%% You should probably cite rfc9009 instead of this I-D. @techreport{ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-17, number = {draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao-17}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-roll-efficient-npdao/17/}, author = {Rahul Jadhav and Pascal Thubert and Rabi Narayan Sahoo and Zhen Cao}, title = {{Efficient Route Invalidation}}, pagetotal = 23, year = 2019, month = oct, day = 30, abstract = {This document explains the problems associated with the current use of NPDAO messaging and also discusses the requirements for an optimized route invalidation messaging scheme. Further a new proactive route invalidation message called as "Destination Cleanup Object" (DCO) is specified which fulfills requirements of an optimized route invalidation messaging.}, }