Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Extension for Event State Publication
draft-ietf-sip-publish-04
Yes
(Jon Peterson)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Allison Mankin)
(Bert Wijnen)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Margaret Cullen)
(Russ Housley)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Ted Hardie)
(Thomas Narten)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
(was Discuss, Yes)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-04-14)
Unknown
Reviewed by John Loughney, Gen-ART
Margaret Cullen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Steven Bellovin Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Record, Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-04-15)
Unknown
Tables 2 and 3 would be clearer if the document reproduced the key from p. 160 of RFC 3261. I'm extremely confused by this document, since I don't understand what's being published. Or rather, I do understand one thing that can be published -- CPIM presence announcements, since that's what's in the example -- but what else can be published? In what format? Is this CPIM-specific? If not, how can an ESC function if it has to "composit" (not my idea of a verb!) arbitrarily different things. There are unexpanded acronyms (UAC, UAS, PUA)
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Thomas Narten Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown