The Profile for Algorithms and Key Sizes for Use in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure
draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05
Yes
(Alvaro Retana)
No Objection
(Alexey Melnikov)
(Alia Atlas)
(Alissa Cooper)
(Barry Leiba)
(Ben Campbell)
(Benoît Claise)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Mirja Kühlewind)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Suresh Krishnan)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -04)
Unknown
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Alissa Cooper Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-11-18 for -04)
Unknown
I support Terry's DISCUSS.
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Kathleen Moriarty Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2015-11-17 for -04)
Unknown
The SecDir reviewer picked up on a stray "/>" in section 6, just making a note of that here, but I'm sure the RFC editor would see it too. https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06151.html
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Mirja Kühlewind Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -04)
Unknown
Suresh Krishnan Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-06-14)
Unknown
Thank you for amending the text in Section 5 (Additional Requirements) to reflect the work in RFC6916 and removing the explicit contradiction. Setting my ballot to No Objection.