Topology Independent Fast Reroute using Segment Routing
draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-07
Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Stephane Litkowski , Ahmed Bashandy , Clarence Filsfils , Pierre Francois , Bruno Decraene , Daniel Voyer | ||
Last updated | 2021-12-31 (Latest revision 2021-06-29) | ||
Replaces | draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Formats | |||
Reviews |
GENART Last Call review
(of
-13)
by Roni Even
Ready w/nits
INTDIR Early review
(of
-11)
by Antoine Fressancourt
Ready w/issues
OPSDIR Early review
(of
-11)
by Gyan Mishra
Serious Issues
|
||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
Document shepherd | Stewart Bryant | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | stewart.bryant@gmail.com |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document presents Topology Independent Loop-free Alternate Fast Re-route (TI-LFA), aimed at providing protection of node and adjacency segments within the Segment Routing (SR) framework. This Fast Re-route (FRR) behavior builds on proven IP-FRR concepts being LFAs, remote LFAs (RLFA), and remote LFAs with directed forwarding (DLFA). It extends these concepts to provide guaranteed coverage in any IGP network. A key aspect of TI-LFA is the FRR path selection approach establishing protection over the expected post-convergence paths from the point of local repair, dramatically reducing the operational need to control the tie-breaks among various FRR options.
Authors
Stephane Litkowski
Ahmed Bashandy
Clarence Filsfils
Pierre Francois
Bruno Decraene
Daniel Voyer
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)