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 51]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
[TPM1.2] TCG, ., "TPM 1.2 Main Specification", October 2003,
<https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/resource/tpm-main-
specification/>.
[TPM2.0] TCG, ., "TPM 2.0 Library Specification", March 2013,
<https://trustedcomputinggroup.org/resource/tpm-library-
specification/>.
7.2. Informative References
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
Authors' Addresses
Henk Birkholz
Fraunhofer SIT
Rheinstrasse 75
Darmstadt 64295
Germany
Email: henk.birkholz@sit.fraunhofer.de
Michael Eckel
Fraunhofer SIT
Rheinstrasse 75
Darmstadt 64295
Germany
Email: michael.eckel@sit.fraunhofer.de
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 52]
Internet-Draft YANG-CHARRA for TPMs January 2021
Shwetha Bhandari
ThoughtSpot
Email: shwetha.bhandari@thoughtspot.com
Eric Voit
Cisco Systems
Email: evoit@cisco.com
Bill Sulzen
Cisco Systems
Email: bsulzen@cisco.com
Liang Xia (Frank)
Huawei Technologies
101 Software Avenue, Yuhuatai District
Nanjing, Jiangsu 210012
China
Email: Frank.Xialiang@huawei.com
Tom Laffey
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Email: tom.laffey@hpe.com
Guy C. Fedorkow
Juniper Networks
10 Technology Park Drive
Westford, Massachusetts 01886
Email: gfedorkow@juniper.net
Birkholz, et al. Expires July 18, 2021 [Page 53]