RIB Extension YANG Data Model
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-11
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (rtgwg WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Acee Lindem , Yingzhen Qu | ||
| Last updated | 2022-05-09 | ||
| Replaces | draft-acee-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Yang Validation | 0 errors, 0 warnings | ||
| Reviews |
YANGDOCTORS Last Call review
(of
-06)
Ready with Nits
RTGDIR Last Call review
(of
-06)
Has Nits
YANGDOCTORS Last Call review
(of
-03)
Almost Ready
|
||
| Additional resources |
Yang catalog entry for ietf-rib-extension@2020-09-18.yang
Yang impact analysis for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend Mailing list discussion |
||
| Stream | WG state | In WG Last Call | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-11
Network Working Group A. Lindem
Internet-Draft Cisco Systems
Intended status: Standards Track Y. Qu
Expires: 10 November 2022 Futurewei
9 May 2022
RIB Extension YANG Data Model
draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-rib-extend-11
Abstract
A Routing Information Base (RIB) is a list of routes and their
corresponding administrative data and operational state.
RFC 8349 defines the basic building blocks for RIB, and this model
augments it to support multiple next-hops (aka, paths) for each route
as well as additional attributes.
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 10 November 2022.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components
extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as
described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are
provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Terminology and Notation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2.1. Tree Diagrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. Prefixes in Data Node Names . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3. Design of the Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.1. Tags and Preference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
3.2. Repair Path . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4. RIB Model Tree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
5. RIB Extension YANG Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Appendix A. Combined Tree Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Appendix B. ietf-rib-extension.yang example . . . . . . . . . . 20
Appendix C. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
1. Introduction
This document defines a YANG [RFC7950] data model which extends the
RIBs defined in ietf-routing YANG module [RFC8349] with more route
attributes.
A RIB is a collection of routes with attributes controlled and
manipulated by control-plane protocols. Each RIB contains only
routes of one address family [RFC8349]. Within a protocol, routes
are selected based on the metrics in use by that protocol, and the
protocol installs the routes to RIB. RIB selects the preferred
routes by comparing the route-preference (aka, administrative
distance) of the associated protocol.
The module defined in this document extends the RIBs to support more
route attributes, such as multiple next-hops, route metrics, and
administrative tags.
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
The YANG modules in this document conform to the Network Management
Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342].
2. Terminology and Notation
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
The following terms are defined in [RFC8342]:
* configuration
* system state
* operational state
The following terms are defined in [RFC7950]:
* action
* augment
* container
* container with presence
* data model
* data node
* leaf
* list
* mandatory node
* module
* schema tree
* RPC (Remote Procedure Call) operation
The following terms are defined in [RFC8349] Section 5.2:
* RIB
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
2.1. Tree Diagrams
Tree diagrams used in this document follow the notation defined in
[RFC8340].
2.2. Prefixes in Data Node Names
In this document, names of data nodes, actions, and other data model
objects are often used without a prefix, as long as it is clear from
the context in which YANG module each name is defined. Otherwise,
names are prefixed using the standard prefix associated with the
corresponding YANG module, as shown in Table 1.
+========+===========================+===========+
| Prefix | YANG module | Reference |
+========+===========================+===========+
| if | ietf-interfaces | [RFC8343] |
+--------+---------------------------+-----------+
| rt | ietf-routing | [RFC8349] |
+--------+---------------------------+-----------+
| v4ur | ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing | [RFC8349] |
+--------+---------------------------+-----------+
| v6ur | ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing | [RFC8349] |
+--------+---------------------------+-----------+
| inet | ietf-inet-types | [RFC6991] |
+--------+---------------------------+-----------+
Table 1: Prefixes and Corresponding YANG Modules
3. Design of the Model
The YANG module defined in this document augments the ietf-routing
YANG model defined in [RFC8349], which provides a basis for routing
system data model development. Together with YANG modules defined in
[RFC8349], a generic RIB YANG model is defined to implement and
monitor a RIB.
The models in [RFC8349] also define the basic configuration and
operational state for both IPv4 and IPv6 static routes. This
document provides augmentations for static routes to support multiple
next-hops and more next-hop attributes.
3.1. Tags and Preference
Individual route tags are supported at both the route and next-hop
level. A preference per next-hop is also supported for selection of
the most preferred reachable static route.
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
The following tree snapshot shows tag and preference which augment
static IPv4 unicast routes and IPv6 unicast routes next-hop.
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rt:static-routes/v4ur:ipv4
/v4ur:route/v4ur:next-hop/v4ur:next-hop-options
/v4ur:simple-next-hop:
+--rw preference? uint32
+--rw tag? uint32
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rt:static-routes/v4ur:ipv4
/v4ur:route/v4ur:next-hop/v4ur:next-hop-options
/v4ur:next-hop-list/v4ur:next-hop-list/v4ur:next-hop:
+--rw preference? uint32
+--rw tag? uint32
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rt:static-routes/v6ur:ipv6
/v6ur:route/v6ur:next-hop/v6ur:next-hop-options
/v6ur:simple-next-hop:
+--rw preference? uint32
+--rw tag? uint32
augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
/rt:control-plane-protocol/rt:static-routes/v6ur:ipv6
/v6ur:route/v6ur:next-hop/v6ur:next-hop-options
/v6ur:next-hop-list/v6ur:next-hop-list/v6ur:next-hop:
+--rw preference? uint32
+--rw tag? uint32
3.2. Repair Path
The IP Fast Reroute (IPFRR) pre-computes repair paths by routing
protocols [RFC5714], and the repair paths are installed in the RIB.
Each route in the RIB is augmented with repair paths if available,
and is shown in the following tree snapshot.
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
augment /rt:routing/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:routes/rt:route
/rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/rt:simple-next-hop:
+--ro repair-path
+--ro outgoing-interface? if:interface-state-ref
+--ro next-hop-address? inet:ip-address
+--ro metric? uint32
augment /rt:routing/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:routes/rt:route
/rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/rt:next-hop-list
/rt:next-hop-list/rt:next-hop:
+--ro repair-path
+--ro outgoing-interface? if:interface-state-ref
+--ro next-hop-address? inet:ip-address
+--ro metric? uint32
4. RIB Model Tree
The ietf-routing.yang tree with the augmentations herein is included
in Appendix A. The meaning of the symbols can be found in [RFC8340].
5. RIB Extension YANG Model
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-rib-extension@2021-10-17.yang"
module ietf-rib-extension {
yang-version "1.1";
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-rib-extension";
prefix rib-ext;
import ietf-inet-types {
prefix "inet";
reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
}
import ietf-interfaces {
prefix "if";
reference "RFC 8343: A YANG Data Model for Interface
Management (NMDA Version)";
}
import ietf-routing {
prefix "rt";
reference "RFC 8349: A YANG Data Model for Routing
Management (NMDA Version)";
}
import ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing {
prefix "v4ur";
reference "RFC 8349: A YANG Data Model for Routing
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
Management (NMDA Version)";
}
import ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing {
prefix "v6ur";
reference "RFC 8349: A YANG Data Model for Routing
Management (NMDA Version)";
}
organization
"IETF RTGWG - Routing Working Group";
contact
"WG Web: <http://datatracker.ietf.org/group/rtgwg/>
WG List: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
Author: Acee Lindem
<mailto:acee@cisco.com>
Author: Yingzhen Qu
<mailto:yingzhen.qu@futurewei.com>";
description
"This document defines a YANG data model which extends
the RIBs defined in ietf-routing YANG module with more
route attributes.
This YANG model conforms to the Network Management
Datastore Architecture (NDMA) as described in RFC 8342.
Copyright (c) 2021 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX;
see the RFC itself for full legal notices.";
revision 2021-10-17 {
description
"Initial Version";
reference
"RFC XXXX: A YANG Data Model for RIB Extensions.";
}
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
/* Groupings */
grouping rib-statistics {
description
"Statistics grouping used for RIB augmentation.";
container statistics {
config false;
description
"Container for RIB statistics.";
leaf total-routes {
type uint32;
description
"Total routes in the RIB";
}
leaf total-active-routes {
type uint32;
description
"Total active routes in the RIB. An active route is
preferred over other routes to the same destination
prefix.";
}
leaf total-route-memory {
type uint64;
units "bytes";
description
"Total memory for all routes in the RIB.";
}
list protocol-statistics {
description "RIB statistics per protocol.";
leaf protocol {
type identityref {
base rt:routing-protocol;
}
description "Routing protocol.";
}
leaf routes {
type uint32;
description
"Total routes for protocol in the RIB.";
}
leaf active-routes {
type uint32;
description
"Total active routes for protocol in the RIB. An active
route is preferred over other routes to the same
destination prefix.";
}
leaf route-memory {
type uint64;
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
units "bytes";
description
"Total memory for all routes for protocol in the RIB.";
}
}
}
}
grouping next-hop {
description
"Next-hop grouping";
leaf interface {
type if:interface-ref;
description
"Outgoing interface";
}
leaf address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"IPv4 or IPv6 Address of the next-hop.";
}
}
grouping attributes {
description
"Common attributes applicable to all routes.";
leaf metric {
type uint32;
description
"The metric is a numeric value indicating the cost
of the route from the perspective of the routing
protocol installing the route. In general, routes with
a lower metric installed by the same routing protocol
are lower cost to reach and are preferable to routes
with a higher metric. However, metrics from different
routing protocols are not directly comparable.";
}
leaf-list tag {
type uint32;
description
"A tag is a 32-bit opaque value associated with the
route that can be used for policy decisions such as
advertisement and filtering of the route.";
}
leaf application-tag {
type uint32;
description
"The application-specific tag is an additional tag that
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
can be used by applications that require semantics and/or
policy different from that of the tag. For example,
the tag is usually automatically advertised in OSPF
AS-External Link State Advertisements (LSAs) while this
application-specific tag is not advertised implicitly.";
}
}
grouping repair-path {
description
"Grouping for IP Fast Reroute repair path.";
container repair-path {
description
"IP Fast Reroute next-hop repair path.";
leaf outgoing-interface {
type if:interface-state-ref;
description
"Name of the outgoing interface.";
}
leaf next-hop-address {
type inet:ip-address;
description
"IP address of the next hop.";
}
leaf metric {
type uint32;
description
"The metric for the repair path. While the IP Fast
Reroute re-route repair is local and the metric is
not advertised externally, the metric for repair path
is useful for troubleshooting purposes.";
}
reference
"RFC 5714: IP Fast Reroute Framework.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rt:static-routes/v4ur:ipv4/"
+ "v4ur:route/v4ur:next-hop/v4ur:next-hop-options/"
+ "v4ur:simple-next-hop"
{
description
"Augment 'simple-next-hop' case in IPv4 unicast route.";
leaf preference {
type uint32;
default "1";
description
"The preference is used to select among multiple static
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
routes. Routes with a lower preference next-hop are
preferred and equal preference routes result in
Equal-Cost-Multi-Path (ECMP) static routes.";
}
leaf tag {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"The tag is a 32-bit opaque value associated with the
route that can be used for policy decisions such as
advertisement and filtering of the route.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rt:static-routes/v4ur:ipv4/"
+ "v4ur:route/v4ur:next-hop/v4ur:next-hop-options/"
+ "v4ur:next-hop-list/v4ur:next-hop-list/v4ur:next-hop"
{
description
"Augment static route configuration 'next-hop-list'.";
leaf preference {
type uint32;
default "1";
description
"The preference is used to select among multiple static
routes. Routes with a lower preference next-hop are
preferred and equal preference routes result in
Equal-Cost-Multi-Path (ECMP) static routes.";
}
leaf tag {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"The tag is a 32-bit opaque value associated with the
route that can be used for policy decisions such as
advertisement and filtering of the route.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rt:static-routes/v6ur:ipv6/"
+ "v6ur:route/v6ur:next-hop/v6ur:next-hop-options/"
+ "v6ur:simple-next-hop"
{
description
"Augment 'simple-next-hop' case in IPv6 unicast route.";
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
leaf preference {
type uint32;
default "1";
description
"The preference is used to select among multiple static
routes. Routes with a lower preference next-hop are
preferred and equal preference routes result in
Equal-Cost-Multi-Path (ECMP) static routes.";
}
leaf tag {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"The tag is a 32-bit opaque value associated with the
route that can be used for policy decisions such as
advertisement and filtering of the route.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols/"
+ "rt:control-plane-protocol/rt:static-routes/v6ur:ipv6/"
+ "v6ur:route/v6ur:next-hop/v6ur:next-hop-options/"
+ "v6ur:next-hop-list/v6ur:next-hop-list/v6ur:next-hop"
{
description
"Augment static route configuration 'next-hop-list'.";
leaf preference {
type uint32;
default "1";
description
"The preference is used to select among multiple static
routes. Routes with a lower preference next-hop are
preferred and equal preference routes result in
Equal-Cost-Multi-Path (ECMP) static routes.";
}
leaf tag {
type uint32;
default "0";
description
"The tag is a 32-bit opaque value associated with the
route that can be used for policy decisions such as
advertisement and filtering of the route.";
}
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:ribs/rt:rib"
{
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
description
"Augment a RIB with statistics.";
uses rib-statistics;
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:ribs/rt:rib/"
+ "rt:routes/rt:route"
{
description
"Augment a route in RIB with attributes.";
uses attributes;
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:ribs/rt:rib/"
+ "rt:routes/rt:route/rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/"
+ "rt:simple-next-hop"
{
description
"Augment simple-next-hop with repair-path.";
uses repair-path;
}
augment "/rt:routing/rt:ribs/rt:rib/"
+ "rt:routes/rt:route/rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/"
+ "rt:next-hop-list/rt:next-hop-list/rt:next-hop"
{
description
"Augment the multiple next hops with repair path.";
uses repair-path;
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
6. Security Considerations
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
[RFC8446].
The NETCONF access control model [RFC8341] provides the means to
restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a pre-
configured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol
operations and content.
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
There are a number of data nodes defined in ietf-rib-extensions.yang
module that are writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true,
which is the default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive
or vulnerable in some network environments. Write operations (e.g.,
edit-config) to these data nodes without proper protection can have a
negative effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and
data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
/v4ur:next-hop-options/v4ur:simple-next-hop/rib-ext:preference
/v4ur:next-hop-options/v4ur:simple-next-hop/rib-ext:tag
/v4ur:next-hop-options/v4ur:next-hop-list/v4ur:next-hop-list
/v4ur:next-hop/rib-ext:preference
/v4ur:next-hop-options/v4ur:next-hop-list/v4ur:next-hop-list
/v4ur:next-hop/rib-ext:tag
/v6ur:next-hop-options/v6ur:simple-next-hop/rib-ext:preference
/v6ur:next-hop-options/v6ur:simple-next-hop/rib-ext:tag
/v6ur:next-hop-options/v6ur:next-hop-list/v6ur:next-hop-list
/v6ur:next-hop/rib-ext:preference
/v6ur:next-hop-options/v6ur:next-hop-list/v6ur:next-hop-list
/v6ur:next-hop/rib-ext:tag
For these augmentations to ietf-routing.yang, the ability to
delete, add, and modify IPv4 and IPv6 static route preference and
tag would allow traffic to be misrouted.
Some of the readable data nodes in the ietf-rib-extensions.yang
module may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network
environments. It is thus important to control read access (e.g., via
get, get-config, or notification) to these data nodes. These are the
subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
/rt:routing/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rib-ext:statistics
/rt:routing/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:routes/rt:route/rib-ext:metric
/rt:routing/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:routes/rt:route/rib-ext:tag
/rt:routing/rt:ribs/rt:rib/rt:routes/rt:route /rib-
ext:application-tag
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
/rt:route/rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options/rt:simple-next-hop /rib-
ext:repair-path
/rt:routes/rt:route/rt:next-hop/rt:next-hop-options /rt:next-hop-
list/rt:next-hop-list/rt:next-hop/rib-ext:repair-path
The exposure of the Routing Information Base (RIB) will expose the
routing topology of the network. This may be undesirable since
both due to the fact that exposure may facilitate other attacks.
Additionally, network operators may consider their topologies to
be sensitive confidential data.
All the security considerations for [RFC8349] writable and readable
data nodes apply to the augmentations described herein.
7. IANA Considerations
This document registers a URI in the IETF XML registry [RFC3688].
Following the format in [RFC3688], the following registration is
requested to be made:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-rib-extension
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace.
This document registers a YANG module in the YANG Module Names
registry [RFC6020].
name: ietf-rib-extension
namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-rib-extension
prefix: rib-ext
reference: RFC XXXX
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
[RFC8342] Bjorklund, M., Schoenwaelder, J., Shafer, P., Watsen, K.,
and R. Wilton, "Network Management Datastore Architecture
(NMDA)", RFC 8342, DOI 10.17487/RFC8342, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8342>.
[RFC8343] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface
Management", RFC 8343, DOI 10.17487/RFC8343, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8343>.
[RFC8349] Lhotka, L., Lindem, A., and Y. Qu, "A YANG Data Model for
Routing Management (NMDA Version)", RFC 8349,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8349, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8349>.
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
8.2. Informative References
[RFC5714] Shand, M. and S. Bryant, "IP Fast Reroute Framework",
RFC 5714, DOI 10.17487/RFC5714, January 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5714>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
Appendix A. Combined Tree Diagram
This appendix includes the combined ietf-routing.yang, ietf-ipv4-
unicast-routing.yang, ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing.yang and ietf-rib-
extensions.yang tree diagram.
module: ietf-routing
+--rw routing
+--rw router-id? yang:dotted-quad {router-id}?
+--ro interfaces
| +--ro interface* if:interface-ref
+--rw control-plane-protocols
| +--rw control-plane-protocol* [type name]
| +--rw type identityref
| +--rw name string
| +--rw description? string
| +--rw static-routes
| +--rw v4ur:ipv4
| | +--rw v4ur:route* [destination-prefix]
| | +--rw v4ur:destination-prefix inet:ipv4-prefix
| | +--rw v4ur:description? string
| | +--rw v4ur:next-hop
| | +--rw (v4ur:next-hop-options)
| | +--:(v4ur:simple-next-hop)
| | | +--rw v4ur:outgoing-interface?
| | | | if:interface-ref
| | | +--rw v4ur:next-hop-address?
| | | | inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--rw rib-ext:preference? uint32
| | | +--rw rib-ext:tag? uint32
| | +--:(v4ur:special-next-hop)
| | | +--rw v4ur:special-next-hop? enumeration
| | +--:(v4ur:next-hop-list)
| | +--rw v4ur:next-hop-list
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
| | +--rw v4ur:next-hop* [index]
| | +--rw v4ur:index string
| | +--rw v4ur:outgoing-interface?
| | | if:interface-ref
| | +--rw v4ur:next-hop-address?
| | | inet:ipv4-address
| | +--rw rib-ext:preference? uint32
| | +--rw rib-ext:tag? uint32
| +--rw v6ur:ipv6
| +--rw v6ur:route* [destination-prefix]
| +--rw v6ur:destination-prefix inet:ipv6-prefix
| +--rw v6ur:description? string
| +--rw v6ur:next-hop
| +--rw (v6ur:next-hop-options)
| +--:(v6ur:simple-next-hop)
| | +--rw v6ur:outgoing-interface?
| | | if:interface-ref
| | +--rw v6ur:next-hop-address?
| | | inet:ipv6-address
| | +--rw rib-ext:preference? uint32
| | +--rw rib-ext:tag? uint32
| +--:(v6ur:special-next-hop)
| | +--rw v6ur:special-next-hop? enumeration
| +--:(v6ur:next-hop-list)
| +--rw v6ur:next-hop-list
| +--rw v6ur:next-hop* [index]
| +--rw v6ur:index string
| +--rw v6ur:outgoing-interface?
| | if:interface-ref
| +--rw v6ur:next-hop-address?
| | inet:ipv6-address
| +--rw rib-ext:preference? uint32
| +--rw rib-ext:tag? uint32
+--rw ribs
+--rw rib* [name]
+--rw name string
+--rw address-family identityref
+--ro default-rib? boolean {multiple-ribs}?
+--ro routes
| +--ro route* []
| +--ro route-preference? route-preference
| +--ro next-hop
| | +--ro (next-hop-options)
| | +--:(simple-next-hop)
| | | +--ro outgoing-interface? if:interface-ref
| | | +--ro v4ur:next-hop-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--ro v6ur:next-hop-address? inet:ipv6-address
| | | +--ro rib-ext:repair-path
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
| | | +--ro rib-ext:outgoing-interface?
| | | | if:interface-state-ref
| | | +--ro rib-ext:next-hop-address?
| | | | inet:ip-address
| | | +--ro rib-ext:metric? uint32
| | +--:(special-next-hop)
| | | +--ro special-next-hop? enumeration
| | +--:(next-hop-list)
| | +--ro next-hop-list
| | +--ro next-hop* []
| | +--ro outgoing-interface?
| | | if:interface-ref
| | +--ro v4ur:address?
| | | inet:ipv4-address
| | +--ro v6ur:address?
| | | inet:ipv6-address
| | +--ro rib-ext:repair-path
| | +--ro rib-ext:outgoing-interface?
| | | if:interface-state-ref
| | +--ro rib-ext:next-hop-address?
| | | inet:ip-address
| | +--ro rib-ext:metric? uint32
| +--ro source-protocol identityref
| +--ro active? empty
| +--ro last-updated? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro v4ur:destination-prefix? inet:ipv4-prefix
| +--ro v6ur:destination-prefix? inet:ipv6-prefix
| +--ro rib-ext:metric? uint32
| +--ro rib-ext:tag* uint32
| +--ro rib-ext:application-tag? uint32
+---x active-route
| +---w input
| | +---w v4ur:destination-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | +---w v6ur:destination-address? inet:ipv6-address
| +--ro output
| +--ro route
| +--ro next-hop
| | +--ro (next-hop-options)
| | +--:(simple-next-hop)
| | | +--ro outgoing-interface? if:interface-ref
| | | +--ro v4ur:next-hop-address? inet:ipv4-address
| | | +--ro v6ur:next-hop-address? inet:ipv6-address
| | +--:(special-next-hop)
| | | +--ro special-next-hop? enumeration
| | +--:(next-hop-list)
| | +--ro next-hop-list
| | +--ro next-hop* []
| | +--ro outgoing-interface?
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
| | | if:interface-ref
| | +--ro v4ur:next-hop-address?
| | | inet:ipv4-address
| | +--ro v6ur:next-hop-address?
| | | inet:ipv6-address
| +--ro source-protocol identityref
| +--ro active? empty
| +--ro last-updated? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro v4ur:destination-prefix? inet:ipv4-prefix
| +--ro v6ur:destination-prefix? inet:ipv6-prefix
+--rw description? string
+--ro rib-ext:statistics
+--ro rib-ext:total-routes? uint32
+--ro rib-ext:total-active-routes? uint32
+--ro rib-ext:total-route-memory? uint64
+--ro rib-ext:protocol-statistics* []
+--ro rib-ext:protocol? identityref
+--ro rib-ext:routes? uint32
+--ro rib-ext:active-routes? uint32
+--ro rib-ext:route-memory? uint64
Appendix B. ietf-rib-extension.yang example
The following is an XML example using the RIB extension module and
RFC 8349.
<routing xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-routing">
<control-plane-protocols>
<control-plane-protocol>
<type>static</type>
<name>static-routing-protocol</name>
<static-routes>
<ipv4 xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing">
<route>
<destination-prefix>0.0.0.0/0</destination-prefix>
<next-hop>
<next-hop-address>192.0.2.2</next-hop-address>
<preference xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-rib-extension">30</preference>
<tag xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-rib-extension">99</tag>
</next-hop>
</route>
</ipv4>
<ipv6 xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing">
<route>
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
<destination-prefix>::/0</destination-prefix>
<next-hop>
<next-hop-address>2001:db8:aaaa::1111</next-hop-address>
<preference xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-rib-extension">30</preference>
<tag xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-rib-extension">66</tag>
</next-hop>
</route>
</ipv6>
</static-routes>
</control-plane-protocol>
</control-plane-protocols>
<ribs>
<rib>
<name>ipv4-master</name>
<address-family xmlns:v4ur="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing">v4ur:ipv4-unicast</address-family>
<default-rib>true</default-rib>
<routes>
<route>
<destination-prefix xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing">0.0.0.0/0</destination-prefix>
<next-hop>
<next-hop-address xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing">192.0.2.2</next-hop-address>
</next-hop>
<route-preference>5</route-preference>
<source-protocol>static</source-protocol>
<last-updated>2015-10-24T18:02:45+02:00</last-updated>
</route>
<route>
<destination-prefix xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing">198.51.100.0/24\
</destination-prefix>
<next-hop>
<next-hop-address xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing">192.0.2.2</next-hop-address>
<repair-path xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-rib-extension">
<next-hop-address>203.0.113.1</next-hop-address>
<metric>200</metric>
</repair-path>
</next-hop>
<route-preference>110</route-preference>
<source-protocol xmlns:ospf="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ospf">ospf:ospf</source-protocol>
<last-updated>2015-10-24T18:02:45+02:00</last-updated>
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 21]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
</route>
</routes>
</rib>
<rib>
<name>ipv6-master</name>
<address-family xmlns:v6ur="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing">v6ur:ipv6-unicast</address-family>
<default-rib>true</default-rib>
<routes>
<route>
<destination-prefix xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing">0::/0</destination-prefix>
<next-hop>
<next-hop-address xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing">2001:db8:aaaa::1111\
</next-hop-address>
</next-hop>
<route-preference>5</route-preference>
<source-protocol>static</source-protocol>
<last-updated>2015-10-24T18:02:45+02:00</last-updated>
</route>
<route>
<destination-prefix xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing">2001:db8:bbbb::/64\
</destination-prefix>
<next-hop>
<next-hop-address xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing">2001:db8:aaaa::1111\
</next-hop-address>
<repair-path xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-rib-extension">
<next-hop-address>2001:db8:cccc::2222</next-hop-address>
<metric>200</metric>
</repair-path>
</next-hop>
<route-preference>110</route-preference>
<source-protocol xmlns:ospf="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:\
ietf-ospf">ospf:ospf</source-protocol>
<last-updated>2015-10-24T18:02:45+02:00</last-updated>
</route>
</routes>
</rib>
</ribs>
</routing>
The following is the same example using JSON format.
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 22]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
{
"ietf-routing:routing": {
"control-plane-protocols": {
"control-plane-protocol": [
{
"type": "static",
"name": "static-routing-protocol",
"static-routes": {
"ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing:ipv4": {
"route": [
{
"destination-prefix": "0.0.0.0/0",
"next-hop": {
"next-hop-address": "192.0.2.2",
"ietf-rib-extension:preference": 30,
"ietf-rib-extension:tag": 99
}
}
]
},
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:ipv6": {
"route": [
{
"destination-prefix": "::/0",
"next-hop": {
"next-hop-address": "2001:db8:aaaa::1111",
"ietf-rib-extension:preference": 30,
"ietf-rib-extension:tag": 66
}
}
]
}
}
}
]
},
"ribs": {
"rib": [
{
"name": "ipv4-master",
"address-family": "ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing:ipv4-unicast",
"default-rib": true,
"routes": {
"route": [
{
"next-hop": {
"ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing:next-hop-address": \
"192.0.2.2"
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 23]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
},
"route-preference": 5,
"source-protocol": "static",
"last-updated": "2015-10-24T18:02:45+02:00",
"ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing:destination-prefix": \
"0.0.0.0/0"
},
{
"next-hop": {
"ietf-rib-extension:repair-path": {
"next-hop-address": "203.0.113.1",
"metric": 200
},
"ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing:next-hop-address": \
"192.0.2.2"
},
"route-preference": 110,
"source-protocol": "ietf-ospf:ospf",
"last-updated": "2015-10-24T18:02:45+02:00",
"ietf-ipv4-unicast-routing:destination-prefix": \
"198.51.100.0/24"
}
]
}
},
{
"name": "ipv6-master",
"address-family": "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:ipv6-unicast",
"default-rib": true,
"routes": {
"route": [
{
"next-hop": {
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:next-hop-address": \
"2001:db8:aaaa::1111"
},
"route-preference": 5,
"source-protocol": "static",
"last-updated": "2015-10-24T18:02:45+02:00",
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:destination-prefix": "::/0"
},
{
"next-hop": {
"ietf-rib-extension:repair-path": {
"next-hop-address": "2001:db8:cccc::2222",
"metric": 200
},
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:next-hop-address": \
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 24]
Internet-Draft YANG RIB-EXT May 2022
"2001:db8:aaaa::1111"
},
"route-preference": 110,
"source-protocol": "ietf-ospf:ospf",
"last-updated": "2015-10-24T18:02:45+02:00",
"ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing:destination-prefix": \
"2001:db8:bbbb::/64"
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
}
Appendix C. Acknowledgments
The RFC text was produced using Marshall Rose's xml2rfc tool.
The authors wish to thank Les Ginsberg, Krishna Deevi, and Suyoung
Yoon for their helpful comments and suggestions.
The authors wish to thank Tom Petch, Rob Wilton and Chris Hopps for
their reviews and comments.
Authors' Addresses
Acee Lindem
Cisco Systems
301 Midenhall Way
Cary, NC 27513
United States of America
Email: acee@cisco.com
Yingzhen Qu
Futurewei
2330 Central Expressway
Santa Clara, CA 95050
United States of America
Email: yingzhen.qu@futurewei.com
Lindem & Qu Expires 10 November 2022 [Page 25]