Skip to main content

Encapsulation Considerations
draft-ietf-rtgwg-dt-encap-01

The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document Type
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Expired".
Expired & archived
Authors Erik Nordmark , Albert Tian , Jesse Gross , Jon Hudson , Larry Kreeger , Pankaj Garg , Patricia Thaler , Tom Herbert
Last updated 2016-09-22 (Latest revision 2016-03-21)
Replaces draft-rtg-dt-encap
RFC stream Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)
Formats
Reviews
Additional resources Mailing list discussion
Stream WG state WG Document
Document shepherd (None)
IESG IESG state Expired
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

The IETF Routing Area director has chartered a design team to look at common issues for the different data plane encapsulations being discussed in the NVO3 and SFC working groups and also in the BIER BoF, and also to look at the relationship between such encapsulations in the case that they might be used at the same time. The purpose of this design team is to discover, discuss and document considerations across the different encapsulations in the different WGs/BoFs so that we can reduce the number of wheels that need to be reinvented in the future.

Authors

Erik Nordmark
Albert Tian
Jesse Gross
Jon Hudson
Larry Kreeger
Pankaj Garg
Patricia Thaler
Tom Herbert

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)