WebRTC Video Processing and Codec Requirements
draft-ietf-rtcweb-video-06
Yes
(Alissa Cooper)
(Terry Manderson)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Benoît Claise)
(Brian Haberman)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Martin Stiemerling)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -05)
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2015-06-09 for -05)
Unknown
Thanks for this, it is well written and easy to read. (It easily hides all the gnashing-of-teeth that went into it.) I've got just a couple of minor comments: -- section 3: "the video scan pattern for video codecs is Y’CbCr 4:2:0." At the risk of stepping way outside my expertise, I've generally heard that referred to as a (sub)sampling ratio. Is this talking about something different? -- 6.2, "max-mbps,..." Odd vertical spacing.
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2015-06-09 for -05)
Unknown
Thank you for producing this document. I'm only mildly familiar with this level of detail, and the document was clear, with pointers when I needed them. I'm honored to ballot Yes. I did have one question. In this text: Implementations MAY send and act upon "User data registered by Rec. ITU-T T.35" and "User data unregistered" messages. Even if they do not act on them, implementations MUST be prepared to receive such messages without any ill effects. Is that a usual thing to say? Perhaps it is, but I thought that might be understood.
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -05)
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-06-08 for -05)
Unknown
I do wonder that the Abstract and Introduction are both short, and, yet, give such different descriptions of the document as to make it look like two different documents. Given how short they are, perhaps it really is best to make them the same, no? Abstract: This specification provides the requirements and considerations for WebRTC applications to send and receive video across a network. It specifies the video processing that is required, as well as video codecs and their parameters. Introduction: This specification defines how the video is used and discusses special considerations for processing the video. It also covers the video- related algorithms WebRTC devices need to support.
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -05)
Unknown