Skip to main content

Marker PDU Aligned Framing for TCP Specification
draft-ietf-rddp-mpa-08

Yes

(Lars Eggert)

No Objection

(Bill Fenner)
(Brian Carpenter)
(Cullen Jennings)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Kessens)
(Jari Arkko)
(Jon Peterson)
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Sam Hartman)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 08 and is now closed.

Lars Eggert Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Brian Carpenter Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Sam Hartman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
(was Abstain) No Objection
No Objection (2006-10-04) Unknown
This did not rise to the level of blocking, but I found this disquieting:


   (2a) only indicate a preference to not use CRCs on the explicit
       request of the system administrator, via an interface not defined
       in this spec.  The default configuration for a connection MUST be
       to use CRCs.

<snip>

   The decision for hosts to request CRC suppression MAY be made on an
   administrative basis for any path that provides equivalent protection
   from undetected errors as an end-to-end CRC32c.


Like many "consenting adults" statements in protocol documents, it leaves open
how the two consent.  The second statement also presumes path stability,
which seems a pretty dubious proposition for anything not limited to a single
link.


Nit:

AOne deterministic approach