Skip to main content

Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Call Control - Conferencing for User Agents
draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-07

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Brian Carpenter
2012-08-22
07 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Ted Hardie
2005-08-01
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Tandberg Telecom AS's statement about IPR claimed in draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-07.txt
2005-07-06
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Nokia Corporation's statement about IPR claimed in draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-07.txt
2005-06-28
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2005-06-27
07 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2005-06-27
07 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2005-06-27
07 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2005-06-24
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2005-06-23
07 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ted Hardie
2005-06-22
07 Ted Hardie
[Ballot discuss]
In 3.1, the document says:

    A focus SHOULD utilize a GRUU as discussed in Section 4.2.

In 4.2, the document says: …
[Ballot discuss]
In 3.1, the document says:

    A focus SHOULD utilize a GRUU as discussed in Section 4.2.

In 4.2, the document says:

  The Conference URI MUST have the GRUU (Globally Routable User Agent
  URI) properties as detailed in [16].

From discussions with Allison, I understand this to mean that a non-GRUU
URI would be acceptable, provided it met all the properties of a GRUU.  These
are set out in draft-ietf-sip-gruu, which is listed as an Informative Reference.

While I can certainly understand not wanting to gate this work on the appearance
of GRUUs, I believe that this needs to be a normative reference if the requirements
are derived from it.    If you must have access to this document to know the requirements
for constructing the URI, it's normative.

To avoid that, I believe 4.2 should reiterate the 3 main characteristics of a GRUU:
global, routes to a single instance, and long lived.  Importing all of section 3 of
draft-ietf-sip-gruu and replacing "GRUU" with "the conference URI" would do it
well.
2005-06-22
07 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to Discuss from Undefined by Ted Hardie
2005-06-22
07 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2005-06-21
07 (System) State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation by system
2005-06-20
07 Russ Housley [Ballot comment]
Why is this a BCP?  It seems like Proposed Standard would work fine.
2005-06-20
07 Russ Housley [Ballot comment]
Why is this a BCP?  It seems lie Proposed Standard would work fine.
2005-06-20
07 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley
2005-06-18
07 Allison Mankin State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation - Defer by Allison Mankin
2005-06-18
07 Allison Mankin [Note]: 'PROTO shepherd: gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com' added by Allison Mankin
2005-06-18
07 Allison Mankin [Note]: 'PROTO shepherd: gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com
' added by Allison Mankin
2005-06-10
07 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-06-09
2005-06-09
07 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2005-06-08
07 Margaret Cullen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman
2005-06-08
07 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2005-06-08
07 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2005-06-08
07 Ted Hardie State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Ted Hardie
2005-06-08
07 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley
2005-06-08
07 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2005-06-07
07 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman
2005-06-07
07 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2005-06-06
07 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Carpenter has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Brian Carpenter
2005-06-06
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-07.txt
2005-06-06
07 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot discuss]
Is this really a BCP? It looks like an extended example rather than
a firm recommendation. (My words, but point raised by Elwyn …
[Ballot discuss]
Is this really a BCP? It looks like an extended example rather than
a firm recommendation. (My words, but point raised by Elwyn Davies.)
2005-06-06
07 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot comment]
Text uses RFC 2119 terminology but the reference [1] to RFC 2119 is not cited.
Even in the pending -07 version the citation …
[Ballot comment]
Text uses RFC 2119 terminology but the reference [1] to RFC 2119 is not cited.
Even in the pending -07 version the citation is not a real citation.
2005-06-06
07 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot discuss]
Is this really a BCP? It looks like an extended example rather than
a firm recommendation. (My words, but point raised by Elwyn …
[Ballot discuss]
Is this really a BCP? It looks like an extended example rather than
a firm recommendation. (My words, but point raised by Elwyn Davies.)
2005-06-06
07 Brian Carpenter
[Ballot discuss]
Is this really a BCP? It looks like an extended example rather than
a firm recommendation. (My words, but point raised by Elwyn …
[Ballot discuss]
Is this really a BCP? It looks like an extended example rather than
a firm recommendation. (My words, but point raised by Elwyn Davies.)

Text uses RFC 2119 terminology but the reference [1] to RFC 2119 is not cited.
2005-06-06
07 Brian Carpenter [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter
2005-06-05
07 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin
2005-06-05
07 Allison Mankin Ballot has been issued by Allison Mankin
2005-06-05
07 Allison Mankin Created "Approve" ballot
2005-06-05
07 Allison Mankin [Note]: 'PROTO shepherd: gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com
Revised for GEN-ART review - version -07 submitted.  Please read:
http://ee.wustl.edu/~alan/draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-07.txt' added by Allison Mankin
2005-06-01
07 Allison Mankin [Note]: 'PROTO shepherd: gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com
Revised for GEN-ART review' added by Allison Mankin
2005-06-01
07 Allison Mankin State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Allison Mankin
2005-06-01
07 Allison Mankin Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-06-09 by Allison Mankin
2005-05-26
07 Michelle Cotton IANA Last Call Comments:
We understand this document to have no IANA Actions.
2005-05-20
07 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2005-05-06
07 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2005-05-06
07 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2005-05-05
07 Allison Mankin Last Call was requested by Allison Mankin
2005-05-05
07 Allison Mankin State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Allison Mankin
2005-05-05
07 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2005-05-05
07 (System) Last call text was added
2005-05-05
07 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2005-05-05
07 Allison Mankin In AD Review (comments sent) and IETF Last Call at the same time
2005-04-21
07 Allison Mankin State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Allison Mankin
2005-04-21
07 Allison Mankin [Note]: 'PROTO shepherd: gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com' added by Allison Mankin
2005-04-18
07 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested
2004-11-30
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-06.txt
2004-10-22
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-05.txt
2004-07-20
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-04.txt
2004-02-17
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-03.txt
2003-11-17
(System) Posted related IPR disclosure: Nokia's Statment about IPR Claimed in draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing
2003-10-27
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-02.txt
2003-07-01
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-01.txt
2003-04-15
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-00.txt