A profile for Signed Prefix Lists for Use in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-prefixlist-01
The information below is for an old version of the document.
Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Active".
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Authors | Job Snijders , Geoff Huston | ||
Last updated | 2024-01-24 (Latest revision 2023-10-17) | ||
Replaces | draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-prefixlist | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | WG Document | |
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-prefixlist-01
sidrops J. Snijders Internet-Draft Fastly Intended status: Standards Track G. Huston Expires: 27 July 2024 APNIC 24 January 2024 A profile for Signed Prefix Lists for Use in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-prefixlist-01 Abstract This document defines a "Signed Prefix List", a Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) protected content type for use with the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) to carry the complete list of prefixes which an Autonomous System (AS) may originate to all or any of its routing peers. The validation of a Signed Prefix List confirms that the holder of the listed ASN produced the object, and that this list is a current, accurate and complete description of address prefixes that may be announced into the routing system originated by this AS. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 27 July 2024. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights Snijders & Huston Expires 27 July 2024 [Page 1] Internet-Draft RPKI Signed Prefix List January 2024 and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. The Signed Prefix List ContentType . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. The Signed Prefix List eContent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.1. Version . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2. asID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.3. prefixes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.3.1. Element AddressFamilyAddressPrefixes . . . . . . . . 5 4. Signed Prefix List Validation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 5. Operational Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5.1. EE Certificates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 5.2. Object Filenames . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7.1. SMI Security for S/MIME CMS Content Type (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7.2. RPKI Signed Objects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7.3. RPKI Repository Name Schemes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 7.4. SMI Security for S/MIME Module Identifier (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.0) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 7.5. Media Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 7.5.1. Signed Prefix List Media Type . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 8.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Appendix A. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Appendix B. Example payloads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 B.1. Example Signed Prefix List eContent Payload . . . . . . . 11 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 1. Introduction This document defines a "Signed Prefix List", a Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) [RFC5652] [RFC6268] protected content type to carry a list of IP address prefixes and an Autonomous System Number. The list of prefixes describes the maximal set of prefixes that the Autonomous System MAY announce to any of its routing peers. The content is signed by the holder of the RPKI private key associated with the listed ASN. Snijders & Huston Expires 27 July 2024 [Page 2] Internet-Draft RPKI Signed Prefix List January 2024 RPKI Signed Prefix Lists allow other RPKI-validating remote routing entities to audit the collection of announcements that have the subject ASN as the originating AS. Any prefixes originated by this AS not contained in a validated Signed Prefix List SHOULD be regarded as ineligible, but ultimately their consequent handling by the local routing entity that performed the audit function is a matter of local policy. The intent of this object is to offer a RPKI-based successor to the [RFC2622] 'route-set' class objects used in Internet Routing Registries (IRRs). The semantics of the route-set and the Signed Prefix List are similair. The difference is that the RPKI signature allows a relying party of be assured of the currency and authenticity of the Signed Prefix List as a complete enumeration of all prefixes that may be announced as originating by this AS if the object can be validated by the RPKI. Signed Prefix List objects follow the Signed Object Template for the RPKI [RFC6488]. 1.1. Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. 2. The Signed Prefix List ContentType The eContentType for a Prefix List is defined as id-ct- rpkiSignedPrefixList, with Object Identifier (OID) 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.TBD. This OID MUST appear within both the eContentType in the encapContentInfo object and the ContentType signed attribute in the signerInfo object (see [RFC6488]). 3. The Signed Prefix List eContent The content of a Signed Prefix List is a single ASN and a list of IP address prefixes. An Signed Prefix List is formally defined as follows: Snijders & Huston Expires 27 July 2024 [Page 3] Internet-Draft RPKI Signed Prefix List January 2024 RpkiSignedPrefixList-2024 { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9) smime(16) mod(0) id-mod-rpkiSignedPrefixList-2024(TBD) } DEFINITIONS EXPLICIT TAGS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS CONTENT-TYPE FROM CryptographicMessageSyntax-2010 -- in [RFC6268] { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9) smime(16) modules(0) id-mod-cms-2009(58) } ; ct-rpkiSignedPrefixList CONTENT-TYPE ::= { TYPE RpkiSignedPrefixList IDENTIFIED BY id-ct-rpkiSignedPrefixList } id-ct-rpkiSignedPrefixList OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9) id-smime(16) id-ct(1) TBD } RpkiSignedPrefixList ::= SEQUENCE { version [0] INTEGER (0..MAX) DEFAULT 0, asID INTEGER (1..4294967295), prefixes SEQUENCE (SIZE(0..2)) OF AddressFamilyAddressPrefixes } AddressFamilyAddressPrefixes ::= SEQUENCE { addressFamily ADDRESS-FAMILY.&afi ({AddressFamilySet}), addressPrefixes ADDRESS-FAMILY.&Prefixes ({AddressFamilySet}{@addressFamily}) } ADDRESS-FAMILY ::= CLASS { &afi OCTET STRING (SIZE(2)) UNIQUE, &Prefixes } WITH SYNTAX { AFI &afi PREFIXES &Prefixes } AddressFamilySet ADDRESS-FAMILY ::= { addressFamilyIPv4 | addressFamilyIPv6 } addressFamilyIPv4 ADDRESS-FAMILY ::= { AFI afi-IPv4 PREFIXES IPv4Prefixes } addressFamilyIPv6 ADDRESS-FAMILY ::= { AFI afi-IPv6 PREFIXES IPv6Prefixes } afi-IPv4 OCTET STRING ::= '0001'H afi-IPv6 OCTET STRING ::= '0002'H IPv4Prefixes ::= SEQUENCE (SIZE(1..MAX)) OF AddressPrefix{32} IPv6Prefixes ::= SEQUENCE (SIZE(1..MAX)) OF AddressPrefix{128} AddressPrefix {INTEGER: len} ::= BIT STRING (SIZE(0..len)) Snijders & Huston Expires 27 July 2024 [Page 4] Internet-Draft RPKI Signed Prefix List January 2024 END 3.1. Version The version number of the RpkiSignedPrefixList MUST be 0. 3.2. asID The Autonomous System Number contained here MUST be a contained within the set of AS Identifier resources listed by the EE certificate carried in the CMS certificates field. 3.3. prefixes This field contains a SEQUENCE of AddressFamilyAddressPrefixes. The AddressFamilyAddressPrefixes elements MUST be ordered in ascending order by numeric value of the addressFamily field. 3.3.1. Element AddressFamilyAddressPrefixes This field contains a SEQUENCE which contains one instance of addressFamily and one instance of addressPrefixes. 3.3.1.1. addressFamily This field contains a OCTET STRING which is either '0001'H (IPv4) or '0002'H (IPv6). 3.3.1.2. addressPrefixes This field contains a SEQUENCE of parameterized AddressPrefix instances. The canonicalization procedure specified in Section 4.3.3 of [I-D.ietf-sidrops-rfc6482bis] MUST be applied. 3.3.1.3. Element AddressPrefix This element is length bounded through the Information Object Class ADDRESS-FAMILY. The type is a BIT STRING, see Section 2.2.3.8 of [RFC3779] for more information on encoding IP prefixes. 4. Signed Prefix List Validation To validate a Signed Prefix List, the RP MUST perform all the validation checks specified in [RFC6488]. In addition, the RP MUST perform the following validation steps: 1. The contents of the CMS eContent field MUST conform to all of the constraints described in Section 3. Snijders & Huston Expires 27 July 2024 [Page 5] Internet-Draft RPKI Signed Prefix List January 2024 2. The Autonomous System Identifier Delegation extension [RFC3779] MUST be present in the EE certificate contained in the CMS certificates field. 3. The AS identifier present in the RpkiSignedPrefixList eContent 'asID' field MUST be a subset of the AS Indentifiers present in the certificate extension. 4. The Autonomous System Identifier Delegation extension MUST NOT contain "inherit" elements. 5. The IP Address Delegation Extension [RFC3779] is not used in Signed Prefix List, and MUST NOT be present in the EE certificate. 5. Operational Considerations Multiple valid Signed Prefix List objects which contain the same asID could exist. In such cases the union of address prefix members forms the complete set of members. It is highly RECOMMENDED that a compliant CA maintains a single Signed Prefix List for a given asID. If an AS holder publishes a Signed Prefix List, then relying parties SHOULD assume that the list is complete for that originating AS, and the presence of any route with the same AS as the originating AS and an address prefix that is not included in the Signed Prefix List implies that the route has been propagated within the routing system without the permission of the originating AS. The construction of an 'allowlist' for a given EBGP session using Signed Prefix List(s) compliments both best current practises [RFC7454] and the practise of rejecting RPKI-ROV-invalid BGP route announcements [RFC6811]. In other words, if a given BGP route is covered by a Signed Prefix List, but also is "invalid" from a Route Origin Validation perspective, it is RECOMMENDED to reject the route announcement. 5.1. EE Certificates The Certificate Authority (CA) SHOULD sign only one Signed Prefix List with each generated private key and SHOULD generate a new key pair for each new version of a Signed Prefix List object. The CA MUST generate a new End Entity (EE) certificate for each signing of a particular Signed Prefix List. An associated EE certificate used in this fashion is termed a "one-time-use" EE certificate (see Section 3 of [RFC6487]). Snijders & Huston Expires 27 July 2024 [Page 6] Internet-Draft RPKI Signed Prefix List January 2024 5.2. Object Filenames A guideline for naming Signed Prefix List objects is that the file name chosen in the repository be a value derived from the public key of the EE certificate. One such method of generating a publication name is described in Section 2.1 of [RFC4387]; convert the 160-bit hash of a EE's public key value into a 27-character string using a modified form of Base64 encoding, with an additional modification as proposed in Section 5, table 2, of [RFC4648]. 6. Security Considerations Relying Parties are warned that the data in a Signed Prefix List is self-asserted by the AS holder. There is no implied authority from any IP prefix holder that grants the AS permission to originate a route for any prefixes. Such an authority is separately conveyed in the RPKI as a ROA. While a one-time-use EE certificate must only be used to generate and sign a single Signed Prefix List object, CAs are not technically restricted from generating and signing multiple different Signed Prefix List objects with a single key pair. Any Signed Prefix List objects sharing the same EE certificate cannot be revoked individually. 7. IANA Considerations 7.1. SMI Security for S/MIME CMS Content Type (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1) IANA is requested to allocated the following in the "SMI Security for S/MIME CMS Content Type (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1)" registry: +=========+============================+=====================+ | Decimal | Description | References | +=========+============================+=====================+ | TBD | id-ct-rpkiSignedPrefixList | draft-ietf-sidrops- | | | | rpki-prefixlist | +---------+----------------------------+---------------------+ Table 1 7.2. RPKI Signed Objects IANA is requested to register two OIDs in the "RPKI Signed Objects" registry [RFC6488] as follows: Snijders & Huston Expires 27 July 2024 [Page 7] Internet-Draft RPKI Signed Prefix List January 2024 +=============+=============================+=====================+ | Name | OID | Reference | +=============+=============================+=====================+ | Signed | 1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.1.TBD | draft-ietf-sidrops- | | Prefix List | | rpki-prefixlist | +-------------+-----------------------------+---------------------+ Table 2 7.3. RPKI Repository Name Schemes IANA is requested to add the Signed Prefix List file extension to the "RPKI Repository Name Schemes" registry [RFC6481] as follows: +===========+=============+====================================+ | Filename | RPKI Object | Reference | | Extension | | | +===========+=============+====================================+ | .spl | Signed | draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-prefixlist | | | Prefix List | | +-----------+-------------+------------------------------------+ Table 3 7.4. SMI Security for S/MIME Module Identifier (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.0) IANA is requested to allocate the following in the "SMI Security for S/MIME Module Identifier (1.2.840.113549.1.9.16.0)" registry: +=========+==================================+=====================+ | Decimal | Description | References | +=========+==================================+=====================+ | TBD | id-mod-rpkiSignedPrefixList-2024 | draft-ietf-sidrops- | | | | rpki-prefixlist | +---------+----------------------------------+---------------------+ Table 4 7.5. Media Types IANA is requested to register the media type "application/rpki- prefixlist" in the "Media Types" registry as follows: 7.5.1. Signed Prefix List Media Type Type name: application Subtype name: rpki-prefixlist Snijders & Huston Expires 27 July 2024 [Page 8] Internet-Draft RPKI Signed Prefix List January 2024 Required parameters: N/A Optional parameters: N/A Encoding considerations: binary Security considerations: Carries a Signed Prefix List. This media type contains no active content. See Section 4 of draft-ietf- sidrops-rpki-prefixlist for further information. Interoperability considerations: N/A Published specification: draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-prefixlist Applications that use this media type: RPKI operators Fragment identifier considerations: N/A Additional information: Content: This media type is a signed object, as defined in [RFC6488], which contains a list of prefixes as defined in draft-ietf-sidrops-rpki-prefixlist. Magic number(s): N/A File extension(s): .spl Macintosh file type code(s): N/A Person & email address to contact for further information: Job Snijders (job@fastly.com) Intended usage: COMMON Restrictions on usage: N/A Author: Job Snijders (job@fastly.com) Change controller: IETF 8. References 8.1. Normative References [I-D.ietf-sidrops-rfc6482bis] Snijders, J., Maddison, B., Lepinski, M., Kong, D., and S. Kent, "A Profile for Route Origin Authorizations (ROAs)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-sidrops- rfc6482bis-09, 14 December 2023, <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sidrops- rfc6482bis-09>. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>. [RFC2622] Alaettinoglu, C., Villamizar, C., Gerich, E., Kessens, D., Meyer, D., Bates, T., Karrenberg, D., and M. Terpstra, "Routing Policy Specification Language (RPSL)", RFC 2622, DOI 10.17487/RFC2622, June 1999, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2622>. Snijders & Huston Expires 27 July 2024 [Page 9] Internet-Draft RPKI Signed Prefix List January 2024 [RFC3779] Lynn, C., Kent, S., and K. Seo, "X.509 Extensions for IP Addresses and AS Identifiers", RFC 3779, DOI 10.17487/RFC3779, June 2004, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3779>. [RFC5652] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", STD 70, RFC 5652, DOI 10.17487/RFC5652, September 2009, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5652>. [RFC6481] Huston, G., Loomans, R., and G. Michaelson, "A Profile for Resource Certificate Repository Structure", RFC 6481, DOI 10.17487/RFC6481, February 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6481>. [RFC6487] Huston, G., Michaelson, G., and R. Loomans, "A Profile for X.509 PKIX Resource Certificates", RFC 6487, DOI 10.17487/RFC6487, February 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6487>. [RFC6488] Lepinski, M., Chi, A., and S. Kent, "Signed Object Template for the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)", RFC 6488, DOI 10.17487/RFC6488, February 2012, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6488>. [RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>. 8.2. Informative References [RFC4387] Gutmann, P., Ed., "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Operational Protocols: Certificate Store Access via HTTP", RFC 4387, DOI 10.17487/RFC4387, February 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4387>. [RFC4648] Josefsson, S., "The Base16, Base32, and Base64 Data Encodings", RFC 4648, DOI 10.17487/RFC4648, October 2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4648>. [RFC6268] Schaad, J. and S. Turner, "Additional New ASN.1 Modules for the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) and the Public Key Infrastructure Using X.509 (PKIX)", RFC 6268, DOI 10.17487/RFC6268, July 2011, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6268>. Snijders & Huston Expires 27 July 2024 [Page 10] Internet-Draft RPKI Signed Prefix List January 2024 [RFC6811] Mohapatra, P., Scudder, J., Ward, D., Bush, R., and R. Austein, "BGP Prefix Origin Validation", RFC 6811, DOI 10.17487/RFC6811, January 2013, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6811>. [RFC7454] Durand, J., Pepelnjak, I., and G. Doering, "BGP Operations and Security", BCP 194, RFC 7454, DOI 10.17487/RFC7454, February 2015, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7454>. Appendix A. Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank Russ Housley for feedback. Appendix B. Example payloads B.1. Example Signed Prefix List eContent Payload Below an example of a DER-encoded Signed Prefix List eContent is provided with annotation following the '#' character. Snijders & Huston Expires 27 July 2024 [Page 11] Internet-Draft RPKI Signed Prefix List January 2024 $ cat << EOF | xxd -r -ps | openssl asn1parse -inform DER -i -dump 3081b102023cca3081aa307304020001306d03040043ddf5030400a5fee1 030506a5feff00030400c093a8030400c22047030400c63a03030401cc02 1e030400d11800030400d11801030400d11803030402d11804030403d118 08030400d11808030400d11809030404d11810030405d11820030406d118 40030407d11880303304020002302d03070120010418144e030700200106 7c208c030700200107fbfd040307002607fae002450307002a0eb2400000 EOF 0:d=0 hl=3 l= 177 cons: SEQUENCE 3:d=1 hl=2 l= 2 prim: INTEGER :3CCA # AS 15562 7:d=1 hl=3 l= 170 cons: SEQUENCE 10:d=2 hl=2 l= 115 cons: SEQUENCE 12:d=3 hl=2 l= 2 prim: OCTET STRING 0000 - 00 01 # AFI IPv4 16:d=3 hl=2 l= 109 cons: SEQUENCE 18:d=4 hl=2 l= 4 prim: BIT STRING 0000 - 00 43 dd f5 # 67.221.245.0/24 24:d=4 hl=2 l= 4 prim: BIT STRING 0000 - 00 a5 fe e1 # 165.254.225.0/24 30:d=4 hl=2 l= 5 prim: BIT STRING 0000 - 06 a5 fe ff # 165.254.255.0/26 0005 - <SPACES/NULS> ... snip ... 127:d=2 hl=2 l= 51 cons: SEQUENCE 129:d=3 hl=2 l= 2 prim: OCTET STRING 0000 - 00 02 # AFI IPv6 133:d=3 hl=2 l= 45 cons: SEQUENCE 135:d=4 hl=2 l= 7 prim: BIT STRING 0000 - 01 20 01 04 18 14 4e # 2001:418:144e::/47 144:d=4 hl=2 l= 7 prim: BIT STRING 0000 - 00 20 01 06 7c 20 8c # 2001:67c:208c::/48 ... snip ... Authors' Addresses Job Snijders Fastly Amsterdam Netherlands Email: job@fastly.com Geoff Huston APNIC 6 Cordelia St South Brisbane QLD 4101 Australia Snijders & Huston Expires 27 July 2024 [Page 12] Internet-Draft RPKI Signed Prefix List January 2024 Email: gih@apnic.net Snijders & Huston Expires 27 July 2024 [Page 13]