JSON Responses for the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP)
draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis-05

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2021-03-23
05 (System) RFC Editor state changed to RFC-EDITOR from EDIT
2021-03-09
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2021-03-09
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2021-03-09
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2021-03-08
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2021-03-02
05 (System) RFC Editor state changed to EDIT
2021-03-02
05 (System) IESG state changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2021-03-02
05 (System) Announcement was received by RFC Editor
2021-03-02
05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2021-03-02
05 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2021-03-02
05 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2021-03-02
05 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2021-03-02
05 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2021-03-02
05 Barry Leiba IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup
2021-02-24
05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2021-02-24
05 Scott Hollenbeck New version available: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis-05.txt
2021-02-24
05 (System) Forced post of submission
2021-02-24
05 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>, Scott Hollenbeck <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
2021-02-24
05 Scott Hollenbeck Uploaded new revision
2021-02-19
04 Barry Leiba IESG comments have been responded to, and changes agreed.  Waiting for -05.
2021-02-18
04 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed from IESG Evaluation
2021-02-18
04 Éric Vyncke
[Ballot comment]
Thank you for the work put into this document. Due to lack of time, I only quickly browsed through this document but I …
2021-02-18
04 Éric Vyncke [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Éric Vyncke
2021-02-18
04 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Magnus Westerlund
2021-02-18
04 Murray Kucherawy
[Ballot comment]
I concur with Alissa's observation.  This is a "bis" document, after all.

Thanks for Section 11.

Section 10.1 is an update to an …
2021-02-18
04 Murray Kucherawy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Murray Kucherawy
2021-02-17
04 Warren Kumari
[Ballot comment]
In a shocking turn of events, and which will likely come as a complete surprise at this point, this should list that it …
2021-02-17
04 Warren Kumari [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Warren Kumari
2021-02-16
04 Benjamin Kaduk
[Ballot comment]
Should the errata against RFC 7483 in state "reported" be verified or
otherwise processed before this document gets approved?

My understanding (based on …
2021-02-16
04 Benjamin Kaduk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benjamin Kaduk
2021-02-16
04 Alvaro Retana [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alvaro Retana
2021-02-16
04 Alissa Cooper [Ballot comment]
The fact that this document obsoletes RFC 7483 should be indicated in the header, abstract, and introduction.
2021-02-16
04 Alissa Cooper [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper
2021-02-16
04 Deborah Brungard [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Deborah Brungard
2021-02-15
04 Erik Kline
[Ballot comment]
[[ comments ]]

[ section 5.4 ]

* <picorant>
  It seems a shame that the startAddress/endAddress keys are used with IPv6
  …
2021-02-15
04 Erik Kline [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Erik Kline
2021-02-15
04 Robert Wilton
[Ballot comment]
Hi,

Thank you for this update to RFC 7483.

A couple of minor comments:

In section 5.2.  The Nameserver Object Class:  It might …
2021-02-15
04 Robert Wilton [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Wilton
2021-02-14
04 Roman Danyliw
[Ballot comment]
Thank you to Rich Salz for the SECDIR review, and the discussion around it is appreciated.

** Section 3. handle.  Per “This value …
2021-02-14
04 Roman Danyliw [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Roman Danyliw
2021-02-08
04 Amy Vezza Placed on agenda for telechat - 2021-02-18
2021-02-08
04 Barry Leiba Ballot has been issued
2021-02-08
04 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2021-02-08
04 Barry Leiba Created "Approve" ballot
2021-02-08
04 Barry Leiba IESG state changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2021-02-08
04 (System) IANA Review state changed to IANA OK - Actions Needed from IANA - Review Needed
2021-02-08
04 Sabrina Tanamal
(Via drafts-lastcall@iana.org): IESG/Authors/WG Chairs:

The IANA Functions Operator has completed its review of draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis-04. If any part of this review is inaccurate, please let us …
2021-02-08
04 (System) IESG state changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2021-02-01
04 Rich Salz Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed: Has Nits. Reviewer: Rich Salz. Sent review to list.
2021-01-28
04 Joel Halpern Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Joel Halpern. Sent review to list.
2021-01-28
04 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Rich Salz
2021-01-28
04 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Rich Salz
2021-01-28
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern
2021-01-28
04 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Joel Halpern
2021-01-26
04 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Joel Jaeggli
2021-01-26
04 Gunter Van de Velde Request for Last Call review by OPSDIR is assigned to Joel Jaeggli
2021-01-25
04 Amy Vezza IANA Review state changed to IANA - Review Needed
2021-01-25
04 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out (ends 2021-02-08):

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: Jasdip Singh <jasdips@arin.net>, barryleiba@gmail.com, draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis@ietf.org, jasdips@arin.net, regext-chairs@ietf.org, …
2021-01-25
04 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2021-01-25
04 Barry Leiba Last call was requested
2021-01-25
04 Barry Leiba Last call announcement was generated
2021-01-25
04 Barry Leiba Ballot approval text was generated
2021-01-25
04 Barry Leiba IESG state changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2021-01-22
04 Barry Leiba Ballot writeup was changed
2021-01-22
04 Barry Leiba IESG state changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2021-01-11
04 Jasdip Singh
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? …
2021-01-11
04 Antoin Verschuren IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from In WG Last Call
2020-12-08
04 Antoin Verschuren IETF WG state changed to In WG Last Call from WG Document
2020-12-08
04 Antoin Verschuren Intended Status changed to Internet Standard from Proposed Standard
2020-12-07
04 James Galvin Need additional WG review to support the elevation in standards status
2020-12-07
04 James Galvin IETF WG state changed to WG Document from Submitted to IESG for Publication
2020-11-30
04 Barry Leiba Ballot writeup was changed
2020-11-30
04 Antoin Verschuren
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? …
2020-11-30
04 Antoin Verschuren Responsible AD changed to Barry Leiba
2020-11-30
04 Antoin Verschuren IETF WG state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
2020-11-30
04 Antoin Verschuren IESG state changed to Publication Requested from I-D Exists
2020-11-30
04 Antoin Verschuren IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2020-11-30
04 Antoin Verschuren Changed consensus to Yes from Unknown
2020-11-30
04 Antoin Verschuren Intended Status changed to Proposed Standard from None
2020-11-09
04 Jasdip Singh
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? …
2020-11-03
04 Jasdip Singh
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? …
2020-11-03
04 Jasdip Singh
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? …
2020-11-03
04 Jasdip Singh
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? …
2020-11-03
04 Jasdip Singh
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? …
2020-10-26
04 Antoin Verschuren IETF WG state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from WG Document
2020-10-21
04 Scott Hollenbeck New version available: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis-04.txt
2020-10-21
04 (System) New version approved
2020-10-21
04 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>, Scott Hollenbeck <shollenbeck@verisign.com>
2020-10-21
04 Scott Hollenbeck Uploaded new revision
2020-10-12
03 Scott Hollenbeck New version available: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis-03.txt
2020-10-12
03 (System) New version approved
2020-10-12
03 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Scott Hollenbeck <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
2020-10-12
03 Scott Hollenbeck Uploaded new revision
2020-09-14
02 Scott Hollenbeck New version available: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis-02.txt
2020-09-14
02 (System) New version approved
2020-09-14
02 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Scott Hollenbeck <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
2020-09-14
02 Scott Hollenbeck Uploaded new revision
2020-07-24
01 James Galvin Added to session: IETF-108: regext  Fri-1100
2020-06-30
01 Scott Hollenbeck New version available: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis-01.txt
2020-06-30
01 (System) New version approved
2020-06-30
01 (System) Request for posting confirmation emailed to previous authors: Scott Hollenbeck <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
2020-06-30
01 Scott Hollenbeck Uploaded new revision
2020-06-11
00 Jasdip Singh
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC? …
2020-06-09
00 Antoin Verschuren Notification list changed to Jasdip Singh <jasdips@arin.net>
2020-06-09
00 Antoin Verschuren Document shepherd changed to Jasdip Singh
2020-06-09
00 Antoin Verschuren This document now replaces draft-hollenbeck-regext-rfc7483bis instead of None
2020-06-08
00 Scott Hollenbeck New version available: draft-ietf-regext-rfc7483bis-00.txt
2020-06-08
00 (System) New version approved
2020-06-08
00 Scott Hollenbeck Request for posting confirmation emailed  to submitter and authors: Scott Hollenbeck <shollenbeck@verisign.com>, Andrew Newton <andy@hxr.us>
2020-06-08
00 Scott Hollenbeck Uploaded new revision