%% You should probably cite draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework-04 instead of this revision. @techreport{ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework-02, number = {draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework-02}, type = {Internet-Draft}, institution = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force}, note = {Work in Progress}, url = {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-cl-framework/02/}, author = {Ning So and Dave McDysan and Eric Osborne and Lucy Yong and Curtis Villamizar}, title = {{Composite Link Framework in Multi Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)}}, pagetotal = 43, year = 2012, month = oct, day = 19, abstract = {This document specifies a framework for support of composite link in MPLS networks. A composite link consists of a group of homogenous or non-homogenous links that have the same forward adjacency and can be considered as a single TE link or an IP link in routing. A composite link relies on its component links to carry the traffic over the composite link. Applicability is described for a single pair of MPLS-capable nodes, a sequence of MPLS-capable nodes, or a set of layer networks connecting MPLS-capable nodes.}, }