%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-34 instead of this revision.
@techreport{ietf-roll-dao-projection-21,
    number =    {draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-21},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection/21/},
    author =    {Pascal Thubert and Rahul Jadhav and Matthew Gillmore},
    title =     {{Root initiated routing state in RPL}},
    pagetotal = 74,
    year =      ,
    month =     ,
    day =       ,
    abstract =  {This document extends RFC 6550, RFC 6553,and RFC 8138 to enable a RPL Root to install and maintain Projected Routes within its DODAG, along a selected set of nodes that may or may not include self, for a chosen duration. This potentially enables routes that are more optimized or resilient than those obtained with the classical distributed operation of RPL, either in terms of the size of a Routing Header or in terms of path length, which impacts both the latency and the packet delivery ratio.},
}