%% You should probably cite rfc9455 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-sidrops-roa-considerations-02,
    number =    {draft-ietf-sidrops-roa-considerations-02},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidrops-roa-considerations/02/},
    author =    {Zhiwei Yan and Randy Bush and Guanggang Geng and Jiankang Yao},
    title =     {{Avoidance for ROA Containing Multiple IP Prefixes}},
    pagetotal = 7,
    year =      2022,
    month =     apr,
    day =       29,
    abstract =  {In RPKI, the address space holder needs to issue an ROA object when authorizing one or more ASes to originate routes to IP prefix(es). During ROA issurance process, the address space holder may need to specify an origin AS for a list of IP prefixes. Additionally, the address space holder is free to choose to put multiple prefixes into a single ROA or issue separate ROAs for each prefix according to the current specification. This memo analyzes some operational problems which may arise from ROAs containing multiple IP prefixes and recommends avoiding placing multiple IP prefixes in one ROA.},
}