The Use of the SIPS URI Scheme in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
draft-ietf-sip-sips-09
Yes
(Cullen Jennings)
(Jon Peterson)
(Magnus Westerlund)
No Objection
(Chris Newman)
(Dan Romascanu)
(David Ward)
(Jari Arkko)
(Lisa Dusseault)
(Mark Townsley)
(Pasi Eronen)
(Ross Callon)
(Russ Housley)
(Tim Polk)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Cullen Jennings Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Magnus Westerlund Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Chris Newman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Ward Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Lars Eggert Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-11-05)
Unknown
** Obsolete normative reference: RFC 4346 (Obsoleted by RFC 5246) Section 3.2., paragraph 1: > request was delivered securily on each hop, while in fact, in was Nit: s/securily/securely/ Section 5.1.1., paragraph 6: > To emphasise what is already defined in [RFC3261], UAs MUST NOT use Nit: s/emphasise/emphasize/ (also elsewhere) Section 5.4., paragraph 4: > used inconsistenty (e.g,, the Request-URI is a SIPS URI, but the Nit: s/inconsistenty/inconsistently/ Section 6.3., paragraph 2: > Edge Proxy B. Note that Registar/Authoritative Proxy B preserved the Nit: s/Registar/Registrar/ (also elsewhere)
Lisa Dusseault Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Mark Townsley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pasi Eronen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ross Callon Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Tim Polk Former IESG member
(was No Record, Discuss, No Objection)
No Objection
No Objection
(2008-11-06)
Unknown
section 3.2 s/securily/securely/ in several places: s/inconsistenty/inconsistently/