Operational management of Loop Free Alternates
draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-00

The information below is for an old version of the document
Document Type Expired Internet-Draft (rtgwg WG)
Last updated 2013-11-14 (latest revision 2013-05-13)
Replaces draft-litkowski-rtgwg-lfa-manageability
Stream IETF
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Expired & archived
pdf htmlized bibtex
Reviews
Stream WG state WG Document
Document shepherd None
IESG IESG state Expired
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-rtgwg-lfa-manageability-00.txt

Abstract

Loop Free Alternates (LFA), as defined in RFC 5286 is an IP Fast ReRoute (IP FRR) mechanism enabling traffic protection for IP traffic (and MPLS LDP traffic by extension). Following first deployment experiences, this document provides operational feedback on LFA, highlights some limitations, and proposes a set of refinements to address those limitations. It also proposes required management specifications. This proposal is also applicable to remote LFA solution.

Authors

Stephane Litkowski (stephane.litkowski@orange.com)
Bruno Decraene (bruno.decraene@orange.com)
Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil@cisco.com)
Kamran Raza (skraza@cisco.com)

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)