%% You should probably cite rfc9324 instead of this I-D.
@techreport{ietf-sidrops-rov-no-rr-03,
    number =    {draft-ietf-sidrops-rov-no-rr-03},
    type =      {Internet-Draft},
    institution =   {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    publisher = {Internet Engineering Task Force},
    note =      {Work in Progress},
    url =       {https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidrops-rov-no-rr/03/},
    author =    {Randy Bush and Keyur Patel and Dr. Philip F. Smith and Mark Tinka},
    title =     {{RPKI-Based Policy Without Route Refresh}},
    pagetotal = 7,
    year =      2022,
    month =     jul,
    day =       6,
    abstract =  {A BGP Speaker performing RPKI-based policy should not issue Route Refresh to its neighbors because it has received new RPKI data. This document updates RFC8481 by describing how to avoid doing so by either keeping a full Adj-RIB-In or saving paths dropped due to ROV so they may be reevaluated with respect to new RPKI data.},
}