Ballot for draft-ietf-sipcore-dns-dual-stack
Yes
No Objection
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 07 and is now closed.
Thanks! This seems very useful in the preparation for Happy-Eyeballs. One question: Why does a client need to look up ALL addresses if it already knows that it itself only support one specific address familiy? And related to this question: Shouldn't it be named "multi-stack client" instead of "dual-stack client"?
I appreciate this work. I do have one comment. Could you provide some explanation for the reader as to why SIP is "different", following this statement? Even an example would be useful. Unfortunately, in common SIP situations, it is not possible to "race" simultaneous request attempts using two address families.
Thanks for addressing my DISCUSS points.