Routing Requirements for Urban Low-Power and Lossy Networks
draft-ietf-roll-urban-routing-reqs-05
Yes
(Adrian Farrel)
(David Ward)
No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund)
(Mark Townsley)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
David Ward Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-12-18)
Unknown
I support Pasi's Discuss.
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-12-17)
Unknown
I'll be a bit surprised to see this have the security and reliability to control traffic lights.
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-12-18)
Unknown
I support Pasi's Discuss.
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-12-18)
Unknown
Also support Pasi's DISCUSS
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-12-18)
Unknown
I also support Pasi's discuss. I believe the emphasis on lightweight security mechanisms could be appropriate for sensor reporting in some cases, but I think that heavier mechanisms could be required for actuators and routers. The security considerations implies a least common denominator approach that will allow the admitted constraints of sensor components to dominate the correspondingly stronger components abilities and security requirements.