%% You should probably cite rfc8205 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-23,
    number =    {draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-23},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol/23/},
    author =    {Matt Lepinski and Kotikalapudi Sriram},
    title =     {{BGPsec Protocol Specification}},
    pagetotal = 45,
    year =      2017,
    month =     apr,
    day =       27,
    abstract =  {This document describes BGPsec, an extension to the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) that provides security for the path of Autonomous Systems (ASes) through which a BGP UPDATE message passes. BGPsec is implemented via an optional non-transitive BGP path attribute that carries digital signatures produced by each AS that propagates the UPDATE message. The digital signatures provide confidence that every AS on the path of ASes listed in the UPDATE message has explicitly authorized the advertisement of the route.},
}