Skip to main content

Application Performance Measurement MIB
draft-ietf-rmonmib-apm-mib-12

Yes

(Bert Wijnen)

No Objection

(Alex Zinin)
(Allison Mankin)
(Bill Fenner)
(Harald Alvestrand)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Ned Freed)
(Randy Bush)
(Russ Housley)
(Steven Bellovin)
(Thomas Narten)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.

(Bert Wijnen; former steering group member) Yes

Yes ()

                            

(Alex Zinin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Allison Mankin; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Bill Fenner; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Harald Alvestrand; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Jon Peterson; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection (2003-10-02)
No further objection given Ted's DISCUSS. Considering that the optimal architecture envisioned by the document is one where there is an agent in every enterprise desktop reporting the target and outcome of all network transactions to a centralized server... there do seem to be serious end-user privacy concerns.

(Margaret Cullen; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ned Freed; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Randy Bush; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Russ Housley; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Steven Bellovin; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection ()

                            

(Ted Hardie; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection

No Objection (2003-09-30)
Going through the HTTP example in some detail, I found it hard to understand
how I would use this data in the presence of services built on top of HTTP.  The
URL matching algorithm seems designed to allow an administrator to say something
like "maps.cgi?" as a prefix will have a different exception processing than
"zipcode.cgi?".That seems reasonable for exception reporting, for some level
of understanding of the likely inputs.  apmThroughputExceptionMinTime
seems, however, seems likely to obscure more than it reveals, since it makes
a presumption about the "fixed" transaction costs.  The transaction costs
include things like handshake, which are dependent on outside factors and do not
seem to be fixed at all.

(Thomas Narten; former steering group member) No Objection

No Objection ()