Communications Resource Priority for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-10
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-22
|
10 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ted Hardie |
2006-03-01
|
10 | (System) | This was part of a ballot set with: draft-ietf-sipping-reason-header-for-preemption |
2005-10-12
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2005-10-03
|
10 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2005-10-03
|
10 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2005-10-03
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2005-09-30
|
10 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-09-29 |
2005-09-29
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
2005-09-29
|
10 | Allison Mankin | Note field has been cleared by Allison Mankin |
2005-09-29
|
10 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ted Hardie |
2005-09-29
|
10 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley |
2005-09-29
|
10 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Bert Wijnen |
2005-09-29
|
10 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot comment] doc: draft-ietf-sipping-reason-header-for-preemption-04.txt !! Missing citation for Normative reference: P018 L028: [2] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., doc: draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-10.txt … [Ballot comment] doc: draft-ietf-sipping-reason-header-for-preemption-04.txt !! Missing citation for Normative reference: P018 L028: [2] Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston, A., doc: draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-10.txt !! Missing citation for Informative reference: P034 L015: [RFC3324] Watson, M., "Short Term Requirements for Network Asserted Mmmm... 14.1 Normative References [I-D.ietf-sipping-reason-header-for-preemption] Polk, J., "Extending the Session Initiation Protocol Reason Header for Preemption Events", draft-ietf-sipping-reason-header-for-preemption-02 (work in progress), August 2004. While rev 04 is on this ballot. Oh well. |
2005-09-29
|
10 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
2005-09-29
|
10 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
2005-09-29
|
10 | Alex Zinin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin |
2005-09-29
|
10 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2005-09-28
|
10 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
2005-09-28
|
10 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Comments: Upon approval of this document the IANA will register/create the following: 2 SIP headers ('Resource-Priority' and 'Accept-Resource-Priority') 1 SIP OPTION tag ('resource-priority') 1 … IANA Comments: Upon approval of this document the IANA will register/create the following: 2 SIP headers ('Resource-Priority' and 'Accept-Resource-Priority') 1 SIP OPTION tag ('resource-priority') 1 4xx error code (response code 417 - Unknown Resource-Priority) 1 new registry for Resource-Priority namespaces (5 initial registrations) 1 new registry for Resource-Priority and priority-values (5 initial registrations) |
2005-09-28
|
10 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
2005-09-28
|
10 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman |
2005-09-27
|
10 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2005-09-26
|
10 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] Section 9 of draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-10 says: > > There should not be a unique namespace for different jurisdictions. > This will … [Ballot comment] Section 9 of draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-10 says: > > There should not be a unique namespace for different jurisdictions. > This will greatly increase interoperability and reduce development > time, and probably reduce future confusion if there is ever a need > to map one namespace to another in an interworking function. > I find this wording misleading. I propose: > > There should be a single namespace for all jurisdictions. This will > greatly increase interoperability and reduce development time, and > probably reduce future confusion if there is ever a need to map one > namespace to another in an interworking function. Please correct the typo in section 11.4 of draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-10: > > The authentication may be based on capabilities and noms, ... Please ensure that "S/MIME" is not split across line breaks. |
2005-09-26
|
10 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] Section 9 of draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-10 says: > > There should not be a unique namespace for different jurisdictions. > This will … [Ballot comment] Section 9 of draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-10 says: > > There should not be a unique namespace for different jurisdictions. > This will greatly increase interoperability and reduce development > time, and probably reduce future confusion if there is ever a need > to map one namespace to another in an interworking function. > I find this wording misleading. I propose: > > There should be a single namespace for all jurisdictions. This will > greatly increase interoperability and reduce development time, and > probably reduce future confusion if there is ever a need to map one > namespace to another in an interworking function. Please correct the type in section 11.4 of draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-10: > > The authentication may be based on capabilities and noms, ... Please ensure that "S/MIME" is not split across line breaks. |
2005-09-26
|
10 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
2005-09-26
|
10 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot discuss] In Section 4.2, draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-10.txt says: 1. If the RP actor recognizes none of the name spaces, treat the request … [Ballot discuss] In Section 4.2, draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-10.txt says: 1. If the RP actor recognizes none of the name spaces, treat the request as if it had no 'Resource-Priority' header field. 2. Ascertain that the request is authorized according to local policy to use the priority levels indicated. If the request is not authorized, reject it. Examples of authorization policies are discussed in Security Considerations (Section 11). I'm wondering about the decision to reject, rather than treat as if no "Resource-Priority" header field was present. Reading through the Security considerations section, the case where there are multiple namespaces asserted seems to create some odd corner cases. An originating RP, for example, might assert priority as foo.1, bar.1. If it traverses a proxy that understands neither, it goes forward as normal priority. If it traverses a proxy that understands foo.1 (but not bar.1), it goes forward with foo.1 priority if it shows as authorized, but is rejected if the proxy shows it unauthorized (even if it would be authorized for bar.1). If the originating RP asserted only bar.1 and bad actor inserted foo.1, this is particularly a problem. That would be mitigated if the error code indicated which Namespace was checked to cause the rejection, but I did not see how that would work in the draft (it seemed, in particular, that you might end up getting back codes that are only valid for namespaces the RP did not understand). |
2005-09-26
|
10 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
2005-09-26
|
10 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter |
2005-09-26
|
10 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin |
2005-09-26
|
10 | Allison Mankin | Ballot has been issued by Allison Mankin |
2005-09-26
|
10 | Allison Mankin | Created "Approve" ballot |
2005-09-22
|
10 | Allison Mankin | [Note]: 'These docs were much reviewed (by Chairs, WG and me) on architecture and details, in WG. The reason-header update submitted for publication a long … [Note]: 'These docs were much reviewed (by Chairs, WG and me) on architecture and details, in WG. The reason-header update submitted for publication a long time before its companion, but waited, and then had updates for it.' added by Allison Mankin |
2005-09-22
|
10 | Allison Mankin | [Note]: 'These documents were much reviewed (by Chairs, WG and me) on architecture and details, in WG. The reason-header update submitted for publication a long … [Note]: 'These documents were much reviewed (by Chairs, WG and me) on architecture and details, in WG. The reason-header update submitted for publication a long time before its companion, but waited, and then had updates for it.' added by Allison Mankin |
2005-09-22
|
10 | Allison Mankin | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-09-29 by Allison Mankin |
2005-09-22
|
10 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Allison Mankin |
2005-09-22
|
10 | Allison Mankin | [Note]: 'These documents were much reviewed (by Chairs, WG and me) on architecture and details, in WG. The document on error codes was submitted for … [Note]: 'These documents were much reviewed (by Chairs, WG and me) on architecture and details, in WG. The document on error codes was submitted for publication a long time before its companion, but waited, and then had updates for it.' added by Allison Mankin |
2005-09-12
|
10 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to Waiting for Writeup from Waiting for Writeup::Revised ID Needed by Allison Mankin |
2005-09-10
|
10 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to Waiting for Writeup::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for Writeup by Allison Mankin |
2005-07-15
|
10 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-10.txt |
2005-05-31
|
09 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-09.txt |
2005-05-20
|
10 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system |
2005-05-06
|
10 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2005-05-06
|
10 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2005-05-05
|
10 | Allison Mankin | Last Call was requested by Allison Mankin |
2005-05-05
|
10 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Allison Mankin |
2005-05-05
|
10 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2005-05-05
|
10 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2005-05-05
|
10 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2005-05-05
|
10 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Allison Mankin |
2005-04-14
|
10 | Dinara Suleymanova | Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested |
2005-03-31
|
08 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-08.txt |
2005-03-16
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-07.txt |
2005-02-22
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-06.txt |
2004-10-26
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-05.txt |
2004-09-07
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-04.txt |
2004-03-22
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-03.txt |
2004-02-16
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-02.txt |
2003-07-28
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-01.txt |
2003-06-24
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sip-resource-priority-00.txt |