Remote-LFA Node Protection and Manageability
draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection-13
Yes
(Alia Atlas)
(Alvaro Retana)
No Objection
(Alissa Cooper)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Kathleen Moriarty)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Suresh Krishnan)
(Terry Manderson)
No Record
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 10 and is now closed.
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -10)
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -10)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-01-20 for -12)
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2017-01-16 for -10)
Unknown
Overall comment: This reads rather like an informational rfc; however given that rfc7490 is standards track, I guess that's fine. More specific comments: - More abbreviations could be spelled out to make it easier to read. - Not sure what section 3 tells me; but I'm also not an expert. - Also section 3: "As already specified in Section 2.3.4 to limit the computational overhead of the proposed approach, forward SPF computations MUST be run on a selected subset from the entire set of PQ-nodes computed in the network, with a finite limit on the number of PQ-nodes in the subset." I guess you don't need the upper case MUST here. - Also then in section 2.3.4: "To limit the computational overhead of the approach proposed, this document proposes that implementations MUST choose a subset from the entire set of PQ-nodes computed in the network, with a finite limit on the number of PQ-nodes in the subset." Saying "this doc recommends" and "MUST" in the same sentence seem inaccurate. - And also section 2.3.4: Could you maybe suggest or discuss an appropriate default value?
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -10)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Record
No Record
(2017-01-19 for -10)
Unknown
awaiting clearance of the ops review