Updates to SIPREC correcting Metadata Media Type
draft-ietf-sipcore-siprec-fix-mediatype-06

Yes

Andy Newton
Orie Steele

No Objection

Deb Cooley
Erik Kline
Gorry Fairhurst
Gunter Van de Velde
Jim Guichard
Ketan Talaulikar
Mohamed Boucadair
Paul Wouters
Roman Danyliw
Éric Vyncke

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 04 and is now closed.

Andy Newton
Yes
Orie Steele
Yes
Comment (2025-05-05) Sent 
Consider: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6838#section-4.2.9

Given:

```
   Interoperability considerations: Please note that [RFC7866] specified
   the use of "application/rs-metadata", which is obsoleted in favour of
   "application/rs-metadata+xml".
```

Should "application/rs-metadata" be listed as a deprecated alias?
Deb Cooley
No Objection
Comment (2025-05-01 for -05) Sent 
Thanks to Linda Dunbar for her secdir review.

Section 4.1, Security considerations:  I am not a media type expert by any measure, but is it possible to point to RFC7866 directly?
Erik Kline
No Objection
Gorry Fairhurst
No Objection
Gunter Van de Velde
No Objection
Comment (2025-04-25 for -05) Not sent 
Thank you for fixing the errata and the write-up
Jim Guichard
No Objection
Ketan Talaulikar
No Objection
Mohamed Boucadair
No Objection
Comment (2025-04-18 for -04) Sent 
Hi Dan,

Thank you for the effort put into this, especially that this was your first Internet-Draft (according to Acknowledgments Section). It is likely this will be your first RFC. Congratulations!

Thanks to Giuseppe Fioccola for his opsdir review and your explanation at [1] to understand how the “bugs” happened/detected. 

Please find below some few comments:

# Abstract should be complete in itself

CURRENT:
   SIP-based Media Recording (SIPREC) protocol is defined by both RFC
   7865 and RFC 7866.  Unfortunately, both RFCs contradict each other
   regarding how recording metadata is to be labeled.  In addition,
   neither RFCs registered the new media type.  This document updates
   RFC 7866 to align with RFC 7865 when labeling recording metadata and
   registers the new media type.

Consider at least adding the titles of 7865 and 7866 when first cited. See more at rfc7322#section-4.3.

# Expand at first use

OLD: SIPREC is defined …

NEW: SIP-Based Media Recording (SIPREC) is defined …

# Add a reference entry, instead of an inline URL.

CURRENT:
   errata 7987 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7987)

# The boilerplate is not used. Please remove it

CURRENT:
   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
   BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
   capitals, as shown here.

# Make the fix to the interop concern clear enough 

OLD:
   Interoperability considerations: Please note that [RFC7866] specified
   the use of "application/rs-metadata", which this document corrects.

NEW:
   Interoperability considerations: Please note that [RFC7866] specified
   the use of "application/rs-metadata", which is obsoleted in favor of
   "application/rs-metadata+xml".
 
Cheers,
Med

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/BK8zm7oPm3mIsYZoBNLOSwjHGKI/
Paul Wouters
No Objection
Roman Danyliw
No Objection
Comment (2025-05-01 for -05) Not sent 
Thank you to Roni Even for the GENART review.
Éric Vyncke
No Objection