Skip to main content

Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME) Version 3.1 Message Specification
draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-09

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Thomas Narten
2012-08-22
09 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Harald Alvestrand
2004-05-18
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2004-05-17
09 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2004-05-17
09 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2004-05-17
09 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2004-05-14
09 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2004-05-13
2004-05-13
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2004-05-13
09 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] Position for Thomas Narten has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Thomas Narten
2004-05-13
09 Russ Housley RFC Editor note added to the ballot write-up address the concerns raised.
2004-05-13
09 Thomas Narten [Ballot discuss]
Needs explicit referience to the RFC it is replacing, and presumably, saying that the new document obsoletes the older one.
2004-05-13
09 Thomas Narten [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Thomas Narten by Thomas Narten
2004-05-13
09 Bill Fenner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Bill Fenner by Bill Fenner
2004-05-13
09 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
$ idnits-v1.24 <drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-09.txt
idnits 1.24, 16 Apr 2004, 07:05

  The document seems to lack an Authors' Addresses Section
  The document seems …
[Ballot comment]
$ idnits-v1.24 <drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-09.txt
idnits 1.24, 16 Apr 2004, 07:05

  The document seems to lack an Authors' Addresses Section
  The document seems to use RFC 2026 boilerplate...
  The document seems to lack an 2026 Section 10.4(C) Copyright Notice
  The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(C) Permission Grants Notice
  The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(C) Disclaimer

  Warnings:
    The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(A) Disclaimer
    The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(B) IPR Disclosure Invitation
2004-05-13
09 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Bert Wijnen
2004-05-13
09 Bert Wijnen
[Ballot comment]
$ idnits-v1.24 <drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-09.txt
idnits 1.24, 16 Apr 2004, 07:05

  The document seems to lack an Authors' Addresses Section
  The document seems …
[Ballot comment]
$ idnits-v1.24 <drafts/draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-09.txt
idnits 1.24, 16 Apr 2004, 07:05

  The document seems to lack an Authors' Addresses Section
  The document seems to use RFC 2026 boilerplate...
  The document seems to lack an 2026 Section 10.4(C) Copyright Notice
  The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(C) Permission Grants Notic
e
  The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(C) Disclaimer

  Warnings:
    The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(A) Disclaimer
    The document seems to lack an RFC 2026 Section 10.4(B) IPR Disclosure Invita
tion
2004-05-13
09 Bert Wijnen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for Bert Wijnen by Bert Wijnen
2004-05-13
09 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Formatting problem: No index. I cast a DISCUSS at first, because I couldn't find section 1.5, which describes changes since RFC 2633..... …
[Ballot comment]
Formatting problem: No index. I cast a DISCUSS at first, because I couldn't find section 1.5, which describes changes since RFC 2633.....

No reference to RFC 2633.

No security considerations section (there is a section named "Security", however).

Reviewed by Michael Patton, Gen-ART
2004-05-13
09 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot comment]
Formatting problem: No index. I cast a DISCUSS at first, because I couldn't find section 1.5, which describes changes since RFC 2633..... …
[Ballot comment]
Formatting problem: No index. I cast a DISCUSS at first, because I couldn't find section 1.5, which describes changes since RFC 2633.....

No reference to RFC 2633.

No security considerations section (there is a section named "Security", however).
2004-05-13
09 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] Position for Harald Alvestrand has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Harald Alvestrand
2004-05-13
09 Harald Alvestrand
[Ballot discuss]
I'm sorry.... a document that specifies version 3.1 of a specification without saying anything about what is different from version 3.0 of the …
[Ballot discuss]
I'm sorry.... a document that specifies version 3.1 of a specification without saying anything about what is different from version 3.0 of the specification (RFC 2633) is not complete enough for publication on the standards track.

Formatting problem: No index.

Nit: No security considerations section (it's called "Security")
2004-05-13
09 Harald Alvestrand [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Harald Alvestrand by Harald Alvestrand
2004-05-13
09 Alex Zinin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alex Zinin by Alex Zinin
2004-05-12
09 Allison Mankin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Allison Mankin by Allison Mankin
2004-05-12
09 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jon Peterson by Jon Peterson
2004-05-12
09 David Kessens [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for David Kessens by David Kessens
2004-05-12
09 Steven Bellovin
[Ballot comment]
Is it worth mentioning the need for good sources of randomness when doing DSA signatures?  It seems more appropriate for the CMS standard, …
[Ballot comment]
Is it worth mentioning the need for good sources of randomness when doing DSA signatures?  It seems more appropriate for the CMS standard, but I'd think the same would apply to much of 4.1.
2004-05-12
09 Steven Bellovin [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Steve Bellovin by Steve Bellovin
2004-05-11
09 Ted Hardie [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Hardie by Ted Hardie
2004-05-06
09 Scott Hollenbeck [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Scott Hollenbeck by Scott Hollenbeck
2004-05-05
09 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2004-05-13 by Russ Housley
2004-05-05
09 Russ Housley State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for Writeup by Russ Housley
2004-05-05
09 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2004-05-05
09 Russ Housley Ballot has been issued by Russ Housley
2004-05-05
09 Russ Housley Created "Approve" ballot
2004-05-04
09 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for Writeup from In Last Call by system
2004-04-20
09 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2004-04-20
09 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2004-04-20
09 Russ Housley State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Russ Housley
2004-04-20
09 Russ Housley Last Call was requested by Russ Housley
2004-04-20
09 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2004-04-20
09 (System) Last call text was added
2004-04-20
09 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2004-04-20
09 Russ Housley State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Russ Housley
2004-04-20
09 Russ Housley Draft Added by Russ Housley
2004-04-19
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-09.txt
2004-03-29
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-08.txt
2004-02-16
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-07.txt
2003-10-27
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-06.txt
2003-07-02
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-05.txt
2003-06-03
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-04.txt
2003-01-16
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-03.txt
2002-11-04
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-02.txt
2002-07-03
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-01.txt
2002-02-11
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-smime-rfc2633bis-00.txt