%% You should probably cite rfc8518 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-08,
    number =    {draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa-08},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-multihomed-prefix-lfa/08/},
    author =    {Pushpasis Sarkar and Uma Chunduri and Shraddha Hegde and Jeff Tantsura and Hannes Gredler},
    title =     {{LFA selection for Multi-Homed Prefixes}},
    pagetotal = 18,
    year =      2018,
    month =     oct,
    day =       16,
    abstract =  {This document shares experience gained from implementing algorithms to determine Loop-Free Alternates (LFAs) for multi-homed prefixes. In particular, this document provides explicit inequalities that can be used to evaluate neighbors as a potential alternates for multi- homed prefixes. It also provides detailed criteria for evaluating potential alternates for external prefixes advertised by OSPF ASBRs. This documents updates and expands some of the "Routing Aspects" as specified in Section 6 of RFC 5286.},
}