An INVITE-Initiated Dialog Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package-06
Revision differences
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-22
|
06 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Scott Hollenbeck |
2005-04-27
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
2005-04-26
|
06 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
2005-04-26
|
06 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
2005-04-26
|
06 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2005-04-24
|
06 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Allison Mankin |
2005-04-24
|
06 | Allison Mankin | [Note]: 'PROTO Shepherd Gonzalo Camarillo' added by Allison Mankin |
2005-04-24
|
06 | Allison Mankin | [Note]: 'PROTO Shepherd Gonzalo Camarillo ' added by Allison Mankin |
2005-04-16
|
06 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Scott Hollenbeck has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Scott Hollenbeck |
2005-04-14
|
06 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Margaret Wasserman by Margaret Wasserman |
2005-04-14
|
06 | (System) | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by IESG Secretary |
2005-04-14
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation - Defer by Amy Vezza |
2005-04-14
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package-06.txt |
2005-04-14
|
06 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot comment] This was very well done. The one thing I'd suggest when doing similar documents in the future is that you include an explicit … [Ballot comment] This was very well done. The one thing I'd suggest when doing similar documents in the future is that you include an explicit analysis of the advice on authorization policy and confirm that the proposed applications in the introduction are actually compatible with this advice. |
2005-04-14
|
06 | Sam Hartman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sam Hartman by Sam Hartman |
2005-04-14
|
06 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner |
2005-04-14
|
06 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen |
2005-04-14
|
06 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson |
2005-04-13
|
06 | David Kessens | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens |
2005-04-13
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ted Hardie has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Ted Hardie |
2005-04-13
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot comment] In the introduction: up, user A's phone rings. When A picks it up, they here ringing, --> up, user A's phone rings. When … [Ballot comment] In the introduction: up, user A's phone rings. When A picks it up, they here ringing, --> up, user A's phone rings. When A picks it up, they hear ringing, I would find an example in "3.11 State agents" very useful. In that same vein, including a session description element in the sample in 4.2 would be useful. In 4.1.6.3, it should probably be clarified whether the MIME type parameter's changing should trigger an updated session description, since the "bucket" mime type parameters actually carry things like codec which are likely to be of interest. In 4.3, the document says: If the value in the new document is one higher than the local version number, the local version number is increased by one, and the document is processed. If the value in the document is more than one higher than the local version number, the local version number is set to the value in the new document, and the document is processed. Am I missing something, or is this equivalent to saying "If the value in the document is higher than the local version number, the local version number is set to the value in the new document, and the document is processed"? That is, is the incremented by one case actually different? |
2005-04-13
|
06 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie |
2005-04-13
|
06 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Mark Townsley by Mark Townsley |
2005-04-13
|
06 | Russ Housley | [Ballot comment] The description of sip.byeless in section 5.1 is much more clear than the description in section 1. Repeating the first few sentences … [Ballot comment] The description of sip.byeless in section 5.1 is much more clear than the description in section 1. Repeating the first few sentences of section 5.1 in section 1 would have been helpful to me. |
2005-04-13
|
06 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley by Russ Housley |
2005-04-12
|
06 | Allison Mankin | [Note]: 'PROTO Shepherd Gonzalo Camarillo 06 will be on the agenda - schemas fixed' added by Allison Mankin |
2005-04-12
|
06 | Allison Mankin | [Note]: 'PROTO Shepherd Gonzalo Camarillo' added by Allison Mankin |
2005-04-06
|
06 | Michelle Cotton | IANA Comments: Upon approval of this document the IANA will register a new MIME type, a new XML namespace and schema, and two new media … IANA Comments: Upon approval of this document the IANA will register a new MIME type, a new XML namespace and schema, and two new media feature parameters in the SIP tree. In the description in section 89, it should probably also say "and schema" as this is also included in the IANA Considerations section. |
2005-04-01
|
06 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2005-03-31 |
2005-03-31
|
06 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot comment] Since the draft is going to be touched anyway, I didn't make this a DISCUSS, but I'd appreciate the authors' attention to these … [Ballot comment] Since the draft is going to be touched anyway, I didn't make this a DISCUSS, but I'd appreciate the authors' attention to these comments from the Gen-Art review by Michael Patton: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has a few things that I'd like to see cleared up before publication. The first one can be done as a normal part of RFC prep, the second probably needs some new text, which would need review. In Section 1, first paragraph, references to RFCs are sometimes done with the reference number (and not the RFC number) and sometimes with the RFC number (and not the reference number). Besides being inconsistent, this makes it hard to notice the correlation between the various references. I'd suggest making ALL the references in the form "RFC3265 [1]" which is clear and makes it consistent. There are other places in the doc where RFCs are mentioned without references. They should be added. The last paragraph of the Introduction seemed just a bit sparse to me. But, as I'm unfamiliar with the subject area this may just be my lack of background. This does suggest that the paragraph might be improved with a little more explanation. On the other hand it _is_ the introduction, so it's not supposed to be complete. Then, when I get to Section 5 which does have the definitions, I find myself asking what these have to do with the rest of the document. It seems to me that these are general parameters and not specific to this document. I think the document needs to explain what these are for somewhere... Typos: Abstract: "an receive notifications" => "and receive notifications" Section 3.7.1 nearly at the end: "the replaced invitation transition transitions to" => "the replaced invitation transitions to" Section 3.7.2: paragraph 4 has an unmatched open paren. Section 4.1.6.2: second paragraph has an unmatched open paren. The doubly nested parens at the end of paragraph 2 in Section 5.2 are confusing, and suggest that that sentence should be rewritten as several to avoid the nesting. Random comment: I would have used Dave instead of Bob and then the VM mailbox could have been daves-not-here-man... but that joke's probably US centric... |
2005-03-31
|
06 | Brian Carpenter | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Carpenter by Brian Carpenter |
2005-03-28
|
06 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot discuss] It doesn't look like my review comments from January have been addressed: http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-January/000574.html I just ran the schema found in section 4.4 through … [Ballot discuss] It doesn't look like my review comments from January have been addressed: http://eikenes.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-January/000574.html I just ran the schema found in section 4.4 through the checker again and the errors are still there. Please change the registrant/change controller info for the requests found in section 8 to either be the IESG or "as designated by the IESG" for a working group. |
2005-03-28
|
06 | Scott Hollenbeck | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck |
2005-03-27
|
06 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Allison Mankin |
2005-03-27
|
06 | Allison Mankin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Allison Mankin |
2005-03-27
|
06 | Allison Mankin | Ballot has been issued by Allison Mankin |
2005-03-27
|
06 | Allison Mankin | Created "Approve" ballot |
2005-03-23
|
06 | Allison Mankin | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2005-03-31 by Allison Mankin |
2005-03-23
|
06 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Allison Mankin |
2005-03-22
|
06 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system |
2005-03-08
|
06 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
2005-03-08
|
06 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
2005-03-08
|
06 | Allison Mankin | Last Call was requested by Allison Mankin |
2005-03-08
|
06 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Allison Mankin |
2005-03-08
|
06 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
2005-03-08
|
06 | (System) | Last call text was added |
2005-03-08
|
06 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
2005-03-08
|
06 | Allison Mankin | ietf-types review resulted in revision (during January) |
2005-01-24
|
06 | Allison Mankin | State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Allison Mankin |
2005-01-24
|
06 | Allison Mankin | Sent to ietf-types and got comment Scott H xml schema needs fixing |
2004-12-22
|
06 | Dinara Suleymanova | State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Dinara Suleymanova |
2004-11-23
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package-05.txt |
2004-05-25
|
06 | Allison Mankin | Draft Added by Allison Mankin |
2004-02-17
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package-04.txt |
2003-10-27
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package-03.txt |
2003-07-03
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package-02.txt |
2003-03-05
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package-01.txt |
2002-06-27
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package-00.txt |