Multiple Signatures in Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
draft-ietf-smime-multisig-05
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2009-05-27
|
(System) | Posted related IPR disclosure: Certicom's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-tls-rfc4347-bis, draft-rescorla-tls-suiteb, draft-ietf-tls-extractor, draft-green-secsh-ecc, draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp, draft-igoe-secsh-suiteb, draft-ietf-smime-3851bis, draft-ietf-smime-3850bis … Posted related IPR disclosure: Certicom's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-tls-rfc4347-bis, draft-rescorla-tls-suiteb, draft-ietf-tls-extractor, draft-green-secsh-ecc, draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp, draft-igoe-secsh-suiteb, draft-ietf-smime-3851bis, draft-ietf-smime-3850bis, dra... |
|
|
2009-05-18
|
(System) | Posted related IPR disclosure: Certicom's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-smime-3278bis, draft-ietf-smime-sha2, draft-ietf-smime-multisig, draft-ietf-smime-3850bis, draft-ietf-smime-3851bis, draft-igoe-secsh-suiteb, draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp, draft-green-secsh-ecc … Posted related IPR disclosure: Certicom's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-smime-3278bis, draft-ietf-smime-sha2, draft-ietf-smime-multisig, draft-ietf-smime-3850bis, draft-ietf-smime-3851bis, draft-igoe-secsh-suiteb, draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp, draft-green-secsh-ecc, draft-ie... |
|
|
2008-10-30
|
(System) | ||
|
2008-05-27
|
05 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan |
|
2008-05-27
|
05 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress |
|
2008-05-27
|
05 | (System) | IANA Action state changed to In Progress |
|
2008-05-27
|
05 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2008-05-27
|
05 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2008-05-27
|
05 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2008-05-23
|
05 | (System) | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2008-05-22 |
|
2008-05-22
|
05 | Cindy Morgan | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan |
|
2008-05-22
|
05 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot comment] |
|
2008-05-22
|
05 | Lisa Dusseault | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault |
|
2008-05-22
|
05 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot comment] I found this document quite difficult to understand -- I'd suggest doing some editorial work especially in Section 3 (the last bullet before … [Ballot comment] I found this document quite difficult to understand -- I'd suggest doing some editorial work especially in Section 3 (the last bullet before the example), Section 4.6, and Section 5. Section 7: for future reference, it wouldn't hurt to say how the OIDs have been assigned (and this information shouldn't be removed by the RFC editor). In OIDs, both spellings "pkcs9(9)" and "pkcs-9(9)" are used. [PROFILE] should point to RFC5280, unless the reference to 3280 is intentional (if it is, a short explanation would be useful). Section 3: the last two lines should probably have one more level of indentation? |
|
2008-05-22
|
05 | Pasi Eronen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen |
|
2008-05-22
|
05 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jari Arkko |
|
2008-05-22
|
05 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot comment] The document says: If both SignerInfo objects are not present, the relying party can easily determine that another SignerInfo has … [Ballot comment] The document says: If both SignerInfo objects are not present, the relying party can easily determine that another SignerInfo has been removed. My english may not be perfect, but doesn't "both X are not present" mean that there are no Xs at all in the message? Consider writing this as "If either SignerInfo object is missing, the relaying party ..." |
|
2008-05-22
|
05 | Magnus Westerlund | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund |
|
2008-05-22
|
05 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson |
|
2008-05-21
|
05 | Cullen Jennings | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings |
|
2008-05-21
|
05 | Chris Newman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman |
|
2008-05-21
|
05 | Ross Callon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon |
|
2008-05-21
|
05 | Mark Townsley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley |
|
2008-05-20
|
05 | Ron Bonica | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica |
|
2008-05-20
|
05 | Lars Eggert | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert |
|
2008-05-19
|
05 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu |
|
2008-05-19
|
05 | Dan Romascanu | [Ballot comment] The Discussion section in the introduction before the Table of Contents needs to be removed. |
|
2008-05-16
|
05 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Russ Housley |
|
2008-05-15
|
05 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to David Harrington |
|
2008-05-15
|
05 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Telechat review by SECDIR is assigned to David Harrington |
|
2008-05-09
|
05 | Tim Polk | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Tim Polk |
|
2008-05-09
|
05 | Tim Polk | Ballot has been issued by Tim Polk |
|
2008-05-09
|
05 | Tim Polk | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2008-05-09
|
05 | Tim Polk | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Tim Polk |
|
2008-05-09
|
05 | Tim Polk | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2008-05-22 by Tim Polk |
|
2008-03-11
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-multisig-05.txt |
|
2008-03-07
|
05 | (System) | State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system |
|
2008-03-06
|
05 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: David Harrington. |
|
2008-03-05
|
05 | Amanda Baber | IANA Last Call comments: As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this document to have NO IANA Actions. |
|
2008-02-25
|
05 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to David Harrington |
|
2008-02-25
|
05 | Samuel Weiler | Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to David Harrington |
|
2008-02-22
|
05 | Amy Vezza | Last call sent |
|
2008-02-22
|
05 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza |
|
2008-02-22
|
05 | Tim Polk | Last Call was requested by Tim Polk |
|
2008-02-22
|
05 | Tim Polk | State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Tim Polk |
|
2008-02-22
|
05 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2008-02-22
|
05 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2008-02-22
|
05 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2008-02-21
|
05 | Tim Polk | Draft Added by Tim Polk in state Publication Requested |
|
2008-01-22
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-multisig-04.txt |
|
2007-11-16
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-multisig-03.txt |
|
2007-07-25
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-multisig-02.txt |
|
2007-06-28
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-multisig-01.txt |
|
2006-12-19
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-smime-multisig-00.txt |