Skip to main content

Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Authenticated Identity Body (AIB) Format
draft-ietf-sip-authid-body-03

Yes

(Allison Mankin)

No Objection

(Alex Zinin)
(Bill Fenner)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Steven Bellovin)
(Thomas Narten)

Recuse

(Jon Peterson)

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 03 and is now closed.

Allison Mankin Former IESG member
Yes
Yes () Unknown

                            
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2003-12-18) Unknown
No Further objections or comments
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection (2003-12-18) Unknown
Shepherding AD understands problem. I expect to have no problem clearing the DISCUSS when new text arrives.
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ned Freed Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2003-12-12) Unknown
No IPR boilerplate
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2003-12-16) Unknown
Steven Bellovin Former IESG member
(was Discuss) No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection (2003-12-16) Unknown
I found this text a little unclear:

>  Unsigned AIBs MUST NOT be honored by any recipients.

I'd suggest changing it to say that Unsigned AIBs should be treated according
to the rules set out in Section 7 for AIBs that do not validate; if that doesn't make
sense, then some clarifying text that explains what "MUST NOT be honored" will
imply (identity not displayed?  message discarded?)

In this text:

>   Note that this means that the recipients of the
 >  request, even if they are unable to inspect the AIBF, will still be
  > able to see who signed that body (although it will not necessarily be
  > obvious that the body contains an AIB).

Does it really mean "inspect the AIB Format" or "inspect the AIB?"

An example showing multiple AIBs (Section 4.) would be valuable, I believe.
Thomas Narten Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection () Unknown

                            
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
(was Abstain) Recuse
Recuse () Unknown