Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.1 Message Specification
draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-09
Yes
(Russ Housley)
No Objection
(Alex Zinin)
(Allison Mankin)
(Bill Fenner)
(David Kessens)
(Jon Peterson)
(Scott Hollenbeck)
(Ted Hardie)
(Thomas Narten)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 09 and is now closed.
Russ Housley Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alex Zinin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Allison Mankin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Bert Wijnen Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-05-13)
Unknown
$ idnits-v1.24 <drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-09.txt idnits 1.24, 16 Apr 2004, 07:05 The document seems to lack an Authors' Addresses Section The document seems to use RFC 2026 boilerplate... The document seems to lack an 2026 Section 10.4(C) Copyright Notice The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(C) Permission Grants Notice The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(C) Disclaimer Warnings: The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(A) Disclaimer The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(B) IPR Disclosure Invitation
Bill Fenner Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Kessens Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Harald Alvestrand Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-05-13)
Unknown
Jon Peterson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Scott Hollenbeck Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Steven Bellovin Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2004-05-12)
Unknown
Is it worth mentioning the need for good sources of randomness when doing DSA signatures? It seems more appropriate for the CMS standard, but I'd think the same would apply to much of 4.1.
Ted Hardie Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Thomas Narten Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown