RPKI Validation Reconsidered
draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-01
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft that was ultimately published as RFC 8360.
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Geoff Huston , George G. Michaelson , Carlos M. Martínez , Tim Bruijnzeels , Andy Newton , Alain Aina | ||
| Last updated | 2015-07-28 (Latest revision 2015-01-24) | ||
| RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Reviews | |||
| Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
| Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
| Document shepherd | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document reviews the certificate validation procedure specified in RFC6487 and highlights aspects of operational fragility in the management of certificates in the RPKI in response to the movement of resources across registries, and the associated actions of Certification Authorities to maintain continuity of validation of certification of resources during this movement.
Authors
Geoff Huston
George G. Michaelson
Carlos M. Martínez
Tim Bruijnzeels
Andy Newton
Alain Aina
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)