Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
draft-ietf-smime-rfc3369bis-04
Yes
No Objection
Recuse
No Record
Summary: Needs a YES. Needs 9 more YES or NO OBJECTION positions to pass.
Lars Eggert (was Discuss, No Objection) No Objection
Alvaro Retana No Record
Andrew Alston No Record
Erik Kline No Record
Francesca Palombini No Record
John Scudder No Record
Martin Duke No Record
Murray Kucherawy No Record
Paul Wouters No Record
Robert Wilton No Record
Roman Danyliw No Record
Warren Kumari No Record
Zaheduzzaman Sarker No Record
Éric Vyncke No Record
(Alexey Melnikov; former steering group member) (was Discuss) Yes
I would prefer if Errata is folded into the document, references are updated and a new RFC is created. I am fine with not opening the document to any other kind of change.
(Tim Polk; former steering group member) Yes
(Adrian Farrel; former steering group member) No Objection
(Cullen Jennings; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Dan Romascanu; former steering group member) No Objection
(Jari Arkko; former steering group member) No Objection
Why on earth does the "Position list for N.N. for 2009-04-23 telechat " page in the tracker for this document point to some unrelated draft (https://datatracker.ietf.org/cgi-bin/idtracker.cgi#draft-schoenw-snmp-tc-ext) as opposed to the RFC?
(Lisa Dusseault; former steering group member) No Objection
(Magnus Westerlund; former steering group member) No Objection
(Pasi Eronen; former steering group member) No Objection
I agree with Lars/Alexey that rolling in the erratas and RFC 4853 would improve the document.
(Ralph Droms; former steering group member) No Objection
(Robert Sparks; former steering group member) (was Discuss) No Objection
(Ron Bonica; former steering group member) No Objection
(Ross Callon; former steering group member) No Objection
(Russ Housley; former steering group member) Recuse