Ballot for draft-ietf-sidrops-rrdp-same-origin
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 02 and is now closed.
Well written document
# Internet AD comments for draft-ietf-sidrops-rrdp-same-origin-02 CC @ekline * comment syntax: - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md * "Handling Ballot Positions": - https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ ## Nits ### S4 * "Registies" -> "Registries"
Thank you to Meral Shirazipour for the GENART review. ** Section 5. Editorial. Per "This internet-draft patches ...", this text won't be accurate when the I-D is published as an RFC. I recommend: s/internet-draft patches/document patches/.
Thanks for the well-written document, easy to read and still useful. # Section 3.1 s/The uri attribute/The "uri" attribute/ (cosmetic but I like to see the name of a field/attribute enclosed in double quotes, easier to read/parse). # Section 4 s/At the moment of writing/In July 2024/ (pedantic probably, but let's be accurate, having some references to a research would be plus) # Section 5 s/This internet-draft patches/This document addresses/ Please move the last sentence (about relative URI) into the introduction, it has little to do in the security considerations. Should there be a "SHOULD log" when such a cross-origin referral is observed ?