Dynamic Networks to Hybrid Cloud DCs Problem Statement
draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-problem-statement-11
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Linda Dunbar , Andrew G. Malis , Christian Jacquenet , Mehmet Toy | ||
| Last updated | 2021-01-27 (Latest revision 2020-07-26) | ||
| Replaces | draft-dm-net2cloud-problem-statement | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews |
ARTART Last Call review
(of
-41)
by Rich Salz
Ready w/nits
TSVART Last Call review
(of
-32)
by Magnus Westerlund
Ready w/issues
INTDIR Early review
(of
-26)
by Benson Muite
Ready w/nits
RTGDIR Early review
(of
-22)
by Ines Robles
Has issues
OPSDIR Early review
(of
-22)
by Susan Hares
Has issues
SECDIR Early review
(of
-22)
by Deb Cooley
Has issues
DNSDIR Early review
(of
-22)
by Florian Obser
Ready w/nits
GENART Early review
(of
-21)
by Paul Kyzivat
Ready w/nits
|
||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes the problems that enterprises face today when interconnecting their branch offices with dynamic workloads in third party data centers (a.k.a. Cloud DCs). There can be many problems associated with network connecting to or among Clouds, many of which probably are out of the IETF scope. The objective of this document is to identify some of the problems that need additional work in IETF Routing area. Other problems are out of the scope of this document. This document focuses on the network problems that many enterprises face when they have workloads & applications & data split among different data centers, especially for those enterprises with multiple sites that are already interconnected by VPNs (e.g., MPLS L2VPN/L3VPN). Current operational problems are examined to determine whether there is a need to improve existing protocols or whether a new protocol is necessary to solve them.
Authors
Linda Dunbar
Andrew G. Malis
Christian Jacquenet
Mehmet Toy
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)