A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers
draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Active Internet-Draft (repute WG)
Last updated 2013-09-12 (latest revision 2013-08-29)
Replaces draft-kucherawy-reputation-vocab-identity
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status Proposed Standard
Formats plain text pdf html bibtex
Reviews
Stream WG state Submitted to IESG for Publication
Document shepherd Dave Crocker
Shepherd write-up Show (last changed 2013-05-25)
IESG IESG state Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD Pete Resnick
IESG note Suggest reading -model first.
Send notices to repute-chairs@tools.ietf.org, draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers@tools.ietf.org
IANA IANA review state IANA OK - Actions Needed
REPUTE Working Group                                       N. Borenstein
Internet-Draft                                                  Mimecast
Intended status: Standards Track                            M. Kucherawy
Expires: March 2, 2014                                   August 29, 2013

            A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers
                 draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09

Abstract

   This document defines a response set for describing assertions a
   reputation service provider can make about email identifers, for use
   in generating reputons.

Status of this Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on March 2, 2014.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2013 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Borenstein & Kucherawy    Expires March 2, 2014                 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft  Email Identifiers Reputation Response Set    August 2013

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   2.  Terminology and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     2.1.  Key Words . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     2.2.  Email Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     2.3.  Other Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
   3.  Discussion  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     3.1.  Assertions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
     3.2.  Response Set Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
     3.3.  Query Extensions  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
   4.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
     4.1.  Registration of 'email-id' Reputation Application . . . . . 5
   5.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
   6.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
     6.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
     6.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
   Appendix A.  Positive vs. Negative Assertions . . . . . . . . . . . 7
   Appendix B.  Acknowledgments  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
   Appendix C.  Public Discussion  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

Borenstein & Kucherawy    Expires March 2, 2014                 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft  Email Identifiers Reputation Response Set    August 2013

1.  Introduction

   This document specifies a response set for describing reputation of
   an email identifier.  A "response set" in this context is defined in
   [I-D.REPUTE-MODEL] and is used to describe assertions a reputation
   service provider can make about email identifiers as well as meta-
   data that can be included in such a reply beyond the base set
   specified there.

   An atomic reputation response is called a "reputon", defined in
   [I-D.REPUTE-MEDIA-TYPE].  That document also defines a media type to
   contain a reputon for transport, and also creates a registry for
   reputation applications and the interesting parameters of each.

2.  Terminology and Definitions

   This section defines terms used in the rest of the document.

2.1.  Key Words

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in [KEYWORDS].

2.2.  Email Definitions

   Commonly used definitions describing entities in the email
   architecture are defined and discussed in [EMAIL-ARCH].

2.3.  Other Definitions

   Other terms of importance in this document are defined in
   [I-D.REPUTE-MODEL], the base document for the reputation services
Show full document text