Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.
Summary: Needs a YES. Needs 10 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
Comment (2007-04-25 for -)
The document would be better if it discussed where support for IDN-encoded
domain names vs. UTF-8 encoded domain names was allowed. However, that can be
fixed with a subsequent "require" extension so I don't consider it a blocking
Comment (2007-10-01 for -)
I doubt the statement about the system not being Turing-complete. It clearly
can do loops with the redirect command and headers can be use for storage by
controlling a few accounts that things get looped through.
The comparison of how Carnegie Mellon found this better than FLAME is probably
best removed from a standards track document.