Skip to main content

Root-initiated Routing State in RPL
draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-40

Approval announcement
Draft of message to be sent after approval:

Announcement

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection@ietf.org, jgs@juniper.net, mariainesrobles@googlemail.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, roll-chairs@ietf.org, roll@ietf.org
Subject: Protocol Action: 'Root-initiated Routing State in RPL' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-40.txt)

The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Root-initiated Routing State in RPL'
  (draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-40.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks
Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Gunter Van de Velde, Jim Guichard and John
Scudder.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection/


Ballot Text

Technical Summary

   This document extends RFC 6550, RFC 6553, and RFC 8138 to enable a
   RPL Root to install and maintain Projected Routes within its DODAG.
   A Projected Route is one that is computed by a central entity, such
   as a Path Computation Engine (PCE) and installed in the routers that
   instantiate it, using the procedures defined here.  The routes are
   installed along a selected set of nodes that may or may not include
   itself, for a chosen duration.  This potentially enables routes that
   are more optimized or resilient than those obtained with the
   classical distributed operation of RPL, either in terms of the size
   of a Routing Header or in terms of path length, which impacts both
   the latency and the packet delivery ratio.

Working Group Summary

   The WG consensus as described in the shepherd writeup appears
   normal for the ROLL WG. 

Document Quality

   The shepherd writeup doesn't note any existing implementations:
   "No implementation known. Students presented interest to implement 
   in near future."

   This is, again, not out of the ordinary for this technology and
   WG.

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Ines Robles. The Responsible
   Area Director is John Scudder.

RFC Editor Note