Use Cases and Requirements for SIP-Based Media Recording (SIPREC)
draft-ietf-siprec-req-12
Yes
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Jari Arkko)
(Pete Resnick)
(Ralph Droms)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Stewart Bryant)
(Wesley Eddy)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 12 and is now closed.
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-05-23)
Unknown
REQ-012 refers to "the identities of parties involved". The term "identity" is vague. I suggest changing "identities" to "identifiers" or, even better, "SIP identifiers" or "SIP addresses". In REQ-024, what is "wall clock time"? Regarding terms such as "authentication", "confidentiality", "encryption", and "integrity" in REQ-025 through REQ-032, an informational reference to RFC 4949 seems appropriate.
Ralph Droms Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-05-26)
Unknown
I support Stephen's discusses.
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2011-06-01)
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Wesley Eddy Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown