datatracker.ietf.org
Sign in
Version 5.3.0, 2014-04-12
Report a bug

Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Notification Extension for Notification Rate Control
draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-09

Diffs

Document history

DateVersionByText
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ralph Droms
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Alexey Melnikov
2012-08-22 RFC (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for David Harrington
2012-01-27 RFC Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2012-01-27 RFC (System) RFC published
2011-10-13 09 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2011-10-13 09 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2011-10-12 09 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2011-10-12 09 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-10-12 09 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-10-11 09 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-10-11 09 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2011-10-11 09 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-10-11 09 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) The document defines max-rate, but never specifies the acceptable range of the values.

"The value of this parameter is a positive real ...[show all]
2011-10-11 09 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-10-04 09 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-10-04 09 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup text changed
2011-09-08 09 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) The document defines max-rate, but never specifies the acceptable range of the values.

"The value of this parameter is a positive real ...[show all]
2011-09-01 09 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
I've cleared my Discuss.

There is something wrong with this phrase in the text from section 8
that I quoted above: "This ...[show all]
2011-09-01 09 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ralph Droms has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-08-31 09 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-08-31 09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-09.txt (diff from previous)
2011-08-24 08 Robert Sparks State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-08-02 08 Ralph Droms [Ballot comment]
There is something wrong with this phrase in the text from section 8
that I quoted above: "This combination allows to reduce [...]"
2011-08-02 08 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
Updated based on rev -08


The definitions of the various rate parameters are now stated as a
number of events per second, which ...[show all]
2011-07-14 08 Adam Roach Updating new tool with document state
2011-07-14 08 Adam Roach IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document
2011-07-14 08 Adam Roach See IESG ballot
2011-07-14 08 Adam Roach Annotation tag Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by IESG set.
2011-07-12 08 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
updated to -08-

1) The document defines max-rate, but never specifies the acceptable range of the values.

"The value of this parameter is ...[show all]
2011-07-11 08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-08.txt (diff from previous)
2011-05-11 07 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
updated to -07- (including numbering)

1) The document defines max-rate, but never specifies the acceptable range of the values.

2) I support Ralph ...[show all]
2011-05-06 07 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
Updated based on rev -07

In my opinion, the changes in rev -07 correct the issues related to
"rate" versus "interval", but introduce ...[show all]
2011-04-01 07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-07.txt (diff from previous)
2011-03-10 06 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
updated to -06- (including numbering)

A number of changes were made to the document, but a number of issues have not been addressed ...[show all]
2011-03-07 06 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
updated to -06- (including numbering)

A number of changes were made to the document, but a number of issues have not been addressed ...[show all]
2011-03-07 06 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
updated to -06- (including numbering)

1) The document defines max-rate, min-rate, and adaptive-min-rate parameters, but the text refers to the "max-interval parameter" and ...[show all]
2011-03-02 06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-02 06 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-01 06 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-03-01 06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-06.txt (diff from previous)
2011-02-10 05 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] Position for Alexey Melnikov has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-02-10 05 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
Taking over a DISCUSS from Alexey...

In 9.2:

      event-param    =/  min-interval-param
      subexp-params  =/  min-interval-param
      min-interval-param =  "min-interval" EQUAL delta-seconds

      event-param    =/  max-interval-param
      subexp-params  =/  max-interval-param
      max-interval-param =  "max-interval ...[show all]
2011-02-10 05 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to Discuss from No Objection
2010-12-16 05 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation - Defer.
2010-12-16 05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot comment]
I support the issues raised by David and Alexey in their DISCUSSes
2010-12-16 05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-13 05 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) The document continually refers to both rate and interval - two sides of the same coin. I find the current approach to handling ...[show all]
2010-12-03 05 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-12-02
2010-12-02 05 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation.
2010-12-02 05 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-02 05 Ralph Droms
[Ballot discuss]
I fall somewhere between Jari and David regarding the use of "rate"
"frequencey" and "interval" terminology.  I agree with Jari that the
document ...[show all]
2010-12-02 05 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-02 05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-02 05 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot discuss]
In 9.2:

      event-param    =/  min-interval-param
      subexp-params  =/  min-interval-param
      min-interval-param =  "min-interval" EQUAL delta-seconds

      event-param    =/  max-interval-param
      subexp-params  =/  max-interval-param
      max-interval-param =  "max-interval" EQUAL delta-seconds

      event-param    =/  average-interval-param
      subexp-params  =/  average-interval-param ...[show all]
2010-12-02 05 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-12-02 05 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-02 05 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
I have reviewed this document and placed a no-objection vote, even if I do agree with most of the issues raised by Lars ...[show all]
2010-12-02 05 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Just a few nits in a document I found otherwise to be very readable.

idnits points out...

  -- The document has a disclaimer for ...[show all]
2010-12-02 05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-01 05 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-01 05 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-12-01 05 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot discuss]
2010-12-01 05 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2010-11-30 05 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
1. In Section 3.4, the parameter names do not belong in the requirement definitions because they are implementations of the requirements. Thus ...[show all]
2010-11-30 05 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
1. In Section 5.3, the notifier is allowed to modify the "min-interval" value:

  If the subscriber requests a "min-interval" value greater than ...[show all]
2010-11-30 05 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-11-30 05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-11-30 05 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
Section 6., paragraph 0:
> 6.  Operation of the Minimum Rate Mechanism

  DISCUSS: Assuming that you disallow max_interval := 0, this mechanism
  can still be ...[show all]
2010-11-30 05 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 3.4., paragraph 7:
>            paremeters are adjusted from the value given by the

  Nit: s/paremeters/parameters/


Section 7.1., paragraph 4 ...[show all]
2010-11-30 05 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
Section 6., paragraph 0:
> 6.  Operation of the Minimum Rate Mechanism

  DISCUSS: Assuming that you disallow max_interval := 0, this mechanism
  can still be ...[show all]
2010-11-30 05 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-11-30 05 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
1) The document continually refers to both rate and interval - two sides of the same coin. I find the current approach to handling ...[show all]
2010-11-30 05 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2010-11-28 05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-08 05 Robert Sparks Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-12-02 by Robert Sparks
2010-11-08 05 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2010-11-08 05 Robert Sparks Ballot has been issued by Robert Sparks
2010-11-08 05 Robert Sparks Created "Approve" ballot
2010-11-08 05 Robert Sparks State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Robert Sparks
2010-11-03 05 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-11-01 05 Amanda Baber
Upon approval of this document, IANA understand that there are two IANA
actions that must be completed.

First, in the Header Field Parameters and Parameter ...[show all]
2010-10-20 05 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-10-20 05 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-10-20 05 Robert Sparks Last Call was requested by Robert Sparks
2010-10-20 05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-10-20 05 (System) Last call text was added
2010-10-20 05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-10-20 05 Robert Sparks State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Robert Sparks
2010-10-19 05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-10-19 05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-05.txt (diff from previous)
2010-08-26 04 Robert Sparks State changed to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Robert Sparks
2010-07-12 04 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-07-12 04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-04.txt (diff from previous)
2010-06-10 03 Robert Sparks State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Robert Sparks
2010-05-14 03 Robert Sparks State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Robert Sparks
2010-05-14 03 Robert Sparks [Note]: 'Adam Roach (adam@nostrum.com) is the document shepherd.' added by Robert Sparks
2010-05-12 03 Amy Vezza
PROTO writeup for draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-03

  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
        document ...[show all]
2010-05-12 03 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'Adam Roach (adam@nostrum.com) is the document shepherd.' added by Amy Vezza
2010-05-12 03 Amy Vezza Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-niemi-sipping-event-throttle.
2010-02-22 03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-03.txt (diff from previous)
2010-01-08 02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-02.txt (diff from previous)
2009-11-09 01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-01.txt (diff from previous)
2009-05-12 00 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-niemi-sipping-event-throttle.
2009-05-12 00 (System) Draft Added by the IESG Secretary in state 0.  by system
2009-05-11 00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipcore-event-rate-control-00.txt